(06-02-2021, 07:58 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Dude, I can see how that one could be interpreted as inappropriate, though, it is not uncommon for adults to make the 9 going on 19 joke, and it is not absurd to think that's what he was doing there. It's definitely not conclusive proof of anything, but when you consider Biden's past interactions, I don't fault someone for putting that in the creepy category.
However, there is literally nothing wrong with what Biden did in that last video. If you're seeing it, it's because you want to see it. He didn't touch them. He talked to them about something they'd like, ice cream. He did it loud enough for everyone to hear and where everyone could see. He commented on how tough it would be for a 4 and 5 year old to have to listen to him speak and likened it to purgatory. Talking to kids is not a crime. Don't let your hyperbolic overreactions get the better of you.
This was planned for you to react that way. This was an act, he had prepared jokes written for him. He finds the 2 white girls there, put right in front for him. He couldn't fake it with black girls. Then you can't hear him, so it doesn't matter what he said, which you think he must just have been a grandpa taking care of kids.
Ignore all the other times he has touched, sniffed, felt up young girls then you can view this as fine.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
P, you have gone off the deep end as of late. Take a step back. Look at some alternate news sources. You and I are not far off in what we think about politics, but you are letting your imagination run wild. Biden has been doing stuff like this his entire career. Some of it is creepy, yes. Some of it is just run-of-the-mill politician crap. This is not an example of what you think it is, and you do yourself a disservice by making everything a conspiracy.
Joe Biden has a pattern with children that is best answered by a question. Would you leave your daughter in a room alone with him when he was a regular civilian? The answer is no.
(06-02-2021, 09:18 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Joe Biden has a pattern with children that is best answered by a question. Would you leave your daughter in a room alone with him when he was a regular civilian? The answer is no.
I wouldn't even leave my daughter's clothing in the same room as him..
(06-02-2021, 09:03 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]P, you have gone off the deep end as of late. Take a step back. Look at some alternate news sources. You and I are not far off in what we think about politics, but you are letting your imagination run wild. Biden has been doing stuff like this his entire career. Some of it is creepy, yes. Some of it is just run-of-the-mill politician crap. This is not an example of what you think it is, and you do yourself a disservice by making everything a conspiracy.
This is way past creepy. He is on video doing this and to a bunch of other girls.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2GCTsHCDBkI
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
I would not leave my child with a Biden. That's not the point. You guys have to understand that when you take a completely innocuous video and use it as "proof" of something, that it undermines the argument you are making, right?
(06-02-2021, 11:18 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]I would not leave my child with a Biden. That's not the point. You guys have to understand that when you take a completely innocuous video and use it as "proof" of something, that it undermines the argument you are making, right?
Innocuous? Maybe. Maybe if it was Grandpa Doug who routinely dresses as Santa and everyone trusts and loves and thinks is adorable.
But not Biden.. not with his history of creepiness. And his handlers, speech writers and fixers all know this.
That video is textbook harmless. So harmless, in fact, P_Rushing is saying it's staged to make Biden look normal. Think about that for a second. If the video is so normal that it must be staged, maybe... just maybe... it shouldn't be used as proof of Biden's pedophilic nature. How does this not make sense to you?
(06-02-2021, 12:18 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]That video is textbook harmless. So harmless, in fact, P_Rushing is saying it's staged to make Biden look normal. Think about that for a second. If the video is so normal that it must be staged, maybe... just maybe... it shouldn't be used as proof of Biden's pedophilic nature. How does this not make sense to you?
I'm talking about the guy saying a little girl looks 19... which to Biden means... legal to have sex with.... it's just a weird, gross thing that no normal man would ever say.
This has nothing to do with whether or not Biden is a pedophile. I'm critiquing the circular reasoning of some of the more outspoken Republicans here. When OJ was being tried for murder, the prosecution didn't use video evidence of him running people over during his football career as proof of his violent nature. Likewise, Joe Biden having a harmless interaction with 2 kids isn't proof of anything. It's not PROOF. It shouldn't be cited as proof. Period. Non-pedos talk to kids. Non-murderers play football. Does that mean he's not diddling kids? Nope. Does that mean OJ didn't murder Nicole? Nope.
Just stick to the facts. Biden has certainly had some abnormal interactions with children, but the video that you are citing is NOT one of them. You can't use any interaction he has with children as proof he's into minors. Again, he could be a first-ballot, hall-of-fame pedophile if the truth were revealed. I certainly wouldn't leave my kids with him. But that video doesn't even reinforce that claim in any way, and you show your bias in suggesting otherwise.
This kind of knee-jerk, reactionary messaging makes all Republicans look bad. It's akin to those who say January 6th was an attempted coup. That's where you want to exist in the political world?
(06-02-2021, 12:20 PM)TrivialPursuit Wrote: [ -> ] (06-02-2021, 12:18 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]That video is textbook harmless. So harmless, in fact, P_Rushing is saying it's staged to make Biden look normal. Think about that for a second. If the video is so normal that it must be staged, maybe... just maybe... it shouldn't be used as proof of Biden's pedophilic nature. How does this not make sense to you?
I'm talking about the guy saying a little girl looks 19... which to Biden means... legal to have sex with.... it's just a weird, gross thing that no normal man would ever say.
Yeah, that one at least has some implications in it. I think they are overblown, because Biden has also shown himself to be an inarticulate creep, but it makes sense at least why some people can look at that video and see a pervert. This other one, though...? Not so much.
(06-02-2021, 12:18 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]That video is textbook harmless. So harmless, in fact, P_Rushing is saying it's staged to make Biden look normal. Think about that for a second. If the video is so normal that it must be staged, maybe... just maybe... it shouldn't be used as proof of Biden's pedophilic nature. How does this not make sense to you?
That video by itself is nothing and is harmless. The fact that he does after stopping in the middle of a speech for a pedo chat with girl is to try and show he didn't mean what he said just days ago. A white woman with 2 girls gets put front and center at a speech about the Tulsa massacre. Is that not staged? We know why it was a 2 black girls, he doesn't like them, but you don't allow that to happen if you are his handlers. They put them there and he went and talked to them before he started speaking so he was fresh, alert, and could remember what to say.
(06-02-2021, 01:05 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ] (06-02-2021, 12:18 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]That video is textbook harmless. So harmless, in fact, P_Rushing is saying it's staged to make Biden look normal. Think about that for a second. If the video is so normal that it must be staged, maybe... just maybe... it shouldn't be used as proof of Biden's pedophilic nature. How does this not make sense to you?
That video by itself is nothing and is harmless. The fact that he does after stopping in the middle of a speech for a pedo chat with girl is to try and show he didn't mean what he said just days ago. A white woman with 2 girls gets put front and center at a speech about the Tulsa massacre. Is that not staged? We know why it was a 2 black girls, he doesn't like them, but you don't allow that to happen if you are his handlers. They put them there and he went and talked to them before he started speaking so he was fresh, alert, and could remember what to say.
But he said he loved it when the little black girls would come and play with his leg hair?
I don't recall these blatant cyber attacks being done under the last administration. Anybody know why?
Trump FB ban upheld until immediately after 2022 midterms.
(06-04-2021, 02:23 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Trump FB ban upheld until immediately after 2022 midterms.
Convenient
That will make it all the mo' better when both houses flip back.
Repealing Section 230 is looking more likely after the midterms.
(06-04-2021, 02:23 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Trump FB ban upheld until immediately after 2022 midterms.
(06-04-2021, 02:40 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ] (06-04-2021, 02:23 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Trump FB ban upheld until immediately after 2022 midterms.
Convenient
Is Trump still a resident of Florida? Is Trump still a politician?
Wasn't there some law signed in FL? Trump can now bankrupt FB with a lawsuit.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
(06-05-2021, 02:44 AM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ] (06-04-2021, 02:23 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Trump FB ban upheld until immediately after 2022 midterms.
(06-04-2021, 02:40 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]Convenient
Is Trump still a resident of Florida? Is Trump still a politician?
Wasn't there some law signed in FL? Trump can now bankrupt FB with a lawsuit.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
Yes he is. Good point. Nit sure how that plays into this. To be honest, I'm not really sure he cares about it all that much.