...and HRC doesn't suck worse?
Quote:I think you're living in an alternate universe, where the only way Trump could lose the election is if it's stolen from him in some giant conspiracy.
I think you should diversify your sources of information. Break out of that bubble you are in. Trump just happens to be the one candidate the Republicans could have nominated who could lose to Hillary Clinton. It's just bad luck that Republican voters were so stupid. Heck, I don't want Hillary Clinton, either. But at least I can see reality- Trump absolutely sucks as a candidate. If he had any self-control at all, he would have won this thing in a walk. The man has no self-control. He cannot stay on message. Now he's going off on the rest of his own party.
Admit it. The guy sucks as a candidate. The only guy who could lose a presidential election to Hillary Clinton.
It's not fixed. The voters are choosing the lesser of two evils.
i think the idea that Hillary would have lost to any other Republican nominee is naive. i would have loved Rand Paul to be the guy, but nobody seems to like him. The only other choices were Trump, Ben Carson, status quo, status quo, status quo... and the people dont want status quo.
had any of the status quo guys won the nominee, Hillary and her supporters (main stream news) would have just come up with other fake scandals to get angry about and act like THERE IS NO OTHER CHOICE BUT HILLARY
Quote:i think the idea that Hillary would have lost to any other Republican nominee is naive. i would have loved Rand Paul to be the guy, but nobody seems to like him. The only other choices were Trump, Ben Carson, status quo, status quo, status quo... and the people dont want status quo.
had any of the status quo guys won the nominee, Hillary and her supporters (main stream news) would have just come up with other fake scandals to get angry about and act like THERE IS NO OTHER CHOICE BUT HILLARY
I don't think many Dems would have crossed the aisle for any of them except Kasich.
Quote:Yeah, I found the original quote here....
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://video.genfb.com/1155592824507441'>http://video.genfb.com/1155592824507441</a>
.gif "Laughing")
Wow.
What little credibility he had left....
Down the toilet.
Quote:I think you're living in an alternate universe, where the only way Trump could lose the election is if it's stolen from him in some giant conspiracy.
I think you should diversify your sources of information. Break out of that bubble you are in. Trump just happens to be the one candidate the Republicans could have nominated who could lose to Hillary Clinton. It's just bad luck that Republican voters were so stupid. Heck, I don't want Hillary Clinton, either. But at least I can see reality- Trump absolutely sucks as a candidate. If he had any self-control at all, he would have won this thing in a walk. The man has no self-control. He cannot stay on message. Now he's going off on the rest of his own party.
Admit it. The guy sucks as a candidate. The only guy who could lose a presidential election to Hillary Clinton.
It's not fixed. The voters are choosing the lesser of two evils.
Wikileaks has demonstrated an inordinate level of collusion between the Clinton's and the News media. To say otherwise is to deny the facts at hand.
He wins a debate hands down and for the next 48 hours all we hear about is one ZINGER that some tried to compare with Hitler until the next wave of accusations comes out?
We get a tape on Friday afternoon but the entire week leading up to its release there were whispers about Martha Radditz and Anderson Cooper having mortal kombat style matches over who got to ask certain questions. I don't think they were throwing fatalities over who got to ask the question about containing Terrorism on the subcontinent. It was about who got to poison the well with the Hollywood tape. It is what it is.
When you are running against a former presidents wife its somewhat to be expected that the level of political connections will far outweigh your own and in this case it looks very much like Mr. Trump has been outplayed. That happens. But don't urinate on my leg and tell me it's raining.
Quote:...and HRC doesn't suck worse?
You can say what you want about Hillary.. she doesn't sue everyone who says something bad about her and doesn't need an army of shills to spin "what she meant" every time she opens her mouth.
Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/ny-times-gets-punked-fake-groping-victim-used-velvet-underground-song-describe-trumped-attack/'>NY Times Gets Punked=> Fake Groping Victim Used Velvet Underground Song to Describe Trumped-Up Attack</a>
:turned:
..and the woman in the People article I linked to a few posts back?
Quote:...and HRC doesn't suck worse?
Quote:Kathy shelton
And, like clockwork, the inevitable irrelevant replies.
Hillary Clinton's character has nothing to do with Trump's. Neither has much to be proud of in that regard.
Quote:..and the woman in the People article I linked to a few posts back?
She was so devastated about being assaulted years ago she decided to wait 3 weeks before the election right during a massive email leak exposing the media/DNC collusion to reveal her experience.
What she wrote looked like it came right out of a sex novel.
What was level of media trustworthiness again? It just sank another 10%.
Quote:Bill seems to think so.
Variety is the spice of life.
Yeah, it's not like when something like this comes out and people start coming out... that others who've been damaged by it come out too. I mean Bill Cosby's innocent. Right? Right?!
Quote:Yeah, it's not like when something like this comes out and people start coming out... that others who've been damaged by it come out too. I mean Bill Cosby's innocent. Right? Right?!
I mean Herman Cain's innocent. Right? Right?!
Quote:So.. it didn't happen is what you're saying?
No idea, haven't seen evidence proving it has. Innocent until proven guilty. Do we have any video or audio evidence of this assault? Pap smears? Do we have a lawsuit that was filed? Emails? Pubic hairs on the toilet? Skin cells in the fingernails?
Or we supposed to take her word for it because she is a women and deserves special treatment? :no:
Quote:No idea, haven't seen evidence proving it has. Innocent until proven guilty. Do we have any video or audio evidence of this assault? Pap smears? Do we have a lawsuit that was filed? Emails? Pubic hairs on the toilet? Skin cells in the fingernails?
Or we supposed to take her word for it because she is a women and deserves special treatment? :no:
He said vs. She said.. and she said.. and she said.. and her too.. and her.. and her.. and her..
From a guy who talks about doing precisely this (in truth or in jest -- in addition to countless other misogynist, sexist things).. who walks in on underage girls getting dressed.. who took the 5th over 50 times to get out of breaking his prenuptial agreement for infidelity..
I'm sure all of this smoke isn't coming from a fire or multiple fires.. no.. you need a [BLEEP] pap smear from a guy forcing his tongue down a woman's throat with accompanying video.. sure.. he's 100% innocent in all of these cases.
I hate having to do this. Let me say again, i hate the idea of sexual assault. It's not a joking matter, i don't condone it in any way. My beef here is that i don't believe this contrived stuff for a second.
1.) The girl on the plane talks about a miraculous move to first class, and then being groped IN PUBLIC. No witnesses just a story.
2.) The people writer... In his house while His preggers wife was upstairs and the Butler was outside? Really?
3.) Sexual assault is serious. In my view, sexual assault consists of any lewd act committed against someone's will. Male or female. IF some ramdom woman just comes up and palms my nether regions then that's assault. That's different from a romantic advance. A romantic advance would be touching of the knee kissing on the cheek or on the lips that doesn't threaten lewd activity in and of itself. If someone makes a pass at someone gets turned down and then moves on i don't see that as sexual assault, i see that's as getting shot down. If you respect the fact that a person was just that into you despite misreading rapport or friendliness than i don't think that's a crime. Now, if someone just walks into a room and you are petting little bill then that's another story...
And this goes beyond this case or this election. A friend that tries a kiss in the middle of a sentence isn't a rapist.