06-29-2019, 03:10 PM
(06-29-2019, 09:11 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Honest question. Can you imagine any of those candidates sitting across the table from Xi?Well thank god it wasn’t a dishonest question.
(06-29-2019, 09:11 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Honest question. Can you imagine any of those candidates sitting across the table from Xi?Well thank god it wasn’t a dishonest question.
(06-29-2019, 02:28 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]I do not trust polls. That's how we got Boaty McBoatface and Nazi Mountain Dew.
(07-07-2019, 08:14 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]It a likely to be a Harris/Warren, Warren/Harris ticket.
However, I can still see Cankles or Barry's tranny wife entering the race at the last minute after these people beat each other bloody.
Having said that, good luck beating Trump either way, and if they do, id suggest liquidating your portfolios.
(07-07-2019, 03:09 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ](07-07-2019, 08:14 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]It a likely to be a Harris/Warren, Warren/Harris ticket.
However, I can still see Cankles or Barry's tranny wife entering the race at the last minute after these people beat each other bloody.
Having said that, good luck beating Trump either way, and if they do, id suggest liquidating your portfolios.
First of all, if you want to be taken seriously you need to knock off the stupid insults and name calling.
Regarding the part in bold, I doubt it. One or the other might make it onto the ticket and if that's the case consider it a Trump win. While the MSM tries to prop both women up as much as possible, "normal" citizens see right through it and fundamentally disagree with the platform(s) they are running on. The only thing that will help them is the fact that the MSM will push the issue of the idea of a woman "breaking glass ceilings" or a black woman being in the White House not as the First Lady. I can see it now. "A vote against Warren is sexist" and "a vote against Harris is sexist and racist". Nothing to do with policy and all about gender/race.
(07-07-2019, 03:09 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ](07-07-2019, 08:14 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]It a likely to be a Harris/Warren, Warren/Harris ticket.
However, I can still see Cankles or Barry's tranny wife entering the race at the last minute after these people beat each other bloody.
Having said that, good luck beating Trump either way, and if they do, id suggest liquidating your portfolios.
First of all, if you want to be taken seriously you need to knock off the stupid insults and name calling.
Regarding the part in bold, I doubt it. One or the other might make it onto the ticket and if that's the case consider it a Trump win. While the MSM tries to prop both women up as much as possible, "normal" citizens see right through it and fundamentally disagree with the platform(s) they are running on. The only thing that will help them is the fact that the MSM will push the issue of the idea of a woman "breaking glass ceilings" or a black woman being in the White House not as the First Lady. I can see it now. "A vote against Warren is sexist" and "a vote against Harris is sexist and racist". Nothing to do with policy and all about gender/race.
(07-07-2019, 04:00 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Who else do you expect to be on the ticket exactly? Biden is toast. The hard swing to the left of these 20 candidates is setting up the perfect scenario for Hillary to swoop in as a "sane" moderate and steal the nomination. Biden was supposed to be that guy, but he sold his soul to the left and also can't string together a clear sentence.
(07-07-2019, 03:54 PM)JackCity Wrote: [ -> ](07-07-2019, 03:09 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]First of all, if you want to be taken seriously you need to knock off the stupid insults and name calling.
Regarding the part in bold, I doubt it. One or the other might make it onto the ticket and if that's the case consider it a Trump win. While the MSM tries to prop both women up as much as possible, "normal" citizens see right through it and fundamentally disagree with the platform(s) they are running on. The only thing that will help them is the fact that the MSM will push the issue of the idea of a woman "breaking glass ceilings" or a black woman being in the White House not as the First Lady. I can see it now. "A vote against Warren is sexist" and "a vote against Harris is sexist and racist". Nothing to do with policy and all about gender/race.
Aren't you the guy who said Michelle looked like an ape
(07-07-2019, 09:48 PM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ](07-07-2019, 04:00 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Who else do you expect to be on the ticket exactly? Biden is toast. The hard swing to the left of these 20 candidates is setting up the perfect scenario for Hillary to swoop in as a "sane" moderate and steal the nomination. Biden was supposed to be that guy, but he sold his soul to the left and also can't string together a clear sentence.
It's July 7th, 2019. I think there's a long way to go before this question can be reasonably asked, let alone answered.
(07-07-2019, 09:52 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ](07-07-2019, 03:54 PM)JackCity Wrote: [ -> ]Aren't you the guy who said Michelle looked like an ape
People said Bush 43 looked like an ape.
No one called him a tranny though... I feel like that's worse but I'm not sure.
(07-07-2019, 09:48 PM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ]It's July 7th, 2019. I think there's a long way to go before this question can be reasonably asked, let alone answered.
people were saying some magical unknown Republican was going to swoop in and save us from Trump... Didn't happen obviously.
I mean it's possible someone could swoop in, in either party, but has it ever actually happened? I don't think so.
(07-08-2019, 01:13 PM)Byron LeftTown Wrote: [ -> ]CNN is now so desperate for viewers that they're hosting a special event to create drama about who be invited to the next debate.
Trying to reclaim their role as kingmakers but the public isn't buying it.
Sorry, but when you try to sell Hillary Clinton as some kind of a change agent, you lose all credibility...she's as Deep State as they come.
Trump was the first nominee in 50 years from either party who was not completely owned and controlled.
The Dems think they can go back to business as usual. That ship has sailed.
(07-08-2019, 03:22 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: [ -> ]Now who's going to nuke Oklahoma?
(07-08-2019, 03:11 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo not Swalwell!
(07-08-2019, 03:52 PM)TJBender Wrote: [ -> ](07-08-2019, 03:22 PM)MalabarJag Wrote: [ -> ]Now who's going to nuke Oklahoma?
No one. Terrible use of resources. You could remove Oklahoma from the map and it would take the rest of the world two weeks to notice.