Pederson was always on my short list for HC and I'm good with the hire.
Process may have been a bit wacky, but we certainly shouldn't assume everything in the twitter rumor mill is accurate either.
Probably wasn't as wacky as it's being made out to be.
Curious to see what shakes out in the front office. Maybe Pederson has enough of an alpha presence to keep the Baalke influence in check.
(02-06-2022, 11:12 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]Curious to see what shakes out in the front office. Maybe Pederson has enough of an alpha presence to keep the Baalke influence in check.
Yes, it will be very interesting to see what shakes out here. Kahn has a very thin tightrope to navigate. It's obvious that the front office can run better (not to mention the back office, I suspect) but at the same time, the club has been in constant turmoil. If Balke leaves unhappy then the disruption could be really bad but if Balke stays then it's obviously difficult to change and improve. Kahn has to find a way to sideline or improve Balke with Balke's consent. Not easy.
(02-06-2022, 11:12 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]Pederson was always on my short list for HC and I'm good with the hire.
Process may have been a bit wacky, but we certainly shouldn't assume everything in the twitter rumor mill is accurate either.
Probably wasn't as wacky as it's being made out to be.
Curious to see what shakes out in the front office. Maybe Pederson has enough of an alpha presence to keep the Baalke influence in check.
The second he became available last year, he became my top choice. The only guy I would have wanted above him was Payton...and he didn't become available until late.
Like Pederson, he decided to sit out this year...so he became a non factor.
I think the duo of Leftwich and Wilson would have been great. But I am quite happy with how things have turned out.
If I could change a couple of things, Baalke would be gone now, and Pederson would have been hired much sooner.
(02-05-2022, 10:19 AM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]Thanks for sharing that video, Bullseye. Good insight on Pederson's RPO approach.
A lot of what Pederson likes to do with the RPO and inside zone read? That's exactly what Lawrence was running at Clemson. Philosophically they should blend very well together. Etienne should be great in this system. Robinson, when he's healthy? He'll be ready to go. It puts a lot of pressure on Lawrence to read the box correctly, get the count correctly and understand what he's truly seeing out there from a coverage perspective. In the long run it's going to make him a better QB.
I think we're fixing to see a lot of fun and exciting things on offense this year. Really, really excited about who they're going to target next month in March and who they start looking at in the draft. Getting a guy like Ertz or Schultz to combine with Arnold. Getting one of these receivers in the market or bringing back Chark is exciting. You might actually see Shenault thrive in this system once they get it going with the pick plays and RPO screen formations.
A WR now like Dotson, Shakir, Bolden and Philips in the draft start to climb up on your draft board a little bit more in this type of system. A TE like McBride, Kolar and Likely start to look more and more intriguing to add into the mix. You really want an Ertz / Goedert situation here now with this offense.
Agreed completely.
Pederson has effectively combined traditional WCO principles and more modern RPO principles that will serve many on our team well. As you pointed out, TL ran a lot of RPO in college, and being trained in WCO principles will help him a good deal, too, especially when it comes to footwork and short accuracy.
I also believe Pederson will maximize Etienne's production, assuming Etienne is fully recovered from his injury. Etienne had value to TL as much as a receiver as a runner. Pederson utilizes receiving backs well. darren Sproles had 52 catches under Pederson in 2016. A healthy Etienne possesses some of the same skill sets as Sproles in the passing game.
A key will be whether DH Chark can be re-signed. Chark had his best year under a WCO type scheme under Jay Gruden. I think Chark at his best is better than a Nelson Agholor, who was productive under Pederson.
As for prospects in this draft, I have long been a fan of Dotson, but I am unsure if he'll be a target for us. I like what I've seen of Shakir, but want to see more. I am excited to see a credible TE or two finally added to the offense, and this draft seems loaded with good prospects at the position.
I wish we could snag Chris Olave in the draft somehow. I remember him making about every play while I was watching Justin Fields tape prior to us having the first pick last year. Dudes a stud.
(02-06-2022, 08:01 PM)ChrisJagBoy Wrote: [ -> ]I wish we could snag Chris Olave in the draft somehow. I remember him making about every play while I was watching Justin Fields tape prior to us having the first pick last year. Dudes a stud.
Agreed. A lot of crazy things would have to fall into place for him to fall to #33 though.
I gotts say, i was really impressed seeing so many players coming in to meet Pederson. He said from speaking to the players they want to win and he is saying all the right things about developing players and units. I think we have a good core of guys that we can build around and help get so much better like Lawrence and Josh Allen. Its got to be hard playing for us the last 2 seasons with the scores and all the drama and not think there are 31 other teams out there (well maybe 30, theres also the Jets).
I know Baalke is still here and it sucks but hopefully he listens to Pederson and if theres someone that Pederson wants, hopefully Khan goes for that over Baalke's guy.
The only weird thing is when i keep hearing the name Doug my brain keeps thinking 'oh no, Marrone's back'
Former Steelers' DB and current ESPN analyst Ryan Clark, former Jets GM and current ESPN analyst Mike Tannenbaum, and former Patriots' LB Rob Ninkovich discuss the Pederson hiring and the development of QB Trevor Lawrence.
Quick version: All applaud the hiring.
https://youtu.be/uo5Rozm7vn0
(02-04-2022, 07:31 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote: [ -> ] (02-04-2022, 07:26 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]Ignore the silly defense of the worst oline coach of our generation, and it looks like we have found our oline coach:
EDIT: Someone in the comments is saying the Bills are getting him instead so who knows.
https://twitter.com/grantcohn/status/148...9619941378
What I hate about that whole take is making Race the feature of the article.
Why do we have to say "black coach" It isn't like we call every white coach "white coach"
Judge a man on his merits and accomplishments not the color of his skin. I hate this whole new age pc/cancel culture who like to label everything.
you hate cancel culture and block everyone who disagrees with you? Interesting.
Considering the Flores suit is front and center at the NFL's focus right now, I would say that this cycle especially does bring the race equation into the discussion, whether it has legs or not. Probably won't be able to discuss this much further without risking politics, so I'm gonna leave it at that.
(02-06-2022, 10:14 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]When applying national percentages of African Americans in this country (12.4%) to the number of head coaching positions there would be three or four Black coaches. Right now there is one. The ratio is off for sure.
"In 2020, the Black or African American alone population (41.1 million) accounted for 12.4% of all people living in the United States, compared with 38.9 million and 12.6% in 2010."
On the other hand, if the same standards were to be applied to players then the obvious gripe would be on the white mans side.
"White players make up only 24.9 percent of the NFL, compared with 57.5 percent of players who identify as Black or African American."
(02-06-2022, 10:12 AM)Newton Wrote: [ -> ]Is this still a thread about our team?
Not in the slightest, other than the fact we hired a white coach I guess. Khan must be racist I tell ya.
I've been saying this about marketing in general for a while now, with regards to the increase in black presence in new commercial advertising, TV shows, etc. Not that this is a bad thing because it helps develop new sales markets, and also helps companies ward off accusations of institutionalized racism, but at some point a saturation point has to be reached and you might see this trend fade a bit. Long term, its not the greatest business model to aim 75-80% of your advertising at 13% of your market. And the NFL is kind of a microcosm of this; large % of participants are black, but the large % of the consumer is white. So there's a tension there, and it's a balancing act that will be a challenge for the NFL. From the fans perspective, we just want positive results, regardless of the race of the coach/players. As i think most companies do. It would be interesting to see how other professions are broken down by race, vis a vis manager and labor. My own profession is an example. A large amount of the talent pool in IT is Indian, yet very few projects are headed up by an Indian manager. Is this bias? Not sure. Does it affect overall product? Doesnt seem to. Maybe a bad example, but its the one closest to me. Others will have thier own.
So, it's disgusting that this team is dropping Warhop. However, Warhop seems to have no problems getting work in the NFL.
Biggest take away from that is. Why are we one of the few teams that has a black offensive line coach to begin with?
He's been an offensive line coach in the NFL since 1996. He's been at a lot of different places. I doubt he'll have any issues getting another gig. Bills and Giants have openings.
Also. Who's to say Doug doesn't already have a guy in mind who also just so happens to be black?
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
Plus, Warhop has been here a while. The O-line has been nothing to write home about. I couldn't care less what his ethnicity is. I just want a good one.
Yeah our line hasn't been great. I don't mind trying someone new.
I must be living in an alternate reality. Just last year Urban Meyer retain Warhop and this whole board was up in arms. “PFF says we have the 2 worst tackles in the league” and “we have one of the worst lines” and “why can’t we ever clean house” and now we all want to keep him? Just a year later it’s insane that he’s not coming back? Man.
(02-07-2022, 11:23 AM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]So, it's disgusting that this team is dropping Warhop. However, Warhop seems to have no problems getting work in the NFL.
Biggest take away from that is. Why are we one of the few teams that has a black offensive line coach to begin with?
He's been an offensive line coach in the NFL since 1996. He's been at a lot of different places. I doubt he'll have any issues getting another gig. Bills and Giants have openings.
Also. Who's to say Doug doesn't already have a guy in mind who also just so happens to be black?
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
(Emphasis added)
[BLEEP]?!?
(02-08-2022, 04:00 AM)Black and Teal Wrote: [ -> ]I must be living in an alternate reality. Just last year Urban Meyer retain Warhop and this whole board was up in arms. “PFF says we have the 2 worst tackles in the league” and “we have one of the worst lines” and “why can’t we ever clean house” and now we all want to keep him? Just a year later it’s insane that he’s not coming back? Man.
Haha. Welcome to the waffle house.
(02-08-2022, 04:00 AM)Black and Teal Wrote: [ -> ]I must be living in an alternate reality. Just last year Urban Meyer retain Warhop and this whole board was up in arms. “PFF says we have the 2 worst tackles in the league” and “we have one of the worst lines” and “why can’t we ever clean house” and now we all want to keep him? Just a year later it’s insane that he’s not coming back? Man.
One dip [BLEEP] on the web says it's disgusting that we're firing Warhop and that means "We all want to keep him"??!!?
C'mon Man!
Nobody that I know, wants to keep Warhop. He sucks! I don't care what color a coach is, black, white, red, yellow, brown, green or plaid, a bad coach is a bad coach and he needs to go.
(02-08-2022, 10:43 AM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: [ -> ]Nobody that I know, wants to keep Warhop. He sucks! I don't care what color a coach is, black, white, red, yellow, brown, green or plaid, a bad coach is a bad coach and he needs to go.
Doug is the head coach and will choose his own coaching staff. I am pretty sure he will not care about anything but the coach doing a good job. People that don't manage that way rarely succeed for long. Like I said this will be some good entertainment while we wait for the draft.