Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Ridley Speculated to Hit Free Agency
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Could be we offered both guys very nice contracts and neither signed because nothing compelled them to sign at this particular time with free agency days away.  Deadlines compel people to sign.  I get it. It has to be Baalke’s fault because we’re in full on fan the flames mode.

From Ridley’s point of view, there was no deadline. It was either sign something without seeing the market or test the market and have multiple teams bid up your price, then sign. Color me shocked he chose the latter.

From Allen’s point of view, there also was no deadline unless helping the team tag Ridley was a concern of his.  Color me shocked it wasn’t.  It was either sign without seeing the market and help the team or wait and see what the market is for pass rushers that are actually hitting the market and then use the quite often overpays of free agency to argue for a better deal with the Jags.

There’s no reason to get upset here.  Players will almost always take the path that helps their argument in contract negotiations as they are being advised to do.  Just imagine being one of them and getting a top of market offer by the Jags days before free agency.  Wouldn’t the thought process be “well if they’re willing to give me top of market money to not see free agency, what’s really behind the curtain for me?”  I feel like you’d have to offer way over top of market to get a signature from guys who are expected to see top of market bids in free agency or be dealing with a guy like Mike Evans who played his whole career with your team and negotiating what is likely his last meaningful contract and him likely preferring to retire on the team he was drafted by.
(03-05-2024, 06:01 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-05-2024, 04:25 PM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]We're not far away, but, we're not close neither. We're in that weird limbo phase, where it's purgatory in the off season. I said it a few times already in various threads, not shy or bashful by any means, I know it's overreaction here and there. 

Am I bummed that they couldn't get an extension done with Josh Allen? Yes.

Am I bummed that it's possible that Calvin Ridley can leave for another team, potentially a direct AFC competitor that comes back to bite us down the road? Yes. 

Do I think we should abandon all hope, sell our stocks and get out of the market of being a Jaguars fan for good? No. Of course not. Been through it all since I was seven years old. The good, the bad and the ugly. 

It does feel like though, that, this was one of the more important off seasons this franchise has had in ages. It feels a little underwhelming. It also hasn't officially kicked off yet. As the market and new calendar year officially starts next Wednesday. 

Here's how I see it, as it stands today. 

We're in the market for a CB2, a DT/NT and a WR1 at the minimum. Can they sign all of these needs in free agency? Yes. Will they? I don't know. We'll [BLEEP] around and find out I guess. 

What else does the team need? C, LG and maybe a RG for sure. If you're factoring in last year's draft class? Baalke is potentially operating, along with Pederson's blessing, that, some of these needs are already filled on the roster. 

I believe Antonio Johnson is for sure a starter in this secondary next year. Whether that's at safety in Jenkins old role or playing a little bit of his role and the nickel CB role? We'll see. 

I believe there's some good developmental prospects on this roster as well from last year and the year prior. I like Buster Brown. I like Braswell out of Rutgers. They may or may not bring back Chris Herndon as well. Is he a world beater? No. Is he serviceable? Certainly. 

Once they start signing players next week though it'll help most of us guesstimate what they're planning on doing in the draft. I expect maybe ONE really good signing in the trenches on either side of the football and then maybe two to three "B" grade type signings as insurance policies. 

It at least allows you to breath a little bit in the draft.

Yea, we are currently kind of stuck in the mid level purgatory. We were last year but 3 remarkable plays allowing us to make the playoffs disguised that. This year's free agency and draft is pretty important. It has to allow us to take the next step.  I agree we are in the market for a CB (slot), DT (extra large please) and a WR.  I would add we need two guards and a center. It is imperative we revamp the interior of our offensive line. This includes many of our interior line backups. Our line has under performed for more than a few seasons with the mostly same cast of players there. Doing that yet again next season would be some form of insanity. It is time to cut many of those guys loose and move on giving others a chance.  At least we would have new guys to be disappointed in.

We were very lucky and fortunate in some cases back in 2022. It came all the way down to week 17 and a score on defense to seal that divisional title and home play-off appearance as the 4th seed in the AFC. 

I think we're all in agreement, locally, and in some cases, nationally, that, this team must improve it's line play across the board. Especially within the interior. 

Hopefully clearing up this much cap space with more potential cuts looming, that, they can at least achieve some competent touch-up's in the market. I think a lot of this is hinging on how this front office drafted in 2023 with those thirteen or fourteen selections.

Granted, they only invested a 1st and 7th RD pick on the offensive line last year. So, it'll be interesting to see the approach in April. The promising part was that they reportedly interviewed 12 offensive lineman. That would indicate to me that they're looking at this correctly and expecting multiple opportunities on every day of the draft to add a player or two. 

(03-06-2024, 07:57 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]How long does it take to knock the rust off a period of inactivity? I keep seeing references to Ridley’s time out of the league as an excuse. I’m not knocking the people who are saying it, I’m just genuinely curious about how long it takes to be proficient after one entire offseason and season to get back into game mode. It’s not like he’s learning something for the first time.

I don't think it's a big excuse, but, being out of football for two years would impact any athlete. Being out of work period, for most people, would require some rust to come off. It's not just the physical aspect of it as well, it's the mental aspect of it, it's the moving your family aspect, getting to know a new location, system, players, people, etc. aspect. 

At any rate. I don't think it matters. I am pretty sure he'll bolt for the highest bidder or take an opportunity on a 1 - 2 year rental on a more competent and competitive football team. We'll [BLEEP] around and find out more than likely, FAFO, as the kid's say. Would I care if he signed up on a team like the Panthers or Giants?

Nope. Not really. BUT... if he signs up on a team like the Chiefs, Bengals or Ravens? It's going to sting twice more than likely. Sting seeing him hit those 70+, 1200+, 10+ marks and sting again when he's lining up against somebody in our secondary in a meaningful play-off game.

(03-06-2024, 08:51 AM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: [ -> ]Could be we offered both guys very nice contracts and neither signed because nothing compelled them to sign at this particular time with free agency days away.  Deadlines compel people to sign.  I get it. It has to be Baalke’s fault because we’re in full on fan the flames mode.

From Ridley’s point of view, there was no deadline. It was either sign something without seeing the market or test the market and have multiple teams bid up your price, then sign. Color me shocked he chose the latter.

From Allen’s point of view, there also was no deadline unless helping the team tag Ridley was a concern of his.  Color me shocked it wasn’t.  It was either sign without seeing the market and help the team or wait and see what the market is for pass rushers that are actually hitting the market and then use the quite often overpays of free agency to argue for a better deal with the Jags.

There’s no reason to get upset here.  Players will almost always take the path that helps their argument in contract negotiations as they are being advised to do.  Just imagine being one of them and getting a top of market offer by the Jags days before free agency.  Wouldn’t the thought process be “well if they’re willing to give me top of market money to not see free agency, what’s really behind the curtain for me?”  I feel like you’d have to offer way over top of market to get a signature from guys who are expected to see top of market bids in free agency or be dealing with a guy like Mike Evans who played his whole career with your team and negotiating what is likely his last meaningful contract and him likely preferring to retire on the team he was drafted by.

It's a big game of chicken with a lot of money and pride involved for the general manager, the player and the player's agent. That's all it comes down to. 

You have two players essentially highlighting the very top of the market at their respective positions now. They're waiting on everybody else to circle their wagons and play catch-up with their deals.

Bottomline. Allen's getting paid a King's Ransom to stay in Jacksonville at some point between now and July. Ridley's fixing to set the market for his position on either a 1 - 2 year deal for a competitive team or he'll take the 3 - 4 year deal that ensures himself and his family are set as he approaches the age of 30 in the NFL.
(03-06-2024, 07:12 AM)Hurricane Wrote: [ -> ]I just can't fathom giving up a 3rd round pick for a guy for one year. He didn't have the best of year, but he had a way better year than the majority of our WR's from the past. In my eyes, the only way giving up a 3rd and walking away from the player after year one, is he was just bad and didn't produce. In this case, he did produce. Yes he had some drops, ran some wrong routes. But we are talking about a guy that has been out of football for a few years.

I'm not clamoring he needs a big contract, but the franchise tag is perfect for him. Gives him another year to prove what he can do.

Instead we give it to Allen, someone who has proved he can play the part.

This is what good teams do. They move on from guys before they overpay.

What can we do with 15-20M if we move on? We saw what happened when we had him and no help up front.

Nobody is saying he isn't good, or that we'll miss his production. But if we have to gut the roster even more just to keep him around, is it really worth it?

(03-06-2024, 07:57 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]How long does it take to knock the rust off a period of inactivity? I keep seeing references to Ridley’s time out of the league as an excuse. I’m not knocking the people who are saying it, I’m just genuinely curious about how long it takes to be proficient after one entire offseason and season to get back into game mode. It’s not like he’s learning something for the first time.

I saw rust maybe a few weeks into the season. The rest of the way, it was just we were incapable of running a realistic offense because our line was abhorrent.
(03-06-2024, 09:09 AM)Mikey Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-06-2024, 07:12 AM)Hurricane Wrote: [ -> ]I just can't fathom giving up a 3rd round pick for a guy for one year. He didn't have the best of year, but he had a way better year than the majority of our WR's from the past. In my eyes, the only way giving up a 3rd and walking away from the player after year one, is he was just bad and didn't produce. In this case, he did produce. Yes he had some drops, ran some wrong routes. But we are talking about a guy that has been out of football for a few years.

I'm not clamoring he needs a big contract, but the franchise tag is perfect for him. Gives him another year to prove what he can do.

Instead we give it to Allen, someone who has proved he can play the part.

This is what good teams do. They move on from guys before they overpay.

What can we do with 15-20M if we move on? We saw what happened when we had him and no help up front.

Nobody is saying he isn't good, or that we'll miss his production. But if we have to gut the roster even more just to keep him around, is it really worth it?

(03-06-2024, 07:57 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]How long does it take to knock the rust off a period of inactivity? I keep seeing references to Ridley’s time out of the league as an excuse. I’m not knocking the people who are saying it, I’m just genuinely curious about how long it takes to be proficient after one entire offseason and season to get back into game mode. It’s not like he’s learning something for the first time.

I saw rust maybe a few weeks into the season. The rest of the way, it was just we were incapable of running a realistic offense because our line was abhorrent.

We're not a good team. Not implying you're saying we're a good team, but, this team has a lot of work to do in a short amount of time this off season to get itself out of the middle of the road teams. Good teams don't start off 8 - 3 and then proceed to collapse and finish 9 - 8. 

I think people are concerned about having cap space for a front office that has shown for the past three years that they're hit or miss with finding adequate talent, upgrades and we're now entering year three of complaining about the same three issues again.

1. No interior presence on defense. 
2. No interior presence or push on offense. 
3. No "Alpha" or "X" type receiver on the outside for this offense. 

Also, need to put definitions or parameters around the term "gutting" when it comes to this roster. They're hovering around $50M in cap space, they could maybe make the next most logical choice, and that's outright cut Cam Robinson to come up with the $17.5M to maybe fork over towards Ridley, but, due to said incompetence above? We don't have a reliable or confident answer for Cam Robinson.

Because, if it was Walker Little? Cam's sorry, overpaid [BLEEP] is already off the roster by now, so, there's that. I think what bothers most of us, like Hurricane is stating, is that, we essentially pissed away a 3rd RD pick on a team that we're currently seeing a little bit of "gutting" to make room for massive contract's that are due more than likely at the end of this year, going into 2025, etc. 

The needle isn't moving enough in the right direction, we're right there in the middle, and with this many holes and concerns, again, THE SAME HOLES AND CONCERNS we've been griping about for now three years in a row? This team feels like it's just a really good, smelly, strong Mayport gust of wind from falling down to being a 6 - 11 team or worse. 

I know, I know, "But..but..but..Caldrac...C'mon man.... it's not NEARLY as bad as it was X amount of years ago". Yes, you're right. I agree. But, it's damn near close to being a brief fart in the wind with blundered opportunities. We're not capitalizing enough. Otherwise we're not having this conversation or debate now. 

Cheers though!
Amp Wigg hit it on the head yesterday.

So many resources thrown at the Oline... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at CB.... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at the DLline.... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at WR... Still a massive need.

Baalke is being saved by Trevor and Doug Pederson.
I don't see how Baalke is being saved by Trevor and Doug because neither one of them were good last year either.
(03-06-2024, 10:00 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Amp Wigg hit it on the head yesterday.

So many resources thrown at the Oline... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at CB.... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at the DLline.... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at WR... Still a massive need.

Baalke is being saved by Trevor and Doug Pederson.

We're an average team.  We have an average set of needs. 

But remember, just 2 years ago, we were the worst team in the league.  We've come a long way.  Last year we took a step back.  But nothing moves in a straight line in sports.  Things go up and down.  You just have to hope we can start trending upward again.  

That's how I feel about it.
(03-06-2024, 10:10 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-06-2024, 10:00 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Amp Wigg hit it on the head yesterday.

So many resources thrown at the Oline... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at CB.... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at the DLline.... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at WR... Still a massive need.

Baalke is being saved by Trevor and Doug Pederson.

We're an average team.  We have an average set of needs. 

But remember, just 2 years ago, we were the worst team in the league.  We've come a long way.  Last year we took a step back.  But nothing moves in a straight line in sports.  Things go up and down.  You just have to hope we can start trending upward again.  

That's how I feel about it.

Hard to feel hopeful when it's the same people in charge that are responsible for this team still being average and having the same average set of needs for the third straight year in a row. 

I agree, yes, the moral victory stance, the participation trophy crowd, we've come a long way, etc. However, it's just a shot away from being obscure again. 

You're philosophical, so, I'll leave a great scene for you to meditate on. Cheers to hope! 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHwckk01AAU
(03-06-2024, 10:10 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-06-2024, 10:00 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Amp Wigg hit it on the head yesterday.

So many resources thrown at the Oline... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at CB.... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at the DLline.... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at WR... Still a massive need.

Baalke is being saved by Trevor and Doug Pederson.

We're an average team.  We have an average set of needs. 

But remember, just 2 years ago, we were the worst team in the league.  We've come a long way.  Last year we took a step back.  But nothing moves in a straight line in sports.  Things go up and down.  You just have to hope we can start trending upward again.  

That's how I feel about it.
Trevor and Doug covered up so many issues with this team. Without them, this roster is a 4-5 win team. And I know the next part will be "Well anytime you lose your starting QB...." . I get that. I just don't see a progression in the roster with draft picks since Baalke has been here. Trevor, Anton, Travon.... Those are the only 3 true building blocks he has brought to this team through the draft. You can't win a SB like that.

I understand it's better than it was 2 years ago. I think everyone can see that but I think that has more to do with Trevor and Doug than the overall roster.
(03-06-2024, 10:40 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-06-2024, 10:10 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]We're an average team.  We have an average set of needs. 

But remember, just 2 years ago, we were the worst team in the league.  We've come a long way.  Last year we took a step back.  But nothing moves in a straight line in sports.  Things go up and down.  You just have to hope we can start trending upward again.  

That's how I feel about it.
Trevor and Doug covered up so many issues with this team. Without them, this roster is a 4-5 win team. And I know the next part will be "Well anytime you lose your starting QB...." . I get that. I just don't see a progression in the roster with draft picks since Baalke has been here. Trevor, Anton, Travon.... Those are the only 3 true building blocks he has brought to this team through the draft. You can't win a SB like that.

I understand it's better than it was 2 years ago. I think everyone can see that but I think that has more to do with Trevor and Doug than the overall roster.

I've been a die-hard fan since 1993, the day the Jaguars were born.   I've seen it all.  I guess I just don't get all heated up about it like you guys do.  It's not worth it.  Whatever happens will happen.   Besides, 9-8 is a lot better than we've seen around here in a long time.
(03-06-2024, 11:13 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-06-2024, 10:40 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Trevor and Doug covered up so many issues with this team. Without them, this roster is a 4-5 win team. And I know the next part will be "Well anytime you lose your starting QB...." . I get that. I just don't see a progression in the roster with draft picks since Baalke has been here. Trevor, Anton, Travon.... Those are the only 3 true building blocks he has brought to this team through the draft. You can't win a SB like that.

I understand it's better than it was 2 years ago. I think everyone can see that but I think that has more to do with Trevor and Doug than the overall roster.

I've been a die-hard fan since 1993, the day the Jaguars were born.   I've seen it all.  I guess I just don't get all heated up about it like you guys do.  It's not worth it.  Whatever happens will happen.   Besides, 9-8 is a lot better than we've seen around here in a long time.
I'm not heated by any means. I'm not over here losing sleep over the Jags lol

It's merely an observation about the current and future state of this franchise. I see a GM who is missing with draft picks, trying to cover those mistakes up with free agents and then repeating this cycle.
(03-06-2024, 11:21 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-06-2024, 11:13 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]I've been a die-hard fan since 1993, the day the Jaguars were born.   I've seen it all.  I guess I just don't get all heated up about it like you guys do.  It's not worth it.  Whatever happens will happen.   Besides, 9-8 is a lot better than we've seen around here in a long time.
I'm not heated by any means. I'm not over here losing sleep over the Jags lol

It's merely an observation about the current and future state of this franchise. I see a GM who is missing with draft picks, trying to cover those mistakes up with free agents and then repeating this cycle.

Exactly. I find it laughable, when, fans of a football team spend time, DAILY, on a message board, DEDICATED to predominately talking about their favorite team. Especially the long timers, first day fans, etc. 

Whether you're cooler than Joe Cool from the 10 yard line with the game on the line or laidback like Blake Bortles. Whether you get heated up and punt your neighbor's cat out of your front yard or throw a chair across the living room like Bobby Knight, etc. 

You're on here because you have some level or degree of love or admiration for this team. No reason to knock each other or get into a pissing contest over who fans the most or fans the best. 

You're still a fan.
Something I read on PFT caught my eye regarding Ridley...that I don't think has been settled on this board yet.  It states "Tagging Allen means that the Jaguars won’t be using a franchise or transition tag on wide receiver Calvin Ridley. If he re-signs with the team, they will send a second-round pick to the Falcons to complete their trade for the wideout. If he doesn’t return, it will be a third-round selection."

I think the general consensus was that if Ridley hits the FA market, then resigned that the traded pick would still be a 3.  However the above statement, indicates that no matter when Ridley resigns with the Jaguars that the traded pick would be a 2.

Now I don't know if the above statement is accurate--or it's missing language--but assuming it's true it would certainly add to the "cost" of signing Ridley in FA.  It makes sense that the trade clause couldn't be so easily reduced by having Ridley not sign his agreed upon contract until the first day of FA.  On the other hand, what if he doesn't sign until after the actual draft?

PFT Article

Just wondering if someone had evidence of something more definitive.
(03-06-2024, 11:38 AM)cland Wrote: [ -> ]Something I read on PFT caught my eye regarding Ridley...that I don't think has been settled on this board yet.  It states "Tagging Allen means that the Jaguars won’t be using a franchise or transition tag on wide receiver Calvin Ridley. If he re-signs with the team, they will send a second-round pick to the Falcons to complete their trade for the wideout. If he doesn’t return, it will be a third-round selection."

I think the general consensus was that if Ridley hits the FA market, then resigned that the traded pick would still be a 3.  However the above statement, indicates that no matter when Ridley resigns with the Jaguars that the traded pick would be a 2.

Now I don't know if the above statement is accurate--or it's missing language--but assuming it's true it would certainly add to the "cost" of signing Ridley in FA.  It makes sense that the trade clause couldn't be so easily reduced by having Ridley not sign his agreed upon contract until the first day of FA.  On the other hand, what if he doesn't sign until after the actual draft?

PFT Article

Just wondering if someone had evidence of something more definitive.

Pretty sure it's missing language.  Almost everywhere else it's reported that it has to be an "in season" extension meaning during the 2023 league year which would make way more sense than the article you copied insinuates..  Free agency that starts up next week is for the 2024 league year.
How to solve a problem like Ridley?

He must be one of the most divisive players we've had. Not in a negative way but is he worth the pick/money. I think we all thought he was a good addition when we traded for him and would be another weapon in the WR room.

He's had his good moments and he's has his bad moments. If you were to just look at stats he had over 1k yds receiving and 8 TD's but if you watched the games you know those stats are misleading. He had drops, ran wrong routes, miscommunication with Trevor, games where he struggled fitness wise.

I had no idea what we were going to do with him but now we've let him walk and I don't see him coming back as a cap space heavy team will pay him better than we will. I did wonder how much of last year was kicking off the rust and getting back into football shape. Is next season the year he takes another step forward? Are we watching his decline start? 

Just find him such an enigma. And if he goes somewhere else and has a great year next season....oh Baalke your going to get blamed for that (not by me but definitely some people)
I think Kirk and Zay going down hurt Ridley in that it makes it seem like his number were more to do with picking up slack than making a difference. If Ridley had put up the numbers he did with Kirk and Zay in the line up the whole year then there would be no question about resigning him.
(03-06-2024, 02:06 PM)Protozoa Wrote: [ -> ]I think Kirk and Zay going down hurt Ridley in that it makes it seem like his number were more to do with picking up slack than making a difference. If Ridley had put up the numbers he did with Kirk and Zay in the line up the whole year then there would be no question about resigning him.

This makes no sense to me. By default, he was considered the WR1 all year. Zay was in and out of the line-up routinely last year. Kirk went down and missed the last five games on the year. 

If anything, it allowed Lawrence to target Ridley more, for this offensive coaching staff to utilize him a little more. The fact that he put up the numbers he did IN SPITE of everybody being in and out of the line-up around him is probably the best case you could have made for him to be brought back. 

Kirk's serviceable. He's a slot receiver. He's not a true #1. 
Jones' is questionable now. He got arrested last year for a baby mama dispute. Then he misses half a season worth of football games.

This is further compounded with the obvious issues in the starting line-up with the offensive line, no running game at all and Lawrence physically falling apart towards the end of the year. 

Ridley did a number of things in 2023 that I simply do not see in Kirk's and Zay's game. His route running is superb, his ability to catch rifles are impressive, sure, he had his concentration drops and we wanted to kill him, but, hate to break it to you, so did the rest of this receiving core all year and they only finished 15th in dropped passes as a team.

Not nearly as bad as it was the year prior I believe.
(03-06-2024, 10:10 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-06-2024, 10:00 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: [ -> ]Amp Wigg hit it on the head yesterday.

So many resources thrown at the Oline... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at CB.... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at the DLline.... Still a massive need.
So many resources thrown at WR... Still a massive need.

Baalke is being saved by Trevor and Doug Pederson.

We're an average team.  We have an average set of needs. 

But remember, just 2 years ago, we were the worst team in the league.  We've come a long way.  Last year we took a step back.  But nothing moves in a straight line in sports.  Things go up and down.  You just have to hope we can start trending upward again.  

That's how I feel about it.

Oh well since we're not the worst team in the NFL I guess we're doing fine.

With the resources available, the Jaguars at this point should be in the playoffs perennially.  Instead, we just got passed up by a rookie QB and a rookie HC who hypothetically should have a far less talented roster.
(03-06-2024, 12:03 PM)JagFan81 Wrote: [ -> ]How to solve a problem like Ridley?

He must be one of the most divisive players we've had. Not in a negative way but is he worth the pick/money. I think we all thought he was a good addition when we traded for him and would be another weapon in the WR room.

I understand what you are stating, however, I don't think it should be viewed as divisive.  The fact that Ridley was acquired and performed to the level that he can now command a $20/year million salary shows that it was indeed a good trade.  As such, when you have good players, tough decisions need to be made.   We've always had easy decisions of letting players leave because our drafts were pretty much horrendous from 2007 through 2018ish. 

I think the Jags would be looking at this totally differently if we didn't give up 150+ yards to Derrick Henry and lose to the Titans in the final week.  It could have been the Jags once again winning in the 1st rounds of the playoffs against the Browns and advancing to the divisional round vs the Ravens.    That said, other position weaknesses on the Jags was totally exposed so now they're left to question how to better spend their $$$ as there are glaring needs on both sides of the line and in the secondary.
(03-06-2024, 02:35 PM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-06-2024, 02:06 PM)Protozoa Wrote: [ -> ]I think Kirk and Zay going down hurt Ridley in that it makes it seem like his number were more to do with picking up slack than making a difference. If Ridley had put up the numbers he did with Kirk and Zay in the line up the whole year then there would be no question about resigning him.

This makes no sense to me. By default, he was considered the WR1 all year. Zay was in and out of the line-up routinely last year. Kirk went down and missed the last five games on the year. 

If anything, it allowed Lawrence to target Ridley more, for this offensive coaching staff to utilize him a little more. The fact that he put up the numbers he did IN SPITE of everybody being in and out of the line-up around him is probably the best case you could have made for him to be brought back. 

Kirk's serviceable. He's a slot receiver. He's not a true #1. 
Jones' is questionable now. He got arrested last year for a baby mama dispute. Then he misses half a season worth of football games.

This is further compounded with the obvious issues in the starting line-up with the offensive line, no running game at all and Lawrence physically falling apart towards the end of the year. 

Ridley did a number of things in 2023 that I simply do not see in Kirk's and Zay's game. His route running is superb, his ability to catch rifles are impressive, sure, he had his concentration drops and we wanted to kill him, but, hate to break it to you, so did the rest of this receiving core all year and they only finished 15th in dropped passes as a team.

Not nearly as bad as it was the year prior I believe.

That's my point he was forced to be more of the focal point. If Kirk and Zay played the whole year does Ridley still have 1000 yards and 8 touchdowns (the same numbers Kirk put up the year before btw). I don't feel Ridley makes it over 1000 yards if Kirk plays those last five.

I respect your opinion and understand what you'resaying. but 20 mil and a 2nd for Ridley who cost us multiple games with his drops and inconsistencies understanding the play book and what route he was running. Yes the line was bad but the line didn't cause the above that's on him.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24