(12-01-2020, 11:13 AM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2020, 10:31 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Correct me if I'm wrong, but my impression is, in Georgia, people filled out paper ballots, which were fed into a machine and counted by the machine. After the election, they did a hand recount of the paper ballots, not using the machines at all, and the hand recount confirmed the machine count. Am I wrong? What's the point of examining the machines if they took the machines completely out of the process and hand counted the ballots?
It doesn't appear they hand counted it, unless I read something wrong. I think they reprocessed the paper copy through the same machines. They did some type of hand count but it was limited and not official, there are reports they were told to just report the 1st numbers.
They vote on touch screen and then it prints a copy and is read.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
(12-01-2020, 09:27 AM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: [ -> ]Personally, I think Trump is destroying his chance of being re-elected in 2024 should he seek another term. Another fact of the matter is that most of the youth really don't like him and in another 4 years some of the aging population that favor Trump will be dead whereas the current high school kids that will be eligible to vote favor the Dems. Trump was so polarizing that he invigorated our youth (in a non-favorable way for him).
Nightmare scenario for the left, Trump suspends the election until everything is resolved with treason investigation and trials. He stays the president because of the corruption at the top levels. Then after 2-3 years he declares time for elections and he wins in a landslide for his 2nd term.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
Cocaine is a heck of a drug.
(12-01-2020, 11:47 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2020, 11:13 AM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]It doesn't appear they hand counted it, unless I read something wrong. I think they reprocessed the paper copy through the same machines. They did some type of hand count but it was limited and not official, there are reports they were told to just report the 1st numbers.
They vote on touch screen and then it prints a copy and is read.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
No, it was a full hand recount of all 5 million ballots. They didn't check the entire ballot, only the presidential choice.
People who voted in person used touch screens, which then generated a paper ballot so people could check for a mistake. Those paper ballots, along with absentee ballots, were all recounted by hand. So a machine cannot possibly change votes, because they generate paper records which are checked by the voter and then turned in, and which can be audited in a full hand recount, which Georgia did.
So there's no way a voting machine could have changed any votes without it being detected in the recount.
Looks like the one happening now is using the machines.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
(12-01-2020, 12:27 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2020, 11:13 AM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]It doesn't appear they hand counted it, unless I read something wrong. I think they reprocessed the paper copy through the same machines. They did some type of hand count but it was limited and not official, there are reports they were told to just report the 1st numbers.
They vote on touch screen and then it prints a copy and is read.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
Nightmare scenario for the left, Trump suspends the election until everything is resolved with treason investigation and trials. He stays the president because of the corruption at the top levels. Then after 2-3 years he declares time for elections and he wins in a landslide for his 2nd term.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
Cocaine is a heck of a drug.
I'm not saying it will happen, but supposedly it is an option somehow. Normally the speaker of the house would be temporarily in charge, but if they are part of the fraud somehow Trump would keep power.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
(12-01-2020, 11:13 AM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2020, 10:31 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Correct me if I'm wrong, but my impression is, in Georgia, people filled out paper ballots, which were fed into a machine and counted by the machine. After the election, they did a hand recount of the paper ballots, not using the machines at all, and the hand recount confirmed the machine count. Am I wrong? What's the point of examining the machines if they took the machines completely out of the process and hand counted the ballots?
It doesn't appear they hand counted it, unless I read something wrong. I think they reprocessed the paper copy through the same machines. They did some type of hand count but it was limited and not official, there are reports they were told to just report the 1st numbers.
They vote on touch screen and then it prints a copy and is read.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
You?!? NOOOOOOOO...... not possible!
.gif "Laughing")
(12-01-2020, 12:34 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2020, 11:47 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]No, it was a full hand recount of all 5 million ballots. They didn't check the entire ballot, only the presidential choice.
People who voted in person used touch screens, which then generated a paper ballot so people could check for a mistake. Those paper ballots, along with absentee ballots, were all recounted by hand. So a machine cannot possibly change votes, because they generate paper records which are checked by the voter and then turned in, and which can be audited in a full hand recount, which Georgia did.
So there's no way a voting machine could have changed any votes without it being detected in the recount.
Looks like the one happening now is using the machines.
That's the second recount. The first recount was entirely by hand.
(12-01-2020, 11:13 AM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]
(12-01-2020, 09:27 AM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: [ -> ]Personally, I think Trump is destroying his chance of being re-elected in 2024 should he seek another term. Another fact of the matter is that most of the youth really don't like him and in another 4 years some of the aging population that favor Trump will be dead whereas the current high school kids that will be eligible to vote favor the Dems. Trump was so polarizing that he invigorated our youth (in a non-favorable way for him).
Nightmare scenario for the left, Trump suspends the election until everything is resolved with treason investigation and trials. He stays the president because of the corruption at the top levels. Then after 2-3 years he declares time for elections and he wins in a landslide for his 2nd term.
Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
I don't think you understand. Check out the link below that includes age group voting chart.....
High school kids pretty much hate Trump. All those kids will be eligible to vote in 2024.
Old white people pretty much love Trump. A lot of those people will be dead in 2024.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1184...es-age-us/
(12-01-2020, 12:34 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2020, 12:19 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]Don’t act like a troll and you won’t get treated like a troll. 
I'll behave how I believe is appropriate for the circumstance. If that gets me banned by sensitive regulation (something that conservatives, like you, supposedly oppose), so be it. Your board will become quite boring and monolithic very quickly.
Not sure how this board ever survived before you joined a whopping 4 months ago.
(12-01-2020, 02:33 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2020, 12:34 PM)NeptuneBeachBum Wrote: [ -> ]I'll behave how I believe is appropriate for the circumstance. If that gets me banned by sensitive regulation (something that conservatives, like you, supposedly oppose), so be it. Your board will become quite boring and monolithic very quickly.
Not sure how this board ever survived before you joined a whopping 4 months ago.
Oh, it will definitely survive. It will just be a lot more boring and a lot less knowledgeable. You'd be stroking your buddies' insane conspiracy theories and ganging up on MikeSez, even though he's the only one consistently displaying any degree of intellectualism here. But you'd survive.
(12-01-2020, 02:30 PM)KodiakJag Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2020, 01:03 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]You are giving yourself and your posts way too much credit.
He's correct, though. If he left all we'd have to look forward to is Mike getting harassed daily by SC/FSG/TP/JJ/TFW etc. It's much better with NBB around to balance things out a bit.
Thank you. I rest my case.
Yo. My man DGA you know what hahaha
Coming out swinging.
(12-01-2020, 03:06 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Yo. My man DGA you know what hahaha
Coming out swinging.
See? Another one that would miss me! lol
Oh, God, Bill Barr is so fired.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/01/politics/...index.html
William Barr says there is no evidence of widespread fraud in presidential election
The Justice Department hasn't found evidence to support allegations of widespread fraud that could have changed the result of last month's presidential election, Attorney General William Barr said in an interview with the Associated Press published Tuesday.
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election," Barr said.
Barr, who prior to the election echoed President Donald Trump's claims that mail-in voting wasn't secure, said both the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security have looked into claims of fraud and come up empty.
"There's been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results," Barr said. "And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven't seen anything to substantiate that."
(12-01-2020, 05:09 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, God, Bill Barr is so fired.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/01/politics/...index.html
William Barr says there is no evidence of widespread fraud in presidential election
The Justice Department hasn't found evidence to support allegations of widespread fraud that could have changed the result of last month's presidential election, Attorney General William Barr said in an interview with the Associated Press published Tuesday.
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election," Barr said.
Barr, who prior to the election echoed President Donald Trump's claims that mail-in voting wasn't secure, said both the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security have looked into claims of fraud and come up empty.
"There's been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results," Barr said. "And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven't seen anything to substantiate that."
I don't know what to make of this !
I got one friend saying this is proof there was no fraud and another saying this means Barr is from some swamp !
(12-01-2020, 05:09 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, God, Bill Barr is so fired.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/01/politics/...index.html
William Barr says there is no evidence of widespread fraud in presidential election
The Justice Department hasn't found evidence to support allegations of widespread fraud that could have changed the result of last month's presidential election, Attorney General William Barr said in an interview with the Associated Press published Tuesday.
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election," Barr said.
Barr, who prior to the election echoed President Donald Trump's claims that mail-in voting wasn't secure, said both the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security have looked into claims of fraud and come up empty.
"There's been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results," Barr said. "And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven't seen anything to substantiate that."
I'm sure we will get a bunch of posts here from the usual suspects with "alternative facts" to explain Barr's statement.
"But I heard a guy testify in Arizona that he saw a truck with a million ballots pull up and dump them off 5 days after the election!!!"
(12-01-2020, 05:11 PM)BushCheney2000 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2020, 05:09 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, God, Bill Barr is so fired.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/01/politics/...index.html
William Barr says there is no evidence of widespread fraud in presidential election
The Justice Department hasn't found evidence to support allegations of widespread fraud that could have changed the result of last month's presidential election, Attorney General William Barr said in an interview with the Associated Press published Tuesday.
"To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have affected a different outcome in the election," Barr said.
Barr, who prior to the election echoed President Donald Trump's claims that mail-in voting wasn't secure, said both the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security have looked into claims of fraud and come up empty.
"There's been one assertion that would be systemic fraud and that would be the claim that machines were programmed essentially to skew the election results," Barr said. "And the DHS and DOJ have looked into that, and so far, we haven't seen anything to substantiate that."
I don't know what to make of this !
I got one friend saying this is proof there was no fraud and another saying this means Barr is from some swamp !
Explanation: Your first friend is reasonably intelligent; your second, is not.
