The entire division imploded last year, we still came in third. Losses were caused by such things as failed punt coverage because coaches weren't aware of a severely concussed player, failure to practice the little things such as the center executing a shotgun snap, the inability to game plan against teams using backup or rookie qbs, or adjusting the defense to take neutralize the only wr that was hurting our defense by a head coach that is supposed to know how to coach defenses, the list goes on and on.
There are indeed many variables to winning even when the talent is there. Those variables are all neatly placed atop the head coach's desk...
Quote:He improved???
I was being generous. Didn't want to have Yo collapsing in a heap seeing how emotional he is.
Quote:Whose whining FBT, im laughing... This is comedy to me... You seem a lil tense tho. Everything good? Lol.
Did you want some change for that dime store analysis?
Quote:Shack Harris? So you can't even bring yourself to say Gene Smith? I know he was your hero and let you down but dang. It's ok FBT, he can't hurt us anymore...
:woot: Yeah, I've blocked that out of my memory apparently. The undoing was really cleaning up the mess created by Gene Smith, although Harris wasn't exactly winning many fans around these parts when he was making the decisions. Gene Smith found a way to drive down expectations from there after starting with a lot of hope. He outwitted himself with his personnel prowess.
Quote:Today I learned that it takes a full season to dismantle an nfl roster. A team can't begin to rebuild until an entire season is used to dismantle... a rebuild is actually 4 years, but suckers that don't know about the 1 year dismantle are left for us "in the know" to laugh at and mock when they begin to cry in the third year-- because that is only the second year of the rebuild.
Bunch of chumps. Uh oh, I don't think I was supposed to disclose this to you peasants... oops
It didn't take a full season to dismantle anything. That was completed in one off season. However, the approach they took to rebuilding the roster, building through the draft, and not leaning heavily on big ticket free agency the first couple of years, prolonged the rebound somewhat, but in the end, it will hopefully bring the most rewards.
It's because the front office didn't focus on finding free agents that would placate the "WE NEED BIG NAMES" fans around these parts that they have the resources now to go get the guys who can be true difference makers. They've reduced the number of holes this roster has not by throwing money at them, but by doing everything they can to draft well. Instead of racing out and signing big ticket QBs or WRs, we've developed our own. Teams are always going to have a need to go into free agency for talent at times, but if you draft well, the number of overpriced guys you're bringing in drops significantly. It allows you to build a competitive team that can sustain their success beyond the next season or two, and that's really what this process is/was about from the start.
I think this team was built using a new approach that suits a small market franchise quite well. It's tough enough to compete with big market teams on the field, but even more difficult to do so if you're trying to go toe-to-toe with them in free agency. The hope is that you become a team like Pittsburgh that has done a very good job of drafting for several years, and because of that, they don't have to dive into free agency extensively every year. The guys who they lose to free agency usually have someone coming up behind them who is almost as good as the guys they've lost. They continue to remain competitive. That's what we should be hoping for in this market is a team that can afford to let some of their guys walk over time because they've done a good job of building the roster behind them.
I think we are all more or less in agreement that the team has alot of talent. Caldwell has done an excellent job with the roster. I really don't think my expectations are out of whack; I'm expecting this team to compete for the division and they are talented enough to finish at least 8-8, barring a rash of injuries. I'm not expecting us to set the league on fire or anything.
For those saying this is a growing year, I disagree. We took a big step last year even if we didn't make a huge jump in wins. We were competitive in pretty much every game and lost most weeks due to small mistakes that young players/coaches tend to make. This year the players should be more accustomed to playing in close games and I think they will pull off more wins this year. The "growth year" (for lack of a better term) was last year. This is the year we should start seeing more wins.
Quote:I think we are all more or less in agreement that the team has alot of talent. Caldwell has done an excellent job with the roster. I really don't think my expectations are out of whack; I'm expecting this team to compete for the division and they are talented enough to finish at least 8-8, barring a rash of injuries. I'm not expecting us to set the league on fire or anything.
For those saying this is a growing year, I disagree. We took a big step last year even if we didn't make a huge jump in wins. We were competitive in pretty much every game and lost most weeks due to small mistakes that young players/coaches tend to make. This year the players should be more accustomed to playing in close games and I think they will pull off more wins this year. The "growth year" (for lack of a better term) was last year. This is the year we should start seeing more wins.
With Malik, Gipson, Prince, Fowler, Jack/Bosa/Ramsey, Marks, whomever in the 2nd round..... We should win twice as many games than we did last year.
Robinson Yeldon Thomas Bortles Hurns Lee Greene Ivory.... I mean come on. Below .500 is a disappointment.
Quote:Knighton didn't want to be here. He chose Denver to follow Del Rio. Monroe was at best a serviceable tackle, and another player who had no intention of re-signing here because he would have had to take a lesser contract to move to the right side of the line. The only real mistake was Smith, but even there they didn't think he'd be a good fit, so moving on made sense.
He gutted the team that was built by Shack Harris because the general impression was the roster just wasn't very good. Blowing it up was the best way to get past that and move in a different direction. Again, you and other whiners here moaned and complained about THAT roster, yet you act like gutting it was a bad move. Make up your mind on which side of the fence you'll be watering the grounds with your tears.
You're the one whining like a jilted school girl when I suggest we should pump the brakes on guaranteeing the playoffs, yet you're basically agreeing with me. I've been clear about my expectations, and how I expect the team to be better than the whiner class on this board thinks the will be.
Is Bradley a good coach? I think so. He's definitely highly regarded around the league. He needed some seasoning as a head coach, and he's built a staff that gives him a lot of experience in helping him become a good head coach. We will see soon enough it he's learned from past mistakes that most first time head coaches make. Considering the admission he's made in his own deficiencies, and the effort he's made to address them is a sign that he's grown into the role.
Knighton was benched the year before and wasnt resigned.. Im sure he wanted to be here, if offered a contract. Monroe was more then serviceable... He was pretty good better then Joeckel whom they drafted to replace him.. He was traded to Baltimore ...
I love how u call good points whining! Blake Bortles is a pretty good QB, am i whining about that too? Lol..
If Gus is a good coach then Mike Mularkey must be Hall of Fame. But seriously Gus has potential to be a good coach.. But who doesnt ? I guess we will have to wait and see.. Oh i forgot we have, its been 4 years... Smh..
Quote:I think that part of the problem is the "instant gratification" society that we have become as well as the "everyone gets a trophy" mentality taught these days. People are not patient and don't watch the process proceed and show improved results over time.
Note the "we have the personnel now" type of thought. It's expected by some that it should immediately produce a winning team and/or playoff contention. However, there are many variables to the equation, and quite frankly, no team goes from a complete gutting of a roster to the playoffs in just a couple of seasons.
Another factor to keep in mind is not only how other teams in our division make improvements, but also the general improvements over the entire NFL.
If one can't see the obvious improvement over time (the last 3 seasons) then they probably are part of the "instant gratification/everyone gets a trophy" crowd. It looks to me like the Front Office of the organization is building towards the future over a period of time. What that timeline is... well that's not for me or any fan to decide. That's for the one that really has an investment in this team to decide (Mr. Kahn).
Ultimately my guess is the team needs to finish above .500 for Gus Bradley to retain his position. I do think that it will happen, and .500 or better is still an improvement.
Define your definition of instant? Is it 2 years, 3, or 4? For some of us who watch football,we can look across the fence and see teams, like the Chiefs, Colts, hell the Texans turn it around in one year... So the excuse it takes time too rebuild I agree, but not the 4-5 year amount of time.. And im pretty sure Khan has a timeline as well... Lets see if the fourth year is the end of it ...
Quote:Define your definition of instant? Is it 2 years 3, or 4? For some ofus who watch football,we can look across the fence and see teams, like the Chiefs, Colts, hell the Texans turn it around in one year... So the excuse it takes time too rebuild I agree but not the 4-5 year amount of time.. And im pretty sure Khan has a timeline as well... Lets see if the fourth year is the end of it ...
For someone who has so little to show for his life's work, I find it comical you dare be critical of someone else's "failures"...
As long as we don't have a major injury we can win. By major injury I mean a player like Bortles. With the defense we have built this offseason and the draft coming up, Bradley has no excuse not to lead this team 8-8 or better. I wouldn't fire him mid season because it doesn't do anyone justice. Let him ride it out this year and if he can't lead the team to 8-8 or better he has to pack up his ice-cream machine and go.
Quote:With Malik, Gipson, Prince, Fowler, Jack/Bosa/Ramsey, Marks, whomever in the 2nd round..... We should win twice as many games than we did last year.
Robinson Yeldon Thomas Bortles Hurns Lee Greene Ivory.... I mean come on. Below .500 is a disappointment.
This. I dont expect us to be world beaters this year, but we should at least be in competition to win this division, and I think the 1st team to 10 wins in the AFCS will take it this year.
Quote:The entire division imploded last year, we still came in third. Losses were caused by such things as failed punt coverage because coaches weren't aware of a severely concussed player, failure to practice the little things such as the center executing a shotgun snap, the inability to game plan against teams using backup or rookie qbs, or adjusting the defense to take neutralize the only wr that was hurting our defense by a head coach that is supposed to know how to coach defenses, the list goes on and on.
There are indeed many variables to winning even when the talent is there. Those variables are all neatly placed atop the head coach's desk...
All things considered, Gus is terrible.
Quote:Hamstrung?
Many fans would say the Jags are more "Gus-strung" then hamstrung, especially after letting last year's great opportunity painfully slip by like they did.
Quote:For someone who has so little to show for his life's work, I find it comical you dare be critical of someone else's "failures"...
Is that someone Gus? And how do u know someone elses life work? Lol you just chattering Pirk..
Quote:Many fans would say the Jags are more "Gus-strung" then hamstrung, especially after letting last year's great opportunity painfully slip by like they did.
If they had a pass rush, then I would understand this logic. They didn't. I can't blame the coaching if you don't have the personnel to affect the opposing qb, sorry.
Quote:If they had a pass rush, then I would understand this logic. They didn't. I can't blame the coaching if you don't have the personnel to affect the opposing qb, sorry.
I understand the pass rush talent wasn't there. But you can scheme up pressure, guys like Rex Ryan cook up exotic blitz packages all the time.
Isn't Gus supposed to be a defensive guru? All I saw last year was 4 rushers and a soft zone defense- the famous "ice cream defense." It didn't work. And Gus kept calling it. Where were the adjustments? "Let's keep doing the same thing but compete harder and get better man!"
Quote:If they had a pass rush, then I would understand this logic. They didn't. I can't blame the coaching if you don't have the personnel to affect the opposing qb, sorry.
How did the Colts win more games than the Jags? Bears and Bucs? They don't have elite pass rushers and I would take our offense over all of theirs.
Our pass rush wasn't good but guess what, great coaches coach to their players strengths. They don't stick to just one scheme.
Quote:I understand the pass rush talent wasn't there. But you can scheme up pressure, guys like Rex Ryan cook up exotic blitz packages all the time.
Isn't Gus supposed to be a defensive guru? All I saw last year was 4 rushers and a soft zone defense- the famous "ice cream defense." It didn't work. And Gus kept calling it. Where were the adjustments? "Let's keep doing the same thing but compete harder and get better man!"
So you obviously didn't pay attention to the games. We actually did blitz a ton which caused pretty much every sack or pressure we got and also caused a bunch of huge plays against us like the 90 yard td by mariota. The problem is that our pass rushers literally could never win by themselves and blitzing that often put us in a lot of bad situations.
Quote:So you obviously didn't pay attention to the games. We actually did blitz a ton which caused pretty much every sack or pressure we got and also caused a bunch of huge plays against us like the 90 yard td by mariota. The problem is that our pass rushers literally could never win by themselves and blitzing that often put us in a lot of bad situations.
You can't be serious. The 2015 numbers aren't out there I guess, but in 2013 and 2014, the Jags were dead last in the league in blitz percentage! And I highly doubt that changed much last year. I think it's you that doesn't pay attention to the games.