(01-26-2019, 06:55 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]A gem from Warren....
This billionaire NFL owner just paid $100M for a "superyacht" with its own iMax theater. I'm pretty sure he can pay my new #UltraMillionaireTax to help the millions of yacht-less Americans struggling with student loan debt. https://t.co/Gk4ifAkxdT
We got them trying to keep up with our owner...good, good.
Kamala already back peddling health care 24 hrs later. What a weak woman.
As the days pass, the Dems candidate strategy is emerging...throw it against the wall and see what sticks.
(01-30-2019, 10:25 AM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]As the days pass, the Dems candidate strategy is emerging...throw it against the wall and see what sticks.
Meanwhile, when guys like Bloomberg and Schultz actually look "normal", you know they have problems.
(01-30-2019, 11:08 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (01-30-2019, 10:25 AM)B2hibry Wrote: [ -> ]As the days pass, the Dems candidate strategy is emerging...throw it against the wall and see what sticks.
Meanwhile, when guys like Bloomberg and Schultz actually look "normal", you know they have problems.
No doubt!!
By the time the debates roll around, Twitter will have already defined the narrow range of ideas which will be allowed to be "debated".
(01-30-2019, 12:23 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]By the time the debates roll around, Twitter will have already defined the narrow range of ideas which will be allowed to be "debated".
https://twitter.com/WalkerBragman/status...29962?s=19
Suspended from twitter for sharing a video of Kamala Harris literally talking about her views on truancy
(01-30-2019, 11:36 PM)JackCity Wrote: [ -> ] (01-30-2019, 12:23 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]By the time the debates roll around, Twitter will have already defined the narrow range of ideas which will be allowed to be "debated".
https://twitter.com/WalkerBragman/status...29962?s=19
Suspended from twitter for sharing a video of Kamala Harris literally talking about her views on truancy
He's suspended. Why is not clear from what was posted.
I hope Beto runs. I frankly think he would win the Democratic nomination easily and probably destroy Trump in the election. Also, he's actually just a good person.
(01-31-2019, 06:08 PM)JaguarKick Wrote: [ -> ]I hope Beto runs. I frankly think he would win the Democratic nomination easily and probably destroy Trump in the election. Also, he's actually just a good person.
He couldn't even been Ted.
He wouldn't have a chance.
(01-31-2019, 07:48 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ] (01-31-2019, 06:08 PM)JaguarKick Wrote: [ -> ]I hope Beto runs. I frankly think he would win the Democratic nomination easily and probably destroy Trump in the election. Also, he's actually just a good person.
He couldn't even been Ted.
He wouldn't have a chance.
One can win a general election nationwide without having won a general election in a deep red state first. I don't think O'Rourke can, but it's well within the realm of possibility that a popular Democrat could win national office despite not being able to carry their deep red home state.
(01-31-2019, 07:48 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ] (01-31-2019, 06:08 PM)JaguarKick Wrote: [ -> ]I hope Beto runs. I frankly think he would win the Democratic nomination easily and probably destroy Trump in the election. Also, he's actually just a good person.
He couldn't even been Ted.
He wouldn't have a chance.
It's been over 25 years since rednexas had a Democrat Senator.
(01-31-2019, 08:37 PM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ] (01-31-2019, 07:48 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ]He couldn't even been Ted.
He wouldn't have a chance.
One can win a general election nationwide without having won a general election in a deep red state first. I don't think O'Rourke can, but it's well within the realm of possibility that a popular Democrat could win national office despite not being able to carry their deep red home state.
As much as I dislike the guy, getting within 2 points of a prominent incumbent republican in texas was a pretty good showing. I don't think he had anything to be ashamed of.
As for his chances against trump... lol. If he puts another three on the board he and Schultz are going to run away with this thing.
Add big pharma supporter Spartacus Cory Booker to the list.
Democratic Presidential candidates: left, lefter, and leftest.
And they're going ape about Schultz coming in as a self-described "centrist." They're inviting him in! They are the ones who are causing his candidacy by abandoning the middle of the electorate.
(01-31-2019, 07:48 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ] (01-31-2019, 06:08 PM)JaguarKick Wrote: [ -> ]I hope Beto runs. I frankly think he would win the Democratic nomination easily and probably destroy Trump in the election. Also, he's actually just a good person.
He couldn't even been Ted.
He wouldn't have a chance.
This means absolutely nothing. He lost by like a 3% margin in a state that is so red it hurts (apart from like, 2 population centers). I live here.
(02-01-2019, 05:42 PM)JaguarKick Wrote: [ -> ] (01-31-2019, 07:48 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: [ -> ]He couldn't even been Ted.
He wouldn't have a chance.
This means absolutely nothing. He lost by like a 3% margin in a state that is so red it hurts (apart from like, 2 population centers). I live here.
He also outspent him by $33 million.
He was close because Cruz isn't all that popular in Texas. Abbott received 400k more votes than Cruz did. Governorships always get a little bit more attention from their voters, but I'd bet you that Abbott would've destroyed Beto.