(11-15-2020, 02:14 AM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-14-2020, 11:35 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Joel Bidens America. Buckle up.
Geez man.
(11-15-2020, 01:45 AM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]Trump's America
![[Image: 0ea2b8047c0d165d7f58cd7f61f33926?width=650]](https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/0ea2b8047c0d165d7f58cd7f61f33926?width=650)
2 dead thanks to an AR-15 style rifle
Not even the same. He was defending himself. Should he have been there? Probably not, but he did not instigate things.
Defending himself? He had no business being there. He had no business walking around public streets with a rifle either. He had no property to defend, because he didn't even live or work there. He wasn't in law enforcement either. He instigated things by cruising around a place he didn't live or had no business being at with a loaded weapon. He is obviously mentally ill. Normal people don't act this way. Responsible gun owners don't act this way and he's giving the rest of us a bad name.
(11-15-2020, 01:45 AM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]Trump's America
![[Image: 0ea2b8047c0d165d7f58cd7f61f33926?width=650]](https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/0ea2b8047c0d165d7f58cd7f61f33926?width=650)
2 dead thanks to an AR-15 style rifle
And the 3rd had to learn to watch pornhub with his left hand.
(11-15-2020, 06:12 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2020, 02:14 AM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]Geez man.
Not even the same. He was defending himself. Should he have been there? Probably not, but he did not instigate things.
Defending himself? He had no business being there. He had no business walking around public streets with a rifle either. He had no property to defend, because he didn't even live or work there. He wasn't in law enforcement either. He instigated things by cruising around a place he didn't live or had no business being at with a loaded weapon. He is obviously mentally ill. Normal people don't act this way. Responsible gun owners don't act this way and he's giving the rest of us a bad name.
When his case is dismissed, I expect a full apology.
Now, please comment on the defenless old men getting attacked on the streets by BLM and ANTIFA.
(11-15-2020, 02:14 AM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-14-2020, 11:35 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Joel Bidens America. Buckle up.
Geez man.
(11-15-2020, 01:45 AM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]Trump's America
![[Image: 0ea2b8047c0d165d7f58cd7f61f33926?width=650]](https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/0ea2b8047c0d165d7f58cd7f61f33926?width=650)
2 dead thanks to an AR-15 style rifle
Not even the same. He was defending himself. Should he have been there? Probably not, but he did not instigate things.
Yep. He was actually there HELPING people. Just wait for the trial, then a whole lot of people will look even dumber than they already look. Ton of video evidence for those that wish to seek it
Another case of a left wing [BLEEP] acting in the cowardly manner that they are accustomed to. Sucker punch and then run like the [BLEEP] roach that he is.
(11-15-2020, 11:34 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]Another case of a left wing [BLEEP] acting in the cowardly manner that they are accustomed to. Sucker punch and then run like the [BLEEP] roach that he is.
The people defending it or not acknowledging it are the people you really need to watch out for.
To be fair, the dude in the browns jacket was roughing up that crowd pretty decently before getting sicker punched. Don't get me wrong, I think he's got a right to stand his ground and defend himself, but when one of our resident lefties stumbles upon the full clip of that altercation, they are going to suggest you weren't showing the incident in its full context.
Political violence is when people are prevented from voting or running for office, or when the act of running for office makes them a target for prosecution or harassment.
Those two videos dont show political violence. No one is voting. No one is running for office
The videos show hooliganism.
Hooliganism can injure or kill, but it has no purpose, and it poses no danger to the republic.
(11-15-2020, 11:49 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]To be fair, the dude in the browns jacket was roughing up that crowd pretty decently before getting sicker punched. Don't get me wrong, I think he's got a right to stand his ground and defend himself, but when one of our resident lefties stumbles upon the full clip of that altercation, they are going to suggest you weren't showing the incident in its full context.
No amount of context justifies jumping a guy from behind as he walks away.
(11-15-2020, 12:06 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Political violence is when people are prevented from voting or running for office, or when the act of running for office makes them a target for prosecution or harassment.
Those two videos dont show political violence. No one is voting. No one is running for office
The videos show hooliganism.
Hooliganism can injure or kill, but it has no purpose, and it poses no danger to the republic.
Then you have people like Mikesez who has to put out his own eyes so he can insist that what we all see isn't what we saw.
(11-15-2020, 12:08 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2020, 11:49 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]To be fair, the dude in the browns jacket was roughing up that crowd pretty decently before getting sicker punched. Don't get me wrong, I think he's got a right to stand his ground and defend himself, but when one of our resident lefties stumbles upon the full clip of that altercation, they are going to suggest you weren't showing the incident in its full context.
No amount of context justifies jumping a guy from behind as he walks away.
Agreed.
If they figure out who did it, he should be prosecuted for assault.
(11-15-2020, 12:08 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-15-2020, 12:06 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Political violence is when people are prevented from voting or running for office, or when the act of running for office makes them a target for prosecution or harassment.
Those two videos dont show political violence. No one is voting. No one is running for office
The videos show hooliganism.
Hooliganism can injure or kill, but it has no purpose, and it poses no danger to the republic.
Then you have people like Mikesez who has to put out his own eyes so he can insist that what we all see isn't what we saw.
Those videos are no worse than what might happen to you if you wear Chelsea gear in Tottenham on gameday or Giants gear in Philly on gameday. It's stupid and the police should punish it, but it's not any kind of danger to the republic.
(11-15-2020, 01:45 AM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]Trump's America
![[Image: 0ea2b8047c0d165d7f58cd7f61f33926?width=650]](https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/0ea2b8047c0d165d7f58cd7f61f33926?width=650)
2 dead thanks to an AR-15 style rifle
Three criminal assailants prevented from injuring a guy with whom they picked a fight.
(11-15-2020, 12:10 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2020, 12:08 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]No amount of context justifies jumping a guy from behind as he walks away.
Agreed.
If they figure out who did it, he should be prosecuted for assault.
(11-15-2020, 12:08 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]
Then you have people like Mikesez who has to put out his own eyes so he can insist that what we all see isn't what we saw.
Those videos are no worse than what might happen to you if you wear Chelsea gear in Manchester on gameday or Giants gear in Philly on gameday. It's stupid and the police should punish it, but it's not any kind of danger to the republic.
Uh huh, sure.
(11-15-2020, 09:39 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2020, 01:45 AM)captivating Wrote: [ -> ]Trump's America
![[Image: 0ea2b8047c0d165d7f58cd7f61f33926?width=650]](https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/0ea2b8047c0d165d7f58cd7f61f33926?width=650)
2 dead thanks to an AR-15 style rifle
And the 3rd had to learn to watch pornhub with his left hand.
(11-15-2020, 06:12 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Defending himself? He had no business being there. He had no business walking around public streets with a rifle either. He had no property to defend, because he didn't even live or work there. He wasn't in law enforcement either. He instigated things by cruising around a place he didn't live or had no business being at with a loaded weapon. He is obviously mentally ill. Normal people don't act this way. Responsible gun owners don't act this way and he's giving the rest of us a bad name.
When his case is dismissed, I expect a full apology.
Now, please comment on the defenless old men getting attacked on the streets by BLM and ANTIFA.
You'll be waiting a long time, because I will never give one. Whether or not he is acquitted, my opinion stays the same.
As far as the other video, I need context. What was the old man doing or saying? Was this some kind of rally? It was just a snippet of some old guy getting hit with no backstory or detail. I need to know much more before I form an opinion on it.
Do you people seriously have nothing better to do on a beautiful Sunday than to argue over videos of immature dolts hurting each other?
(11-15-2020, 09:52 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2020, 02:14 AM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]Geez man.
Not even the same. He was defending himself. Should he have been there? Probably not, but he did not instigate things.
Yep. He was actually there HELPING people. Just wait for the trial, then a whole lot of people will look even dumber than they already look. Ton of video evidence for those that wish to seek it
It's not his job to help people. He doesn't live there, he isn't law enforcement and he has no business carry a semi-automatic rifle in public like he's John Rambo! He's just some moronic kid who played Call of Duty one too many times and now he thinks he's a vigilante.
(11-15-2020, 12:29 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2020, 09:52 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]Yep. He was actually there HELPING people. Just wait for the trial, then a whole lot of people will look even dumber than they already look. Ton of video evidence for those that wish to seek it
It's not his job to help people. He doesn't live there, he isn't law enforcement and he has no business carry a semi-automatic rifle in public like he's John Rambo! He's just some moronic kid who played Call of Duty one too many times and now he thinks he's a vigilante.
The people that were supposed to be helping people were held down by state and local leadership.
I thought this thread was about the Election.
I guess it's officially over in the minds of those posting to this thread since the subject matter seems to have been diverted.
(11-15-2020, 12:36 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2020, 12:29 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]It's not his job to help people. He doesn't live there, he isn't law enforcement and he has no business carry a semi-automatic rifle in public like he's John Rambo! He's just some moronic kid who played Call of Duty one too many times and now he thinks he's a vigilante.
The people that were supposed to be helping people were held down by state and local leadership.
And.........? It's still not his job! He shouldn't have been there, period!
(11-15-2020, 12:44 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2020, 12:36 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]The people that were supposed to be helping people were held down by state and local leadership.
And.........? It's still not his job! He shouldn't have been there, period!
Who should be there exactly?
(11-15-2020, 12:42 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: [ -> ]I thought this thread was about the Election.
I guess it's officially over in the minds of those posting to this thread since the subject matter seems to have been diverted.
Yep! It's over. The fat lady has sung!
(11-15-2020, 12:45 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-15-2020, 12:44 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]And.........? It's still not his job! He shouldn't have been there, period!
Who should be there exactly?
Not that dumb kid.
Well, we definitely know who the Quislings among us are.