I'm becoming more convinced that Trump's team can make a solid case. Really improbable data sets occurring in voting patterns. I'll be curious to see how this plays out, but the evidence is looking stronger. If they have any key witnesses, this could get interesting.
(11-16-2020, 11:38 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]I'm becoming more convinced that Trump's team can make a solid case. Really improbable data sets occurring in voting patterns. I'll be curious to see how this plays out, but the evidence is looking stronger. If they have any key witnesses, this could get interesting.
Can you imagine the riots when they have to abolish the office of the president elect...
It's going to be rough if they get this thing overturned. If they can prove half of what Sidney Powell has claimed in the last 24 hours, the Trump team has a real case.
(11-16-2020, 11:50 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2020, 11:45 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]It's going to be rough if they get this thing overturned. If they can prove half of what Sidney Powell has claimed in the last 24 hours, the Trump team has a real case.
You're clueless. There is no evidence... they can trace every vote back to a person. Skewed data sets are just that... skewed. For a number of reasons that have been stated on this board. You're desires and bias are embarrassingly flawing your logic. Go to bed.
You need to get laid dude. You are mean. A week on the oil rig in the gulf makes a man [BLEEP]. Go get you some.
You think this dude could make it a week on an oil rig? Lol.
(11-16-2020, 11:52 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2020, 11:50 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: [ -> ]You're clueless. There is no evidence... they can trace every vote back to a person. Skewed data sets are just that... skewed. For a number of reasons that have been stated on this board. You're desires and bias are embarrassingly flawing your logic. Go to bed.
You need to get laid dude. You are mean. A week on the oil rig in the gulf makes a man [BLEEP]. Go get you some.
I thought liberals were the sensitives ones. Buckle up sissy.
.gif "Laughing")
Some real-life facts for you:
"The lawsuits admitted they didn't have evidence of voter fraud -- and instead believed "expert" reports might later show illegal votes. "This evidence will be shortly forthcoming when the relevant official documents are final and available," each of the lawsuits said in their initial filings last week. The expert reports apparently never materialized."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/16/politics/...index.html
(11-16-2020, 11:55 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2020, 11:52 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ]You need to get laid dude. You are mean. A week on the oil rig in the gulf makes a man [BLEEP]. Go get you some.
I thought liberals were the sensitives ones. Buckle up sissy.
Some real-life facts for you:
"The lawsuits admitted they didn't have evidence of voter fraud -- and instead believed "expert" reports might later show illegal votes. "This evidence will be shortly forthcoming when the relevant official documents are final and available," each of the lawsuits said in their initial filings last week. The expert reports apparently never materialized."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/16/politics/...index.html
Real life facts followed by a link to CNN .
Take the L and go to bed.
(11-16-2020, 11:58 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2020, 11:55 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: [ -> ]I thought liberals were the sensitives ones. Buckle up sissy.
Some real-life facts for you:
"The lawsuits admitted they didn't have evidence of voter fraud -- and instead believed "expert" reports might later show illegal votes. "This evidence will be shortly forthcoming when the relevant official documents are final and available," each of the lawsuits said in their initial filings last week. The expert reports apparently never materialized."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/16/politics/...index.html
Real life facts followed by a link to CNN .
Take the L and go to bed.
Coming from the guy who cites NewsMaxx?
Quotes taken directly from the judges transcripts. Try educating yourself.
(11-16-2020, 11:58 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2020, 11:55 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: [ -> ]I thought liberals were the sensitives ones. Buckle up sissy.
Some real-life facts for you:
"The lawsuits admitted they didn't have evidence of voter fraud -- and instead believed "expert" reports might later show illegal votes. "This evidence will be shortly forthcoming when the relevant official documents are final and available," each of the lawsuits said in their initial filings last week. The expert reports apparently never materialized."
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/16/politics/...index.html
Real life facts followed by a link to CNN .
Take the L and go to bed.
Trump got the "L." He just refuses to accept reality.
(11-16-2020, 11:38 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]I'm becoming more convinced that Trump's team can make a solid case. Really improbable data sets occurring in voting patterns. I'll be curious to see how this plays out, but the evidence is looking stronger. If they have any key witnesses, this could get interesting.
I'm sure there are certain instances in each state that one can point to but he got pretty whooped across the board so nothing will be overturned. Heck, Hillary had a stronger election result than Trump did against Biden.
(11-16-2020, 02:36 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2020, 02:26 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting viewpoint
https://mobile.twitter.com/DineshDSouza/...9875660801
Sent from my SM-T820 using Tapatalk
Seriously dude, it's over. The fat lady has sung. The Democrats are taking over the White House at the first of the year. Nothing is gonna stop that. You may hate it, (I don't care either way, because I hate both parties,) but it's still gonna happen. We just all need to accept it and move on with our lives.
Acceptance is not the issue at this point. If there is potential for these machines to hacked or manipulated that is a serious issue and needs to be addressed regardless of who won.
(11-17-2020, 10:20 AM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ] (11-16-2020, 02:36 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Seriously dude, it's over. The fat lady has sung. The Democrats are taking over the White House at the first of the year. Nothing is gonna stop that. You may hate it, (I don't care either way, because I hate both parties,) but it's still gonna happen. We just all need to accept it and move on with our lives.
Acceptance is not the issue at this point. If there is potential for these machines to hacked or manipulated that is a serious issue and needs to be addressed regardless of who won.
The people willing to rush this thing through and just turn their heads the other way is somewhat surprising to me.
(11-17-2020, 10:26 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (11-17-2020, 10:20 AM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ]Acceptance is not the issue at this point. If there is potential for these machines to hacked or manipulated that is a serious issue and needs to be addressed regardless of who won.
The people willing to rush this thing through and just turn their heads the other way is somewhat surprising to me.
The sheep who keep parroting baseless conspiracies that have been pushed for 4 years by their shepherd to protect his ego need to pull their heads out of their butts. His lawsuits are an embarrassing 1-24 in courts as of this morning. Law firms that were representing him are bailing left and right because they don't want to be associated with factless claims that hurt democracy.
You losers are hilarious.
You said a lot of nothing. We already know how you feel.
Sidney Powell, for the first time, is pushing extreme ideas that are outside of the run-of-the-mill stuff we heard initially from Giuliani. If she can prove it, which is a tall order (but she says she can), we are talking about something completely different that voter fraud. She's either throwing her career down the drain for a few minutes of fame (entirely probable), or she has data that is actually condemning, not just of our electoral process, but our government as well. To the degree that Sidney Powell is credible is the degree to which I think this can be overturned. You can keep slapping your knees if you want, but a lot of Trump's cases were always going to get tossed. You keep saying we are sheep, while citing sources that have proven to lie over and over again.
I have seen the Trump administration posture before, so I would never put money on an outcome. There is a very solid chance they are just beating their chest and they found their stooge. But, like I said before, I was looking at the numbers really closely after election night, and there are such irregularities that I know something is amiss. Other people have run numbers that look extremely improbable, but I haven't confirmed, so I am not reposting them. We just need to see how this plays out, but I think your confidence is a bit overstated.
I'm glad Trump is taking Hillary's advice, I think the danger of compromised elections is worth at least 2 years and $40 million dollars' worth of investigation.
(11-17-2020, 03:58 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]You said a lot of nothing. We already know how you feel.
Sidney Powell, for the first time, is pushing extreme ideas that are outside of the run-of-the-mill stuff we heard initially from Giuliani. If she can prove it, which is a tall order (but she says she can), we are talking about something completely different that voter fraud. She's either throwing her career down the drain for a few minutes of fame (entirely probable), or she has data that is actually condemning, not just of our electoral process, but our government as well. To the degree that Sidney Powell is credible is the degree to which I think this can be overturned. You can keep slapping your knees if you want, but a lot of Trump's cases were always going to get tossed. You keep saying we are sheep, while citing sources that have proven to lie over and over again.
I have seen the Trump administration posture before, so I would never put money on an outcome. There is a very solid chance they are just beating their chest and they found their stooge. But, like I said before, I was looking at the numbers really closely after election night, and there are such irregularities that I know something is amiss. Other people have run numbers that look extremely improbable, but I haven't confirmed, so I am not reposting them. We just need to see how this plays out, but I think your confidence is a bit overstated.
For a guy who so desperately wants to be perceived as an intellectual, you need to do better than making weak ad hominem attacks on sources, and instead focus on the facts of what is presented. Trump's legal teams are 1-24 in election lawsuits. Judges are literally laughing at their arguments in court. Law firms are bailing on them left and right because the credible ones don't want to be associated with their circus. Sidney Powell is an extreme right winger and doesn't care about credibility with the general public... she only wants her name out there as a champion to the extreme right. You will see this dog and pony show is just another nothing-burger, but you will not admit that when it is realized. You already think something is there before any evidence is presented because your logic is blinded by your bias, and that causes you to make your simple-minded statements. Do better if you want to be taken seriously in any intellectual way.
(11-17-2020, 04:42 PM)JackCity Wrote: [ -> ]Trump continuing to take daily losses after already losing the presidency is fun
https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/13...52448?s=19
Thanks for the update. Wow... 1-25. To put that in perspective, both Gene Smith and David Caldwell's winning percentages are about 10 times better than that.
(11-17-2020, 04:45 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: [ -> ] (11-17-2020, 04:42 PM)JackCity Wrote: [ -> ]Trump continuing to take daily losses after already losing the presidency is fun
https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/13...52448?s=19
Thanks for the update. Wow... 1-25. To put that in perspective, both Gene Smith and David Caldwell's winning percentages are about 10 times better than that.
Weird to see a regular winner like Trump losing so bad