(04-08-2023, 04:35 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (04-08-2023, 01:44 PM)NH3 Wrote: [ -> ]It's Pathetic that you don't know that within an U.S. Court System, everybody is Innocent until Proven Guilty. Via. Trump's scenario many knows that he's guilty while an select few choose to ignore his guilt regardless of the Court System.
The only way that you can't see his Guilt is if you're blind.
NH3...
Clearly I understand American jurisprudence far more than you. Lol, as I said, no proof but damn if he isn't guilty!
You're being pedantic.
NH3 isn't on the jury and neither are you.
(04-08-2023, 05:08 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (04-08-2023, 04:35 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Clearly I understand American jurisprudence far more than you. Lol, as I said, no proof but damn if he isn't guilty!
You're being pedantic.
NH3 isn't on the jury and neither are you.
It doesn't matter. Trump is probably guilty of the misdemeanors. All these elites purposefully commit petty crimes all the time. It's a fine. MOST of us are fine acknowledging that. What's not ok, is for the DA to twist the facts in such a way to elevate petty crimes into felonies, just to send a message to political rival. I know that, and I'm not on the jury.
(04-08-2023, 05:08 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (04-08-2023, 04:35 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Clearly I understand American jurisprudence far more than you. Lol, as I said, no proof but damn if he isn't guilty!
You're being pedantic.
NH3 isn't on the jury and neither are you.
Lol, you calling anyone pedantic is a riot.
(04-08-2023, 07:31 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (04-08-2023, 05:08 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]You're being pedantic.
NH3 isn't on the jury and neither are you.
Lol, you calling anyone pedantic is a riot.
Exactly. You know it's bad if I'm calling you out on it.
(04-08-2023, 08:30 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ] (04-08-2023, 08:08 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Exactly. You know it's bad if I'm calling you out on it.
FIFY
Do you ever contribute any new ideas to any thread? You're just mean.
(04-08-2023, 07:10 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ] (04-08-2023, 05:08 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]You're being pedantic.
NH3 isn't on the jury and neither are you.
It doesn't matter. Trump is probably guilty of the misdemeanors. All these elites purposefully commit petty crimes all the time. It's a fine. MOST of us are fine acknowledging that. What's not ok, is for the DA to twist the facts in such a way to elevate petty crimes into felonies, just to send a message to political rival. I know that, and I'm not on the jury.
As charged, it was impossible for him to commit anything they charged him with.
IRS, SEC, DOJ, etc have all looked at it and said there was no crime.
All payments took place in 2017, so they didn't impact the election that was over.
Trump signed over his companies when he took office, so you can't charge Trump when the companies were in trusts.
All accounting was correct per all the audits.
Past case has shown there was supposedly no proof of a payment even happening.
I think the only evidence they have is the disbarred lawyer who has TDS. The lawyer pleads guilty to junk charges and then starts going after Trump.
There's more proof that the lawyer paid her off because he had sex with her.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
(04-08-2023, 11:53 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ] (04-08-2023, 07:10 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]It doesn't matter. Trump is probably guilty of the misdemeanors. All these elites purposefully commit petty crimes all the time. It's a fine. MOST of us are fine acknowledging that. What's not ok, is for the DA to twist the facts in such a way to elevate petty crimes into felonies, just to send a message to political rival. I know that, and I'm not on the jury.
As charged, it was impossible for him to commit anything they charged him with.
IRS, SEC, DOJ, etc have all looked at it and said there was no crime.
All payments took place in 2017, so they didn't impact the election that was over.
Trump signed over his companies when he took office, so you can't charge Trump when the companies were in trusts.
All accounting was correct per all the audits.
Past case has shown there was supposedly no proof of a payment even happening.
I think the only evidence they have is the disbarred lawyer who has TDS. The lawyer pleads guilty to junk charges and then starts going after Trump.
There's more proof that the lawyer paid her off because he had sex with her.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
I sure hope the trial, if there is one, is on TV, so we can see for ourselves what the evidence is.
Lol, like anyone will watch the actual trial. MOST people will get manufactured soundbites from talking heads.
(04-08-2023, 11:53 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ] (04-08-2023, 07:10 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]It doesn't matter. Trump is probably guilty of the misdemeanors. All these elites purposefully commit petty crimes all the time. It's a fine. MOST of us are fine acknowledging that. What's not ok, is for the DA to twist the facts in such a way to elevate petty crimes into felonies, just to send a message to political rival. I know that, and I'm not on the jury.
As charged, it was impossible for him to commit anything they charged him with.
IRS, SEC, DOJ, etc have all looked at it and said there was no crime.
All payments took place in 2017, so they didn't impact the election that was over.
Trump signed over his companies when he took office, so you can't charge Trump when the companies were in trusts.
All accounting was correct per all the audits.
Past case has shown there was supposedly no proof of a payment even happening.
I think the only evidence they have is the disbarred lawyer who has TDS. The lawyer pleads guilty to junk charges and then starts going after Trump.
There's more proof that the lawyer paid her off because he had sex with her.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Add one more to the list I forgot.
It is unethical and potentially illegal for a lawyer to take payments without an agreement in place, written or verbal. There were months of payments and he didn't reach out to return the money or ask why they were paying him.
Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
(04-09-2023, 05:52 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ] (04-08-2023, 11:53 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]As charged, it was impossible for him to commit anything they charged him with.
IRS, SEC, DOJ, etc have all looked at it and said there was no crime.
All payments took place in 2017, so they didn't impact the election that was over.
Trump signed over his companies when he took office, so you can't charge Trump when the companies were in trusts.
All accounting was correct per all the audits.
Past case has shown there was supposedly no proof of a payment even happening.
I think the only evidence they have is the disbarred lawyer who has TDS. The lawyer pleads guilty to junk charges and then starts going after Trump.
There's more proof that the lawyer paid her off because he had sex with her.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
I sure hope the trial, if there is one, is on TV, so we can see for ourselves what the evidence is.
I too will be looking forward to this scenario. Yes we all have our personal opinions while the facts will come out during the due process. Even then, alot of people either on this message board or throughout will still have blinders on.
Time Will Tell.
NH3...
What are the odds either of those two actually watch the hearing? I mean the whole hearing and not just the snippets?
(04-12-2023, 01:34 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]What are the odds either of those two actually watch the hearing? I mean the whole hearing and not just the snippets?
What are the odds that the new Bud Light spokesperson is really a woman?
I doubt that the "case" ever goes to trial. It's pretty obvious that this is nothing more than political overreach by the DA.
(04-12-2023, 04:08 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]I doubt that the "case" ever goes to trial. It's pretty obvious that this is nothing more than political overreach by the DA.
It depends, are we sufficiently distracted by something else while they tear apart our country and take our freedoms?
(04-12-2023, 10:21 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (04-12-2023, 05:30 AM)NH3 Wrote: [ -> ]I too will be looking forward to this scenario. Yes we all have our personal opinions while the facts will come out during the due process. Even then, alot of people either on this message board or throughout will still have blinders on.
Time Will Tell.
NH3...
Yeah, I'm sure you will. 
LMAO. I'm an Realist to which I see things/events/people for what they/we are. All we have to do is to pay attention. The True Colors will reveal themselves as they always do flsprtsgod.
NH3...
(04-08-2023, 01:44 PM)NH3 Wrote: [ -> ] (04-07-2023, 11:08 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Ooooooooo hhe's guilty, we just can't PROVE it!!!!!!
It's Pathetic that you don't know that within an U.S. Court System, everybody is Innocent until Proven Guilty. Via. Trump's scenario many knows that he's guilty while an select few choose to ignore his guilt regardless of the Court System.
The only way that you can't see his Guilt is if you're blind.
NH3...
Everybody. Hmmm. So if you are caught on video putting a cap into the brainpan of a 7-11 owner, you are innocent until proven guilty? Good to know.
(04-16-2023, 06:10 PM)NH3 Wrote: [ -> ] (04-12-2023, 10:21 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, I'm sure you will.
LMAO. I'm an Realist to which I see things/events/people for what they/we are. All we have to do is to pay attention. The True Colors will reveal themselves as they always do flsprtsgod.
NH3...
You're no realist, you're just another Trump hater wish thinking himself to sleep at night. If you were a realist seeing things as they are you'd call for Bragg's resignation.
![[Image: 20230408-171635.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/j2M0dzZ7/20230408-171635.jpg)