Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Dareus to Jags
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
(11-07-2017, 03:44 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-07-2017, 03:40 PM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]They do... but you guys roped me in and I became sold. Hook, line, and sinker.
Its what happens when folks are so endearing. Any lets not pretend like I'm spamming your entire forum here. 1 thread in a whole board of threads isnt that much...
I came here bc you folks seemed like you needed a but of intel.
I stayed bc if the engaging conversation.
You have no idea what its like to deal with so many uninformed people who were whining and crying about MD.
Those idiots are STILL crying about how handy he would have been... and maybe he would of... but the point is he wasnt playing and they dont even realize it. You guys seem like a smart bunch, who enjoy football, and know/understand the game more so than other fan bases. Ignorance DRIVES ME NUTS and when the trade went down Bills boards were chalk full of it. You guys seemed like a nice enough bunch and have you ever heard someone say "Those Jags fans, they are such Jagoffs"?? Nope!
So Mr Cleatwood, I'm sorry your board got spammed (even though I moved this shortly after posting when I realized there was a 'league' category but it was quoted and now lives in infamy) but it actually DID relate to MD... from a certain point of view.
I'm glad you want to spend your time here. Go for it.

I just don't care about the Bills. If they lose, that's great for the Jags. If they win, don't care. I also don't need to hear any more about Dareus. You have no new information on him. You're saying the same things over and over again. "FWIW...... Again... I hope he does well..."

If you have things to say about the Jags then by all means, post away. If you want to post about a meaningless Bills game, post in the League forum.

I'm pretty sure you just repeated back to me what I just said to you but with different words....
Also of note, I stopped posting about that last friday... but here we are.
If you dont need to hear any more about Dareus, why even bother reading the thread further?
He played a game last week, no? went well, no? off to a swimmingly good start no? Thats new info as far as I'm concerned which is what was commented.
I TOLD YOU IM WEARING A JAGS HOODIE TODAY!!!!!! If thats not Jags relevant, then god help us all!!! (but Bills and Jags fans just a little more than the others)
(11-07-2017, 03:46 PM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-07-2017, 03:36 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]Emphasis added.  

Some of those responses to Bullseye may cause the jury to remain "out" on that one for a while longer.

YOU are the Mod no?
Bullseye can pull my chain, but when I yank his back I'm considered unintelligent?
Lets also just clarify, theres no hate involved here. I could have taken his statement many ways - the easiest would have been derogatory.
Instead I took it as good natured and responded accordingly. I will say, I like a mod whjo isnt afraid to stir things up and mix it up a bit!

Just some clarification here.

I realize that you are new and you certainly do know a thing or two about football.  It doesn't matter which team you are a fan of, all NFL fans are welcome here as long as they aren't trolling and keep the discussion relevant.  Heck, one of our most intelligent football minds around here (in my opinion) happens to be a fan of the Lions (D6), yet he's been around for several years.  There are others as well, especially in The Division forum.

One other thing that I should point out.  Bullseye is a very well liked and respected member of this board and is also an intelligent football mind.  Some of us around here will be quick to "have his back" if you know what I mean.

Finally, NYC4jags is just one of the many fine moderators of these forums and does a very good job of it.  He deserves a raise.   Banana

Welcome to the board and we look forward to your insight and discussion.  I suggest taking a moment and reading the board rules.

NOW having said all of that and to get back on topic, I agree with the sentiment that yes, Dareus seems to enjoy it here thus far, especially after playing his first game here and seeing what this team is really all about.
(10-28-2017, 12:13 AM)Jagsfan32277 Wrote: [ -> ]Not trolling when its a fact,  what has he done lately?

LOL
(11-07-2017, 03:46 PM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-07-2017, 03:36 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]Emphasis added.  

Some of those responses to Bullseye may cause the jury to remain "out" on that one for a while longer.

YOU are the Mod no?
Bullseye can pull my chain, but when I yank his back I'm considered unintelligent?
Lets also just clarify, theres no hate involved here. I could have taken his statement many ways - the easiest would have been derogatory.
Instead I took it as good natured and responded accordingly. I will say, I like a mod whjo isnt afraid to stir things up and mix it up a bit!

I am indeed humbly one of the moderators of this board. Which is part of the reason I have attempted to be very gracious in welcoming you to our message board. A few of our most revered posters here happen to be fans of other football teams. Your affiliation with the Bills has nothing to do with my statement about the "jury being out" on your intelligence.  That's based on your sophomoric replies to posts you disagree with. 


You will continue to receive hesitancy of respect and assumed intelligence as long as you continue to post phrases of this nature : 



Quote:...you should probably have some sort of idea what you are talking about...


Quote:He will go down in BUF history as one of their biggest busts behind Williams, Maybinn, McGahee either way now that his time with the team is through


Quote:Need a bone head play at a big moment? Dareus is your guy.


Quote:I get being excited and if roles were reversed I'd prob let my excitement get the best of me. 

But for those saying he will fit in as a role player.... that's a TON for a role player.


As a role player in the NFL in his first game as a Jag he made more impact than any other NT run stuffer - league wide. 

OOPS??

12 snaps  --    4 of them run stuffs or pressures.





Quote:Uninformed folks on message boards aside, this was a universally celebrated trade amongst fans. 


This one is hilarious - given everything on the internet refuting the hell out of it.  ^


 Then there's this little gold nugget that I didn't give you a warning for even though I should have:

Quote:I understand you guys think you have a good D that could benefit if he gets his shiznit together.

Not sure what you expect from an opposing fan's MB after those posts, but you clearly have a delusional expectation.
And by the way - we don't think we have a good D. We do have a good D.
(11-07-2017, 03:14 PM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-03-2017, 10:22 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]I'm with you.

For me, that's the result of my buddy.  Were he not so obnoxious, predictable and ridiculously homerish in his stream of consciousness rants, I would otherwise have no reason to hate the Bills.

Glad I could be of some service! 
Guess what?!?! I'm wearing a Jags hoodie today!!!
Just for clarity... homerish cant be called homerish when given from an unbiased but one sided perspective.
Informative from a different perspective? yes. Homerish, no.
I'm not going to be around here to get you all straightened out forever. Eventually, you'll need to figure this stuff out on your ownSmile
With all due respect, the majority of the responses here directed AT me sounded like this season is already over, records were broken, and something was actually won. 
Infact, any time I spoke of my team I was incredibly humble and was sure to keep in mind we are half way through a season and I'm on a Jags forum - not a Bills.
You guys SHOULD be in for a treat as it looks like you are in for a cake walk the rest of the way. You even got a break only having to face Watson for 1 or potentially 4 halves  this year. If MD helps make the run D more stout and things keep up and dont fall apart (which again, given the path ahead seems very unlikey) It could be a great year. 
Dont mistake my explanation as to why your new play thing ended up in JAX as obnoxious or homerish- and if it was so predictable it wouldnt have needed to be explained.

I mean it Bullseye, I'll give ya a couple more freebies, but eventually the training wheels are going to come off and your going to have to start making well informed and thoughout posts all on your own.... Banana 

I am a little flattered to have made such an impression on you though!!!

Huh?

I wasn't referring to you AT ALL.

As ridiculous and myopic as my buddy is about the Bills, he at least knows enough to not put Aaron freaking Maybin in the same class as Marcell Dareus.

"Training wheels?"

From the guy who claimed it was hard for a guy who gets suspended to be a team leader, obviously forgetting the best player in his team's history-Bruce Smith-was suspended and still managed to be a leader?  When reminded of this and others, all you had to say was some jibberish about being from a different era.  Two words:  Tom Brady.  Recent enough for you?

"Training wheels?"

This from the guy who tried to single out Dareus for a drop in productivity, conveniently ignoring the coaching and scheme changes that caused defensive productivity to drop ACROSS the board, not just with Dareus?!?  You STILL haven't explained or even tried to address that fact. 

"Training wheels?"

This from the guy who decries the citation of articles (obviously confusing me with ETDavis) in debating points as if that were a bad thing.  Two things, Sparky.  1.  Research is actually a good thing.  Perhaps you should try it sometimes.  2.  Most of the points I've made in this debate and in most of the discussions I have are from memory, which is why I was able to cite Bruce Smith's suspension and the various trades that escaped you.  As it stands, you have chafed each time anyone here has presented you with fact, saying I was there and you weren't, instead of countering with relevant concrete fact that refutes things presented here.  It's the message board equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears and saying "La la la la la!  I can't hear you."  You've provided nothing in the way of insight here.  The extent of the substance you have provided is harping on off field stuff that most of us were aware of on some level.
Bullseye for President!
(11-07-2017, 08:52 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-07-2017, 03:46 PM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]YOU are the Mod no?
Bullseye can pull my chain, but when I yank his back I'm considered unintelligent?
Lets also just clarify, theres no hate involved here. I could have taken his statement many ways - the easiest would have been derogatory.
Instead I took it as good natured and responded accordingly. I will say, I like a mod whjo isnt afraid to stir things up and mix it up a bit!


Finally, NYC4jags is just one of the many fine moderators of these forums and does a very good job of it.  He deserves a raise.   Banana

NYC4jags.  I know him personally.  He's dum.
(11-08-2017, 02:48 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-07-2017, 03:14 PM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]Glad I could be of some service! 
Guess what?!?! I'm wearing a Jags hoodie today!!!
Just for clarity... homerish cant be called homerish when given from an unbiased but one sided perspective.
Informative from a different perspective? yes. Homerish, no.
I'm not going to be around here to get you all straightened out forever. Eventually, you'll need to figure this stuff out on your ownSmile
With all due respect, the majority of the responses here directed AT me sounded like this season is already over, records were broken, and something was actually won. 
Infact, any time I spoke of my team I was incredibly humble and was sure to keep in mind we are half way through a season and I'm on a Jags forum - not a Bills.
You guys SHOULD be in for a treat as it looks like you are in for a cake walk the rest of the way. You even got a break only having to face Watson for 1 or potentially 4 halves  this year. If MD helps make the run D more stout and things keep up and dont fall apart (which again, given the path ahead seems very unlikey) It could be a great year. 
Dont mistake my explanation as to why your new play thing ended up in JAX as obnoxious or homerish- and if it was so predictable it wouldnt have needed to be explained.

I mean it Bullseye, I'll give ya a couple more freebies, but eventually the training wheels are going to come off and your going to have to start making well informed and thoughout posts all on your own.... Banana 

I am a little flattered to have made such an impression on you though!!!

Huh?

I wasn't referring to you AT ALL.

As ridiculous and myopic as my buddy is about the Bills, he at least knows enough to not put Aaron freaking Maybin in the same class as Marcell Dareus.

"Training wheels?"

From the guy who claimed it was hard for a guy who gets suspended to be a team leader, obviously forgetting the best player in his team's history-Bruce Smith-was suspended and still managed to be a leader?  When reminded of this and others, all you had to say was some jibberish about being from a different era.  Two words:  Tom Brady.  Recent enough for you?

"Training wheels?"

This from the guy who tried to single out Dareus for a drop in productivity, conveniently ignoring the coaching and scheme changes that caused defensive productivity to drop ACROSS the board, not just with Dareus?!?  You STILL haven't explained or even tried to address that fact. 

"Training wheels?"

This from the guy who decries the citation of articles (obviously confusing me with ETDavis) in debating points as if that were a bad thing.  Two things, Sparky.  1.  Research is actually a good thing.  Perhaps you should try it sometimes.  2.  Most of the points I've made in this debate and in most of the discussions I have are from memory, which is why I was able to cite Bruce Smith's suspension and the various trades that escaped you.  As it stands, you have chafed each time anyone here has presented you with fact, saying I was there and you weren't, instead of countering with relevant concrete fact that refutes things presented here.  It's the message board equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears and saying "La la la la la!  I can't hear you."  You've provided nothing in the way of insight here.  The extent of the substance you have provided is harping on off field stuff that most of us were aware of on some level.
Ive mentioned numerous times that while your 'examples' arernt wrong (in that they did happen), they are irrelevant because the League and the way it conducts its business has changed in oh lets say, THE LAST 2 DECADES.
You keep bringing up these trades like you want a cookie for remembering simple transactions/trades/events etc.
There is SUCH a difference between what you get out of national media outlets and what you get via other sources. AGAIN for example I can go look at what the reasoning was TC left after his 1st go round in JAX and parrot what i read to you verbatim and think I'm smart and know the story. I'll bet if I did that however, you'd have a TON of insight that wasnt brought to light in that article and prob contest a few points as well. THAT is essentially what you keep trying to do here and frankly its maddening you THINK you know what you are talking about enough to challange someone who lived it and paid much closer attention to it.
You didnt give a rats about MD until two weeks ago, and were limited to these G rated articles you 'researched' to gather your info. Give me a break! Its no different than the Jags trading Stroud to the Bills and me being ignorant enough to tell you what happened during his time in JAX. Beats the hell outta me! lol. I didnt live it, so...... yeah. See what I mean??
Furthermore, comparing Bruce Smith to MD is just a joke! Its like comparing George Washington to Donald Trump.
They both held the same position, (President/Bills best D player) but the comparisons start and stop there.
That WHOLE team partied like it was 1999 back then and people still tell stories that just amaze me....but the culture is totally different. Back then it seems everyone had their nose in something and it sucked he was suspended etc but it was what it was. Conditioning and everything else in that regard was much less developed and it just wasnt how it is now so its tough to compare. Just as how you cant compare that to the days when guys have off season jobs, showed up to a literal grass field in the middle of nowhere are would smoke on the sidelines.  Now with testing rules being more stringent, you really look like quite the bozo when you fail a drug test ( THAT THEY EVEN KNOW WHEN ITS COMING ) for fake pot. That is not a leader. That is also not even close to the same situation as bruce. Apples to oranges plain and simple.
Same thing with this Brady comparison. Shame on you for comparing the GOAT to MD. Deflating footballs isnt even close to drag racing down busy streets and crashing putting his life and others at stake. Same with smoking synthetic pot, not at all close to letting air out of balls. I'm sure your board will agree with you bc im the outsider, but if this was respected jags fan vs respected jags fan debating this id find it hard to believe they'd see this your way.
I dont know why you keep bringing this Maybin thing up, but the fact of the matter is now that the book is closed on the Bills portion of his career theres no way around the fact it was a colossal disappointment. A 'BUST' if you will. Maybe thats partially the Bills fault for making him the 3rd overall pick in the 2011 draft. Outside of Gabbert and Locker, it could be argued he was the biggest non-qb bust in the top 10. At least Maybin didnt tease us. He just did his thing and faded away and did the same or the Jets soon there after. Marcell showed he could be a monster, which was helpful - but then when he was at his best he was getting in trouble off the field. He had zero regard for his teammates, his team, or more importantly himself UNTIL he made it clear via his actions that in the end he was just worried about getting paid. As soon as that happened he vanished and so did the monster on the field that was Mr Big Stuff. Scheme fit keeps being brought up which I need you to understand is irrelevant in this case because when he was on the field he still occasionally showed flashes. Its not like he was being asked to drop into coverage like Mario would wine about.
 BUT (and this is an important but) the #1 reason MD didnt work in a 3-4?? MARCELL!!!! For example, he only played 8 half hearted games last year. He served his suspension. Then when that was over, it was apparent that when he was on his own he didnt have the discipline to keep himself in shape and kept having little nagging injuries/conditioning issues that kept him out even when his suspension was up. People were livid and fed up. Coaches included as Rex (yes i know, hes a goober who cant keep his mouth shut) just said 'The only thing I saw him stuff were his pockets". Maybe hes bitter - who knows. But the point is, even during his 2 good seasons his off field issues and shenanigans prevented him from getting the recognition as well as getting a fair shake in that scheme. Its easy to look at stats and see they dipped in rex's scheme... but thats just lazy. More goes into it than that. He was the reason he didnt have big years under Rex. He still got to pin his ears back and do his thing (when he was able to play). He complained things were too difficult and wasnt interested in trying.... which led to Bart Scott Telling Marcell ' They cant write the playbook in Crayon' which was both REALLY funny and REALLY sad.
So, in the end, what do you call a player who never lived up to his potential- never became the leader he was paid/expected to be - and was oft in trouble.  An embarrassment? a waste of talent and space? late for dinner? Those seem kinda mean, so I think I'll stick with BUST.
I didnt want to have to spell it out, so I genuinely am sorry if you feel I ' lalalala'd' you by not taking each and every point you made to elaborate further, but I did try responding in a general way essentially saying you stick you your teams business bc its what you know - and ill stick to mine and lets not pretend either is an expert going the other way. I think its pretty obvious we arent. If you felt that strongly your arguments carried weight - well there ya go. I'm sure people will complain about another wall of text - but thems the breaks and you asked for a response.... so there ya go. People will dislike it bc it paints your new toy in a new light as is essentially the problem NYC has with the posts hes outlined above. Dont take it personal. You dont need to defend him or take offense bc we dont know how this plays out for the Jags. Once he balls out - go nuts defending him saying the Bills were dumb etc. If he has more issues down the line, then say it was a low risk high reward move. But dont get cheesed about a comment about why a player didnt work in an organization that wasnt even yours. No point in dwelling on it, but dont pretend it didnt happen either. Just be aware what his issues were and like everyone hes not perfect Fresh start, clean slate, and only 1 way to go - and thats up. By this point this has all been said 100x anyway and we ALL know so lets just do Marcell going forward and what he brings to your team for the rest of the year. Deal?
Good Lawd, what the Sam hell is happening around here? I've seen shorter health care bills. Laughing Laughing
(11-08-2017, 11:46 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]Good Lawd, what the Sam hell is happening around here? I've seen shorter health care bills. Laughing Laughing

Apparently  -- it takes a LOT of words to rationalize labeling an all-pro and two-time pro bowler "a bust."
Derailing threads JDub Style.... Way to go BillsFan.
(11-08-2017, 08:58 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Bullseye for President!

Havent we gotten ourselves laughed at enough with previous 'decisions' like this??

(11-08-2017, 11:57 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Derailing threads JDub Style.... Way to go BillsFan.

umm, so is there a minimum number of times you have to mention Marcell Dareus when talking about Marcell Dareus in a Marcell Dareus thread?
Because I'm pretty sure if the discussion pertains to Marcell Dareus and its in the Marcell Dareus to the Jags thread it remains relevant to Marcell Dareus...
(11-08-2017, 11:39 AM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-08-2017, 02:48 AM)Bullseye Wrote: [ -> ]Huh?

I wasn't referring to you AT ALL.

 People will dislike it bc it paints your new toy in a new light as is essentially the problem NYC has with the posts hes outlined above. Dont take it personal. You dont need to defend him or take offense bc we dont know how this plays out for the Jags. Once he balls out - go nuts defending him saying the Bills were dumb etc. If he has more issues down the line, then say it was a low risk high reward move. But dont get cheesed about a comment about why a player didnt work in an organization that wasnt even yours. No point in dwelling on it, but dont pretend it didnt happen either. Just be aware what his issues were and like everyone hes not perfect Fresh start, clean slate, and only 1 way to go - and thats up. By this point this has all been said 100x anyway and we ALL know so lets just do Marcell going forward and what he brings to your team for the rest of the year. Deal?

Here's the thing. You're the one taking things personally. Your posts are laden with salt throughout this thread. 

No one has really defended his stupid mistakes in this thread. We realize there is a possibility that stuff rears it's ugly head again. We've seen plenty of that crap from our highly paid players over the years.  

 Most of us are just happy to have landed a guy that has the skill set to fill a major need on our defense  - and his salary plus the pick seem totally worth it to us. He may be the guy that puts this defense over the top and into the playoffs. 

Why in the hell does that seem to upset you so much? 

 You seem to be ping-ponging back and forth between trying to be civil and optimistic that MD may work out well for us  -- or throwing barbs and insults our way because we didn't read every article you read in The Buffalo News since 2011.  You should pick one side of the fence and just ride with it.
Well, this thread seems to have run its course!
(11-08-2017, 12:15 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-08-2017, 11:39 AM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ] People will dislike it bc it paints your new toy in a new light as is essentially the problem NYC has with the posts hes outlined above. Dont take it personal. You dont need to defend him or take offense bc we dont know how this plays out for the Jags. Once he balls out - go nuts defending him saying the Bills were dumb etc. If he has more issues down the line, then say it was a low risk high reward move. But dont get cheesed about a comment about why a player didnt work in an organization that wasnt even yours. No point in dwelling on it, but dont pretend it didnt happen either. Just be aware what his issues were and like everyone hes not perfect Fresh start, clean slate, and only 1 way to go - and thats up. By this point this has all been said 100x anyway and we ALL know so lets just do Marcell going forward and what he brings to your team for the rest of the year. Deal?

Here's the thing. You're the one taking things personally. Your posts are laden with salt throughout this thread. 

No one has really defended his stupid mistakes in this thread. We realize there is a possibility that stuff rears it's ugly head again. We've seen plenty of that crap from our highly paid players over the years.  

 Most of us are just happy to have landed a guy that has the skill set to fill a major need on our defense  - and his salary plus the pick seem totally worth it to us. He may be the guy that puts this defense over the top and into the playoffs. 

Why in the hell does that seem to upset you so much? 

 You seem to be ping-ponging back and forth between trying to be civil and optimistic that MD may work out well for us  -- or throwing barbs and insults our way because we didn't read every article you read in The Buffalo News since 2011.  You should pick one side of the fence and just ride with it.
See, this is grossly misunderstood then.
This ping-ponging is due to the fact that the majority of the early part of this thread was me getting dumped on for being truthful about his time with the Bills.
I wanted to make it abundantly clear that while this acts as a clean slate that was much needed, there was simply a reason he ended up with you guys as no team just decides to dump a superstar for peanuts as was being initially speculated. Maybe I overcompensated in the sense that my 'future optimism' was interpreted as hallow, but the fact of the matter is the ONLY thing I got salty about was fans (and maybe I'm giving them too much credit as I dont know who has what reputation around here) were naive enough to think this was the Jags 'fleecing' the Bills. I made it a point to keep mentioning I hope he succeeds b/c if I didnt, its seen as 'salty'. Who knows, 5 years from now it might be. At the moment it was addition by subtraction by jettisoning a guy with a huge check who had become more of a distraction than he was worth.  And I'm not going out of my way to bring this up again, or regurgitate previous statements that we've all moved beyond but YOU are essentially asking me to defend myself. 
Like your previous post picking out some of my 'gems', nothing was bad - nor really even my opinion, but talking points from in and around the Buffalo area. Because those points happened to have a Buffalo slant and took digs at Marcell (again from before his time with the Jags, so theres no need to defend him because it didnt happen on your watch) - that makes me unintelligent? By that logic if you came to a Bills board and started discussion re: records the Jags could potentially break that would make you unintelligent? To me, that dosent add up. Expressing optimism or pessimism toward YOUR team is something you are entitled to do. I dont see why my intelligence comes into question because it doesn't have a home team slant.
So we are clear.
I'm a Bills fan who has always liked the Jags.
I had high hopes for Marcell.
Marcell didnt pan out and became a hindrance.   
He was unloaded to a team that could make an already good defense even better.
$$ is essentially the biggest risk here so depending on how you feel about that $$ equates to how big of a risk it actually is or isnt.
If he returns to form, its a slam dunk.
I like and have liked Marcell. I'm rooting for him to regain his form. 
I'm happy it is with another team.
potential win win.

Thats that IMO

(11-08-2017, 12:45 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Well, this thread seems to have run its course!

we at least have to hit 30!!!!
(11-08-2017, 12:51 PM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-08-2017, 12:15 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]Here's the thing. You're the one taking things personally. Your posts are laden with salt throughout this thread. 

No one has really defended his stupid mistakes in this thread. We realize there is a possibility that stuff rears it's ugly head again. We've seen plenty of that crap from our highly paid players over the years.  

 Most of us are just happy to have landed a guy that has the skill set to fill a major need on our defense  - and his salary plus the pick seem totally worth it to us. He may be the guy that puts this defense over the top and into the playoffs. 

Why in the hell does that seem to upset you so much? 

 You seem to be ping-ponging back and forth between trying to be civil and optimistic that MD may work out well for us  -- or throwing barbs and insults our way because we didn't read every article you read in The Buffalo News since 2011.  You should pick one side of the fence and just ride with it.
See, this is grossly misunderstood then.
This ping-ponging is due to the fact that the majority of the early part of this thread was me getting dumped on for being truthful about his time with the Bills.
...

Because those points happened to have a Buffalo slant and took digs at Marcell (again from before his time with the Jags, so theres no need to defend him because it didnt happen on your watch) - that makes me unintelligent? 


(11-08-2017, 12:45 PM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]Well, this thread seems to have run its course!

we at least have to hit 30!!!!

I was clear about why I questioned your intelligence actually had you read the post carefully - even though that "questioning" was more in jest than meant to be taken literally. 

It was because of your sophomoric retorts to Bullseye. Seemed unnecessary - and the posts in general were largely uninformative and mostly regurgitation of what you'd previously posted in the thread. 
Assuming he was referring to you with "my buddy" didn't help either. 

I'm sure you're a smart guy. No offense intended. Let's move on.
(11-08-2017, 01:05 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-08-2017, 12:51 PM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]See, this is grossly misunderstood then.
This ping-ponging is due to the fact that the majority of the early part of this thread was me getting dumped on for being truthful about his time with the Bills.
...

Because those points happened to have a Buffalo slant and took digs at Marcell (again from before his time with the Jags, so theres no need to defend him because it didnt happen on your watch) - that makes me unintelligent? 



we at least have to hit 30!!!!

I was clear about why I questioned your intelligence actually had you read the post carefully - even though that "questioning" was more in jest than meant to be taken literally. 

It was because of your sophomoric retorts to Bullseye. Seemed unnecessary - and the posts in general were largely uninformative and mostly regurgitation of what you'd previously posted in the thread. 
Assuming he was referring to you with "my buddy" didn't help either. 

I'm sure you're a smart guy. No offense intended. Let's move on.

You took dudes back. I get it. He seems to be able to handle himself. 
Text has no emotion or context. You can say it was in jest the same way I said my response BE was good natured ribbing.
As I mentioned previously, if people werent so quick to jump on me i wouldnt have had to regurgitate the same point over..and over... and over... and over.. until finally it happened to be written in a context someone either understood, agreed with, didnt find offensive, or plain just didnt care any more. 
I did however put the ol'assumption saying to good use in assuming he was talking about me - but we did have an exchange, I seem to be the only Bills fan here, and it was an easy mistake to make... so i dont feel too bad about it as nothing terribly offensive came out of it either way.
In all honestly, (and maybe I'm taking it the wrong way) but that last post seems like when people say 'I dont mean to be a jerk, BUT....." yes, yes they do mean to be a jerk lol. No need to patronize, and im sure you and I, or Bullseye really arent that different in that we enjoy rooting for our team and discussing said teams when time permits. 
Now, if I may- lets try a clean slate and like Mr Big Stuff I'll try to do my best with it!!
(11-08-2017, 01:23 PM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-08-2017, 01:05 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]I was clear about why I questioned your intelligence actually had you read the post carefully - even though that "questioning" was more in jest than meant to be taken literally. 

It was because of your sophomoric retorts to Bullseye. Seemed unnecessary - and the posts in general were largely uninformative and mostly regurgitation of what you'd previously posted in the thread. 
Assuming he was referring to you with "my buddy" didn't help either. 

I'm sure you're a smart guy. No offense intended. Let's move on.

You took dudes back. I get it. He seems to be able to handle himself. ...

In all honestly, (and maybe I'm taking it the wrong way) but that last post seems like when people say 'I dont mean to be a jerk, BUT....." yes, yes they do mean to be a jerk lol. No need to patronize, and im sure you and I, or Bullseye really arent that different in that we enjoy rooting for our team and discussing said teams when time permits. 
Now, if I may- lets try a clean slate and like Mr Big Stuff I'll try to do my best with it!!

No, he certainly doesn't need my help, but I'm not one to sit back while a new user slings insults without any real provocation. 

I'm not being insincere or patronizing. Just calling it like I see it and desiring to move on civilly. 
I'm sure we'd get along fine with a beer in hand and the game on at the sports bar. So let's continue in that spirit.
(11-08-2017, 01:31 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-08-2017, 01:23 PM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]You took dudes back. I get it. He seems to be able to handle himself. ...

In all honestly, (and maybe I'm taking it the wrong way) but that last post seems like when people say 'I dont mean to be a jerk, BUT....." yes, yes they do mean to be a jerk lol. No need to patronize, and im sure you and I, or Bullseye really arent that different in that we enjoy rooting for our team and discussing said teams when time permits. 
Now, if I may- lets try a clean slate and like Mr Big Stuff I'll try to do my best with it!!

No, he certainly doesn't need my help, but I'm not one to sit back while a new user slings insults without any real provocation. 

I'm not being insincere or patronizing. Just calling it like I see it and desiring to move on civilly. 
I'm sure we'd get along fine with a beer in hand and the game on at the sports bar. So let's continue in that spirit.

Has there been anything out of practice this week in re: to taking steps forward and easing into more time?
Obv plays were limited in general last week with the TOTAL # so low, but have they mentioned any sort of plan?
There seemed to be some sort of ryme and reason, i just havent seen anything publicly as to what that is
(11-08-2017, 01:47 PM)Billsfan1212 Wrote: [ -> ]Has there been anything out of practice this week in re: to taking steps forward and easing into more time?
Obv plays were limited in general last week with the TOTAL # so low, but have they mentioned any sort of plan?
There seemed to be some sort of ryme and reason, i just havent seen anything publicly as to what that is

Nothing on that yet, but I'd expect that they'll be measuring his conditioning this week in anticipation of using him on more than 30% of the defensive snaps vs Melvin Gordon and the bolts.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30