(01-23-2018, 02:18 PM)jagsfan1983 Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4VrQJa2vgc
Show me the last time the Pats were called for an offensive hold in the playoffs. I can wait.
how many holds were called on both offenses ? 0-1 maybe they were calling it that way. the old adage there is holding on every play in the nfl keep your hands inside the shoulder pads its fine.
thats not holding sorry his only engaged lineman's left hand was inside the shoulder pad. if it was outside the defenders right pad that would be holding or if he was pulling the jersey.
i figured it out people have no idea what holding is.
Whatever the reason was, there was for a fact clear bias in the way the officials let that game play out. It's not debatable.
(01-23-2018, 02:14 PM)EastSideDawg Wrote: [ -> ] (01-23-2018, 02:01 PM)jagsfan1983 Wrote: [ -> ]All the Jags had to do was drive down the field once in the 4th with receivers getting mugged to take the lead. However I have no doubt that if that happened the Pats would have driven down and scored as they were basically allowed to hold the entire game. Their game clinching run was a blatant hold right in front of the official and their only successful drive of the first half the refs moved them from their own 27 to the jags 13 by way of 2 penalties on back to back plays.
focus on your team and not cry about the refs ..... its a B*** move jags d line was terrible in the postseason. where did they go tired? injured? nope they got held right ?give me a break.
they arent as good as they think they are. giants, ravens, broncos beat brady up i was hoping Jax would hit brady every other pass and pummel him but they didn't deliver.
Good point man, but but but wait who's in the other teams forums???
(01-23-2018, 02:34 PM)JagsFanClubOfMD Wrote: [ -> ] (01-23-2018, 01:55 PM)EastSideDawg Wrote: [ -> ]just stop .......are you guys going to be the crybabies of the nfl. its sports crazy things happen but you cant script sports.
the jags had the ball with 3 minutes and 3 timeouts. All the Jaguars had to do make one play for a TD sustain one drive to win thats it. they were in the better position they didn't do it.
The Jaguars made a play with 13:49 to play in the game to score a TD that would have made it 27-10. Bad officiating kept them out of the end zone.
Then had two drives ended that should have continued with missed PI calls on Lewis.
If we get just one of those calls to go our we the chances we win go up significantly. If we get 2 out of the three there's little chance we don't win. If we get all 3 then I say there is no chance we don't win.
(01-23-2018, 02:36 PM)EastSideDawg Wrote: [ -> ] (01-23-2018, 02:18 PM)jagsfan1983 Wrote: [ -> ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4VrQJa2vgc
Show me the last time the Pats were called for an offensive hold in the playoffs. I can wait.
how many holds were called on both offenses ? 0-1 maybe they were calling it that way. the old adage there is holding on every play in the nfl keep your hands inside the shoulder pads its fine.
thats not holding sorry his only engaged lineman's left hand was inside the shoulder pad. if it was outside the defenders right pad that would be holding or if he was pulling the jersey.
i figured it out people have no idea what holding is.
Trolling at its finest.
Giving a bump since all the Pats fans seemed to convenience miss this one...
Most of them have gone for now...let’s keep it that way!
They’re still registering.
That’s pretty sad when you think about it.
Lets assume they missed half of the Jaguars penalties. Twice that. You could honestly say the refs were calling that game both ways looking at all those obvious penalties?
I have seen "letting them play" football. And if you are doing that the Bouye PI call is larcenous.
You do not penalize a defender for playing the man right, not giving up his position to the sideline and taking him straight down the field to the point he is stepping out of bounds, and not giving Brady anywhere to put the ball. The throw was nowhere near catchable or near the receiver.
"Letting them play" is not allowing a lineman to shove his fist back into an ends face, especially not on a TD throw and not calling a single hold among multiple cases.. If all TDs are reviewable, why wasn't that caught? "Letting them play" is not allowing a defense to mug receivers well downfield, pull on their jerseys and bodies to keep up with their route and call it one way when it was legitimate in all but the one case against the Jags. And to never call it, in routine cases, right in front of a ref, not once against New England (wasn't that what they used to gripe about back in the day?).
C'mon. You do the math.
(01-23-2018, 02:42 PM)sfljaguarsfan Wrote: [ -> ] (01-23-2018, 02:14 PM)EastSideDawg Wrote: [ -> ]focus on your team and not cry about the refs ..... its a B*** move jags d line was terrible in the postseason. where did they go tired? injured? nope they got held right ?give me a break.
they arent as good as they think they are. giants, ravens, broncos beat brady up i was hoping Jax would hit brady every other pass and pummel him but they didn't deliver.
Good point man, but but but wait who's in the other teams forums???
im a browns fan and took a liking to the jags after they beat Pittsburgh ......because you know i hate pitt more than any other team.
i came in here an every thread is about the refs whining and crying. hardly anything about your team. if the jaguars focus on that rather then making their team better there is no way they are going to beat the patriots.
The officiating is not debatable. Yes, the calls hurt the Jags... but it did not make them lose. Coaching did. That isn't debatable either. Jags played like [BLEEP] cats. Straight up.
(01-23-2018, 03:05 PM)The_Franchise_QB Wrote: [ -> ]The officiating is not debatable. Yes, the calls hurt the Jags... but it did not make them lose. Coaching did. That isn't debatable either. Jags played like [BLEEP] cats. Straight up.
thank you at least someone with a realistic approach.
(01-23-2018, 03:05 PM)The_Franchise_QB Wrote: [ -> ]The officiating is not debatable. Yes, the calls hurt the Jags... but it did not make them lose. Coaching did. That isn't debatable either. Jags played like [BLEEP] cats. Straight up.
There is one call that hurt the Jags, and quite possibly cost them the game. The whistle that stopped the Myles Jack touchdown.
(01-23-2018, 03:09 PM)EastSideDawg Wrote: [ -> ] (01-23-2018, 03:05 PM)The_Franchise_QB Wrote: [ -> ]The officiating is not debatable. Yes, the calls hurt the Jags... but it did not make them lose. Coaching did. That isn't debatable either. Jags played like [BLEEP] cats. Straight up.
thank you at least someone with a realistic approach.
Most have a realistic approach. They just don't post in these threads.
BTW - regarding your d-line comments:
The Jags pressured Brady 10 times, hit him seven times and sacked him 3 times. They only blitzed twice by my count, so they did most of that with just the 4 guys up front. It wasn't as stout as they played early in the season, but it wasn't bad either.
(01-23-2018, 03:23 PM)Limelight Wrote: [ -> ] (01-23-2018, 03:05 PM)The_Franchise_QB Wrote: [ -> ]The officiating is not debatable. Yes, the calls hurt the Jags... but it did not make them lose. Coaching did. That isn't debatable either. Jags played like [BLEEP] cats. Straight up.
There is one call that hurt the Jags, and quite possibly cost them the game. The whistle that stopped the Myles Jack touchdown.
i agree i would be interested in how the nfl rule book outlines what happened on that play. there was the initial hit but the Rb had it pinned to his hip is that possession?
jack ripped it away once on the ground but he wasnt touched so it should have been still live if the ball was out.
The NFL came out and said it was a blown call.
Myles Jack was untouched and the whistle shouldn't have been blown as a challenge flag by Belicheat could have reversed it had he actually been touched, which he wasn't.
Rick Ballou...the patriots fan I might add.