Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Quote:You can do whatever you want Kotite, whatever makes you feel good. Just pointing out how we have been through the whole "lets" issue already, at length. It didn't end well for you so I'm not sure why you think it carries any weight?

Maybe, but unfortunately for Donald many of the women didn't agree with the "let's". So what now? Of course he strolls the city for teens looking for his next girlfriend in 10 years anyhow!

Quote:What is it about him that makes you think this is beyond him at all? He is lewd. He is uncontrollable. He says he does this and women "let" him. He wasn't cheating on previous wives? He wasn't making those comments at this exact same time? It's hardly outside the realm of what one would think possible given his track record of actions and statements.

Here's your big chance JC.. show me how the post you are calling into question is any any way invalid. The above post was in response to whether or not there is reason to believe the one claim I referenced could be plausible. (That he would choose to force himself on another woman with his pregnant wife in the house).


Go on.. show me how any of this post is not directly relevant including the reference to his own words.

Quote:Maybe you can get ahold of her summers eve disposals , take a whiff and you tell us.


In this case,it seems he admits this kind of action. She verified.


Other than that. I'm sick of it all from both camps. This thin skinned fool fell for the trap. TPP. Border protection. Higher wages. Job creation. If he kept hammering at this, he makes headway.

No. He has to retaliate. Counter punch. Bring up Bill.


This election is a farce. An embarrassment. An example for the rest of the world that we are far from the shining example.

These two belong on Jerry Springer, not on a campaign trail.

Sadly. America loves this shtick.

 

Don't act like you didn't see this coming. Americans say they want to talk about policies, but the media decides its better to talk about ludicrous scandals and smears and idiotic American's eat it all up. Only difference is many are finally get tired of it and MSM ratings are dropping like a rock.

 

Lets see, does the media want to talk about the use of vulgar language, or does it want to talk about actual evidence of government corruption and quid pro quo...

 



 

 

Polls show America's biggest fear is government corruption, and the media doesn't even want to talk about it.

 

And certain clowns on this board claim there is no bias in the media

Quote:Here's your big chance JC.. show me how the post you are calling into question is any any way invalid. The above post was in response to whether or not there is reason to believe the one claim I referenced could be plausible. (That he would choose to force himself on another woman with his pregnant wife in the house).


Go on.. show me how any of this post is not directly relevant including the reference to his own words.

Poor Kotite, I didn't say it was "invalid" or "not directly relevant".


You said.


"Not sure how anything in my last post is remotely related to the circular discussion from earlier in the thread or how that discussion has any bearing on this unrelated post"


I mentioned that your use of "lets" is directly related to the discussion earlier in the thread.

Quote:Poor Kotite, I didn't say it was "invalid" or "not directly relevant".


You said.


"Not sure how anything in my last post is remotely related to the circular discussion from earlier in the thread or how that discussion has any bearing on this unrelated post"


I mentioned that your use of "lets" is directly related to the discussion earlier in the thread.

Are you seriously going to police my use of the word "let" in this thread and tie every mention as a reference to an argument as to whether or not Trump's one side of the story legitimately means these women all "let" him touch/grope them? For real.. how big of an erection do you have for me?

Quote:Don't act like you didn't see this coming. Americans say they want to talk about policies, but the media decides its better to talk about ludicrous scandals and smears and idiotic American's eat it all up. Only difference is many are finally get tired of it and MSM ratings are dropping like a rock.


Lets see, does the media want to talk about the use of vulgar language, or does it want to talk about actual evidence of government corruption and quid pro quo...





Polls show America's biggest fear is government corruption, and the media doesn't even want to talk about it.


And certain clowns on this board claim there is no bias in the media

Let me know when something relevant comes from Wikileaks. They leak stuff but nothing has changed. Snowden gave his freedom and yet America still monitors its citizens.

Quote:Are you seriously going to police my use of the word "let" in this thread and tie every mention as a reference to an argument as to whether or not Trump's one side of the story legitimately means these women all "let" him touch/grope them? For real.. how big of an erection do you have for me?

Your use of "let" is a direct reference to Trumps words yes or no?


Do you have a weird fixation on other men's erections? Between this and the whole "flatter than a 12 year old" thing it seems like this is where the root of where your inferiority complex lies?

Quote:Your use of "let" is a direct reference to Trumps words yes or no?


Do you have a weird fixation on other men's erections? Between this and the whole "flatter than a 12 year old" thing it seems like this is where the root of where your inferiority complex lies?

Hey.. you're the one who has wood for me guy.. I'm flattered, but it's only fair to tell you now, it's never gonna happen.


Yes.. I am using Trump's statement that he claims women let him grope/kiss them because he is such a [BLEEP] star as supportive evidence that there is the potential for the woman I referenced to be telling the truth (that Trump made a move on her).


How is that associated to an argument that Trump's one side of the story does not necessarily mean all of these encounters are consensual (without knowing anything more about any of these incidents or even getting a woman's version of events)? Especially in an instance where I HAVE provided a woman's opposing view of an incident.


Poor Jack City, he cannot connect the dots.

Quote:Let me know when something relevant comes from Wikileaks. They leak stuff but nothing has changed
. Snowden gave his freedom and yet America still monitors its citizens.

The reason for this:  "
Snowden gave his freedom and yet America still monitors its citizen
s"

 

Is because of attitudes like this:  "
Let me know when something relevant comes from Wikileaks. They leak stuff but nothing has changed."


 

It is so disheartening to me that we as American Citizens have come to accept this as "oh it is just politics"  I don't know about you but I deserve better than either one of these corrupt individuals leading our country.  Nothing has changed because we allow it to happen.  

Quote:Hey.. you're the one who has wood for me guy.. I'm flattered, but it's only fair to tell you now, it's never gonna happen.


Yes.. I am using Trump's statement that he claims women let him grope/kiss them because he is such a [BAD WORD REMOVED] star as supportive evidence that there is the potential for the woman I referenced to be telling the truth (that Trump made a move on her).


How is that associated to an argument that Trump's one side of the story does not necessarily mean all of these encounters are consensual (without knowing anything more about any of these incidents or even getting a woman's version of events)? Especially in an instance where I HAVE provided a woman's opposing view of an incident.


Poor Jack City, he cannot connect the dots.

But you just said your post was not remotely related to the discussion about Trump saying "lets" earlier in the thread...now it is?


Again you should read what you type as it doesn't make sense to anybody but you.


I have no opinion on what the other incident is you are talking about. No interest in batting for Trump on all of his issues.

Quote:But you just said your post was not remotely related to the discussion about Trump saying "lets" earlier in the thread...now it is?


Again you should read what you type as it doesn't make sense to anybody but you.


I have no opinion on what the other incident is you are talking about. No interest in batting for Trump on all of his issues.

Okay for real.. embarrassing yourself. The post you felt compelled to comment on was totally fine without your love notes. Everyone but you sees it.

Quote:Okay for real.. embarrassing yourself. The post you felt compelled to comment on was totally fine without your love notes. Everyone but you sees it.

In other words you have nothing to say in reply. You're not fooling anybody but yourself.

Quote:In other words you have nothing to say in reply. You're not fooling anybody but yourself.

I'm trying to let you down easy because I know how much it can hurt when you have a hardcore crush on someone who doesn't feel the same way about you.


You lied in wait for me to post something and tried to make a cute joke to get my attention. You are unable to connect the comments I made in the post you chimed in on to the crux of the argument I finally got sick of fighting after the tenth circular reference. Me using Trump's own words as supportive evidence the woman's story may hold water has no relation to the argument I posed that only having one side of a story is inconclusive.


So get on Tinder or Grindr or just take some lotion to the bathroom and do what you need to do to move on with your life. Your obsession with me is unhealthy.


Or you can continue to look foolish by further embarrassing yourself trying to connect these two dots.

Quote:You can do whatever you want Kotite, whatever makes you feel good. Just pointing out how we have been through the whole "lets" issue already, at length. It didn't end well for you so I'm not sure why you think it carries any weight?

 

Maybe I missed it...  But if you think that the "let" discussion resulted in the position of the trumpettes described as the victor has lost their ever loving mind...  No disrespect to you personally Jackcity...

Quote:But you just said your post was not remotely related to the discussion about Trump saying "lets" earlier in the thread...now it is?


Again you should read what you type as it doesn't make sense to anybody but you.


I have no opinion on what the other incident is you are talking about. No interest in batting for Trump on all of his issues.

 

Oh dear.  You really think the "lets" arguement is a strong one for trump?  That's just sad.  

Quote:Or you can continue to look foolish by further embarrassing yourself trying to connect these two dots.

 

This is the quintessential talent of the trumpette.  Enjoy it in all its glory

Quote:Did you write this? Or copy/paste? 

 

Brooklyn and ByronLefttown are actually false flag operations created by the government.  Thier avatars have been confrirmed to be paid actors and the people that write thier posts are not humans at all--- but  trained monkeys!  The same monkeys that wrote a Shakespearian play in 1 month after being locked in a room with nothing but coffee and cigarrettes.   :thumbsup:

 

Also the former poster known at TMD (TheMadDog) is actually a former NSA agent that got too close to the Clintons.  He was not perma-banned from The Jungle, in fact he was assassinated and his twitter handle is a shell of his former self as a deterrent to those like Brooklyn and ByronLeftTown to never cross the illuminati... 

 

True story.  

Quote:I'm trying to let you down easy because I know how much it can hurt when you have a hardcore crush on someone who doesn't feel the same way about you.


You lied in wait for me to post something and tried to make a cute joke to get my attention. You are unable to connect the comments I made in the post you chimed in on to the crux of the argument I finally got sick of fighting after the tenth circular reference. Me using Trump's own words as supportive evidence the woman's story may hold water has no relation to the argument I posed that only having one side of a story is inconclusive.


So get on Tinder or Grindr or just take some lotion to the bathroom and do what you need to do to move on with your life. Your obsession with me is unhealthy.


Or you can continue to look foolish by further embarrassing yourself trying to connect these two dots.

Except that's not what happened. You made up an argument based on a post from Bunnie which you didn't/couldn't understand. Then refused to admit fault and made a show out of yourself.



Using Trumps "lets" quote is related to the discussion a few pages previous about Trumps "lets" quote wether you like it or not.


Its interesting that you use sexuality and erotic concepts in debate and argument. Projecting your own insecurities into the public domain is admirable Kotite.

Quote:Oh dear. You really think the "lets" arguement is a strong one for trump? That's just sad.

No its not my argument.

Quote:This is the quintessential talent of the trumpette. Enjoy it in all its glory

I'm not a Trumpette/liberal/democrat/Republican/Conservative/libertarian/Green Party


Try again though sir.