03-04-2017, 05:41 PM
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
03-04-2017, 05:47 PM
TE 40-times...
- Evan Engram - 4.42
- OJ Howard - 4.51
- George Kittle - 4.52 <--might shoot him to 5th round
- Darrelle Daniels - 4.55
- Bucky Hodges - 4.57
- Gerald Everett - 4.62
- Jonnu Smith - 4.62
- David Njoku - 4.64
- Cethan Carter - 4.68
- Jeremy Sprinkle - 4.69 <--worth considering in round 4
- Billy Brown - 4.70 <--listed as a WR
- Adam Shaheen - 4.79
- Scott Orndoff - 4.84
- Michael Roberts - 4.86 <--slow 40 could drop him to round 6
- Hayden Plinke - 4.97
03-04-2017, 05:49 PM
Quote:4.79 at 6'6 279 is actually really impressive.
Where can I find their actual weigh-in numbers down to the fraction of an inch?
03-04-2017, 05:50 PM
Quote:Where can I find their actual weigh-in numbers down to the fraction of an inch?
Not sure. NFL.com maybe ? Google ?
03-04-2017, 05:53 PM
Quote:Where can I find their actual weigh-in numbers down to the fraction of an inch?http://www.nfl.com/combine/participants
03-04-2017, 05:53 PM
Quote:TE 40-times...
<ul class="bbcol decimal">[*]Evan Engram - 4.42
[*]OJ Howard - 4.51
[*]George Kittle - 4.52 <--might shoot him to 5th round
[*]Darrelle Daniels - 4.55
[*]Bucky Hodges - 4.57
[*]Gerald Everett - 4.62
[*]Jonnu Smith - 4.62
[*]David Njoku - 4.64
[*]Cethan Carter - 4.68
[*]Jeremy Sprinkle - 4.69 <--worth considering in round 4
[*]Billy Brown - 4.70 <--listed as a WR
[*]Adam Shaheen - 4.79
[*]Scott Orndoff - 4.84
[*]Michael Roberts - 4.86 <--slow 40 could drop him to round 6
[*]Hayden Plinke - 4.97
</ul>
As far as Roberts he wasn't expected to run that fast a 4.8 is in his wheelhouse.i doubt it'll effect his stock much
03-04-2017, 05:55 PM
Quote:Does people still want Allen at 4 with his arthritis?No way at 4. I think he slides a little now. The arthritis might not effect him much right away but in 3-4 years it could really take away from his game.
Right now Jamal Adams is the best player in the draft to me.
I want him at 4 if we wind up staying there.
After Adams I would say Garrett if he's there has to be in play, Solomon Thomas,Leonard fournette, and maybe lattimore would be my top 5 as of now.
The only real change was lattimore replacing Allen.
03-04-2017, 06:02 PM
Quote:Not sure. NFL.com maybe ? Google ?
draftscout.com usually posts them, but I don't see them immediately updating their numbers with combine results.
03-04-2017, 06:05 PM
Quote:draftscout.com usually posts them, but I don't see them immediately updating their numbers with combine results.http://www.nfl.com/combine/participants
03-04-2017, 06:06 PM
Quote:As far as Roberts he wasn't expected to run that fast a 4.8 is in his wheelhouse.i doubt it'll effect his stock much
True... I had him as good value in round five with similar speed. The thing is, I wasn't expecting so many TEs to do so good wherein you might see guys slipping in front of him and pushing him down.
03-04-2017, 06:12 PM
Quote:http://www.nfl.com/combine/participants
But they don't give heights down to the fraction of an inch like they should. I want to know if Shaheen is 6' 5 1/2" or is he 6' 6 1/4".
03-04-2017, 06:12 PM
<a class="" href='https://twitter.com/GrahamBarfield'>Graham Barfield<span> </span>@GrahamBarfield </a> <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/GrahamBarfield/status/837733393664200705' title="10:36 AM - 3 Mar 2017">Mar 3</a>
<div>
<div>
<div>More
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="" style="color:rgb(41,47,51);font-family:Arial, sans-serif;background-color:rgb(245,248,250);font-size:1px;">Graham Barfield Retweeted Josh Norris
<p class="" style="font-size:26px;">Cook's weight adjusted speed percentile score: 64th Fournette's weight adjusted speed percentile score: 94th
<div>
<div>
<div>More
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="" style="color:rgb(41,47,51);font-family:Arial, sans-serif;background-color:rgb(245,248,250);font-size:1px;">Graham Barfield Retweeted Josh Norris
<p class="" style="font-size:26px;">Cook's weight adjusted speed percentile score: 64th Fournette's weight adjusted speed percentile score: 94th
03-04-2017, 06:13 PM
<a class="" href='https://twitter.com/GrahamBarfield'>Graham Barfield<span> </span>@GrahamBarfield </a> <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/GrahamBarfield/status/837740244757786624' title="11:03 AM - 3 Mar 2017">Mar 3</a>
<div>
<div>
<div>More
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="" style="color:rgb(41,47,51);font-family:Arial, sans-serif;background-color:rgb(245,248,250);font-size:1px;">Graham Barfield Retweeted Graham Barfield
<p class="" style="font-size:26px;">Fournette has 94th percentile weight-adjusted speed. 2nd-best speed score for any RB weighing 235+ in last 10 years.
<div>
<div>
<div>More
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="" style="color:rgb(41,47,51);font-family:Arial, sans-serif;background-color:rgb(245,248,250);font-size:1px;">Graham Barfield Retweeted Graham Barfield
<p class="" style="font-size:26px;">Fournette has 94th percentile weight-adjusted speed. 2nd-best speed score for any RB weighing 235+ in last 10 years.
03-04-2017, 06:13 PM
<a class="" href='https://twitter.com/GrahamBarfield'>Graham Barfield<span> </span>@GrahamBarfield </a> <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/GrahamBarfield/status/837792428803436544' title="2:30 PM - 3 Mar 2017">24h24 hours ago</a>
<div>
<div>
<div>More
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="" style="font-size:26px;">With a 6.57 three-cone, Christian McCaffrey is one of the most agile RBs in the last 15 years. It shows in his data: <a class="" href='https://t.co/oRmC9KbWPT' title="https://www.fantasyguru.com/articles/yards-created-christian-mccaffrey">https://www.fantasyguru.com/articles/yards-created-christian-mccaffrey …</a>
<div>
<div>
<div>More
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="" style="font-size:26px;">With a 6.57 three-cone, Christian McCaffrey is one of the most agile RBs in the last 15 years. It shows in his data: <a class="" href='https://t.co/oRmC9KbWPT' title="https://www.fantasyguru.com/articles/yards-created-christian-mccaffrey">https://www.fantasyguru.com/articles/yards-created-christian-mccaffrey …</a>
03-04-2017, 06:16 PM
<div><a class="" href='https://twitter.com/GrahamBarfield'>Graham Barfield <span style="color:rgb(177,187,195);">@GrahamBarfield</span></a>
<div>
<div> Follow
</div>
<div>
<div>More
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="" style="font-size:26px;">Official weight-adjusted speed (percentile score relative to last 15 years) and z-scores for the 2017 RBs if you're into that sort of thing:
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
![[Image: C6GtNWiU0AACuSv.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C6GtNWiU0AACuSv.jpg)
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(41,47,51);font-family:Arial, sans-serif;">
<ul class="">[*]
</ul>
</div>
03-04-2017, 06:18 PM
Quote:But they don't give heights down to the fraction of an inch like they should. I want to know if Shaheen is 6' 5 1/2" or is he 6' 6 1/4".
Charles Robinson<span style="font-size:.9em;"><span style="color:rgb(29,161,242);">Verified account</span> </span>@CharlesRobinson Mar 2
<div>
<div>
<div>More
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="font-size:26px;">#Ashland TE Adam Shaheen: 6-6 1/2, 278 pounds, 9 5/8 hands, 80 1/4 wingspan. #NFLCombine
This twitter account has them.
03-04-2017, 06:22 PM
Would be a crime for them to make these numbers public so we don't have to rely on media tweets?
03-04-2017, 06:30 PM
Quote:
<div style="margin-left:58px;">
<div>Graham Barfield <span style="color:rgb(177,187,195);">@GrahamBarfield</span>
<div>
<div> Follow
</div>
<div>
<div>More
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p style="font-size:26px;">Official weight-adjusted speed (percentile score relative to last 15 years) and z-scores for the 2017 RBs if you're into that sort of thing:
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(41,47,51);font-family:Arial, sans-serif;">
</div>
</div>
These sure are some interesting numbers. I wouldn't get too caught up with those in the red because most players are going to naturally end up there, but it takes something special to break the mold and get into the blues. A few players who already caught my eye iand show up here nclude McNichols, Mack and Hill. Hill makes sense because when you watch him run he totally hasn't a 2nd, super-fast gear that he shifts into, and he's not by any means a small guy. Hill is a big RB with speed, and he can cut.
03-04-2017, 06:36 PM
How comes there's no 3 cone drill times for the running backs?
03-04-2017, 06:39 PM
Mayock says coaches have told him there will be cornerbacks taken in the 5th round who would be 2nd round picks in other years.