Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

If I recall, the standard for the data listed above was more than 5 people shot by a single shooter, not including families and organized crime.

(03-23-2021, 04:50 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]If I recall, the standard for the data listed above was more than 5 people shot by a single shooter, not including families and organized crime.

Gang wars and terrorist incidents like this one should also qualify as exceptions.

If you want to buy an AR-15 you better get it now (if you can find one).  The Biden Harris regime is going to try to ram through another un-constitutional EO banning them because they are "scary looking" and supposedly "military grade".

I was lucky and was able to purchase one for the grandson.  We have fun playing "battleship" on the targets that we have in my back yard.

Gangs are considered organized crime. I'm not sure terror would be excluded.

What is the common denominator regarding mass shootings?  I'll give a hint... it's not the weapon of choice.

(03-23-2021, 05:47 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]If you want to buy an AR-15 you better get it now (if you can find one).  The Biden Harris regime is going to try to ram through another un-constitutional EO banning them because they are "scary looking" and supposedly "military grade".

I was lucky and was able to purchase one for the grandson.  We have fun playing "battleship" on the targets that we have in my back yard.

A good start for this clown show of an administration would be providing the definition of an "assault weapon".

This garbage will never hold up in court.

(03-23-2021, 06:06 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-23-2021, 05:47 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]If you want to buy an AR-15 you better get it now (if you can find one).  The Biden Harris regime is going to try to ram through another un-constitutional EO banning them because they are "scary looking" and supposedly "military grade".

I was lucky and was able to purchase one for the grandson.  We have fun playing "battleship" on the targets that we have in my back yard.

A good start for this clown show of an administration would be providing the definition of an "assault weapon".

This garbage will never hold up in court.

Their definition is any gun that is black (isn't that racist?), looks scary because it has a "thingy" and holds more than 10 rounds of ammunition.  It's "military grade" only because it looks like what they carry in the army movies on television.

An AR-15 is nothing more than a high velocity .22.

(03-23-2021, 06:30 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-23-2021, 06:06 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]A good start for this clown show of an administration would be providing the definition of an "assault weapon".

This garbage will never hold up in court.

Their definition is any gun that is black (isn't that racist?), looks scary because it has a "thingy" and holds more than 10 rounds of ammunition.  It's "military grade" only because it looks like what they carry in the army movies on television.

An AR-15 is nothing more than a high velocity .22.

Soldiers carry pistols as sidearms in combat as well. The "weapons of war" is too broad of a term. Maybe the goal is to prevent law abiding citizens from defending themselves against Islamic terrorist in grocery stores.

(03-23-2021, 06:30 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-23-2021, 06:06 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]A good start for this clown show of an administration would be providing the definition of an "assault weapon".

This garbage will never hold up in court.

Their definition is any gun that is black (isn't that racist?), looks scary because it has a "thingy" and holds more than 10 rounds of ammunition.  It's "military grade" only because it looks like what they carry in the army movies on television.

An AR-15 is nothing more than a high velocity .22.

Technically correct, but...
I don't think anyone thinks bullet diameter is any kind of dividing line between personal protection and mass casualty events.

This has nothing to do with anything, but I can't look at Biden without thinking of Jeff Dunham's Walter.

(03-23-2021, 08:11 PM)RicoTx Wrote: [ -> ]This has nothing to do with anything, but I can't look at Biden without thinking of Jeff Dunham's Walter.

Lol. I said that to my husband a couple of months back after seeing an unrelated Walter meme. I think Dunham used Walter in a youtube video to portray Biden during the debate last year.

(03-23-2021, 06:46 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-23-2021, 06:30 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]Their definition is any gun that is black (isn't that racist?), looks scary because it has a "thingy" and holds more than 10 rounds of ammunition.  It's "military grade" only because it looks like what they carry in the army movies on television.

An AR-15 is nothing more than a high velocity .22.

Soldiers carry pistols as sidearms in combat as well. The "weapons of war" is too broad of a term. Maybe the goal is to prevent law abiding citizens from defending themselves against Islamic terrorist in grocery stores.

Colorado is an open carry state but that didn't help the victims in King Soopers.

(03-23-2021, 08:46 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-23-2021, 08:11 PM)RicoTx Wrote: [ -> ]This has nothing to do with anything, but I can't look at Biden without thinking of Jeff Dunham's Walter.

Lol. I said that to my husband a couple of months back after seeing an unrelated Walter meme. I think Dunham used Walter in a youtube video to portray Biden during the debate last year.

I knew he reminded me of someone and I couldn't put my finger on it for a couple of days.  When I finally realized it, that is all I see now.

Always interesting to hear how these terrorists were "On the FBI radar" after the fact.

Maybe if they didn't spend their time and resources taking down Roger Stone and tipping off CNN to film it, some of these attacks could be prevented.

(03-23-2021, 06:06 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]What is the common denominator regarding mass shootings?  I'll give a hint... it's not the weapon of choice.

Use of a gun.

(03-23-2021, 03:40 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]What should be noted is Biden has been President for two months and jihadi terrorism in the US already fires back up.

What? We need to get back to good old home grown domestic terrorism?

(03-24-2021, 03:45 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-23-2021, 06:06 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]What is the common denominator regarding mass shootings?  I'll give a hint... it's not the weapon of choice.

Use of a gun.

Wrong.  It's the mental health of the shooter.  Banning certain firearms because they "look scary" or "look like military grade" weapons is not the problem.  The problem is mental health.

(03-24-2021, 05:36 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-24-2021, 03:45 PM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]Use of a gun.

Wrong.  It's the mental health of the shooter.  Banning certain firearms because they "look scary" or "look like military grade" weapons is not the problem.  The problem is mental health.

That's why he thinks we should ban all guns, then no one but the completely trustworthy government will conduct mass shootings.

Kamala Harris's niece, who is attempting to make a buck from auntie's position (cue the Willie Brown chuckle) stated that white people were the greatest terror threat in the U.S. Which brings up a good point Mark Kaye made today: What is going to happen when democrats show up to take the guns away from gays, minorities and transgenders who legally own? Where's the line for a party who are simultaneously for and against everything?