Quote:Have you seen our defense? Have you seen our schedule next year? I can't imagine that defense being completely overhauled over the course of one year. If we get to 8-8 I will be shocked and happy.
Agreed. This defense will take atleast two offseasons to fix. The offense is going to have to take it to the next level for us to become playoff contendera, and the defense will have to become top 20.
Quote:Why are people mad about this. I'm happy they kept Gus but 1 year means nothing in this league. They could fire him tomorrow if they wanted too. No need for overreaction.
on this board... over reaction?
noooooo
Quote:They're talking about it on 1010XL right now, and they're saying the extension is meaningless in almost every way except when the team is looking at free agents. Players may not be as willing to come here if they think the coaching situation could change, and having a coach in the final year of his contract would certainly be reason for second thought.
Agree or not, giving Bradley a 1 year extension doesn't prevent him from being fired if he doesn't deliver in 2016. Nothing has changed about that. If the team isn't competing for a playoff spot and the division next year, Gus is going to take the fall.
Agreed. In fact Caldwell said as much in the press release.
Quote:“For an organization that we believe is ready to make its move, extending Gus through the 2017 season provides our club with much-needed stability in every respect,” General Manager Dave Caldwell said in a statement. “It solidifies Gus’ good standing with our current players, provides certainty for free agents who may be considering the Jaguars and helps to deliver the continuity throughout our coaching staff that we think is critical for us to turn the corner. It also gives us the best opportunity to win in 2016. I appreciate Shad supporting this approach as we enter a pivotal season with high expectations at every level of the organization.”
Quote:So what you're saying is blame it on Dave, not Gus. Dave is the one who let go any player with any significant talent that first year. Right when Dave came on board, any player we had that had any age to them was let go. He stripped this roster and made it as bad as possible.
5 year plan is laughable to me. A 5 year plan to a GM is a 5 year plan of job security. I feel like Dave is playing this perfectly.
Why are we constantly looking to blame somebody? Has it occurred to you that this team would be bad regardless who can in so this is the same process anyone one else would take? They came in building up a bad 2-14 team. Also I hate constantly talking about this but who were this difference makers David let go of? I was aware of him cutting Charles Woodson and Von Miller caliber players. He let a few guys go who would have no impact on the win total what so ever. Brandon Marshall and Daryl Smith would have not carried this team to the playoffs like Keuchley and Davis Jr. Just stop
Quote:Won't players just see he is only on a one year deal or are we assuming they are all dummies?
Nobody is saying they're all dummies. I'm not even saying I agree with the logic. I'm simply saying THAT is the logic they used to explain the extension. To be fair, for some players, if all things are equal and it comes down to picking a team in free agency, it very well could come down to who is coaching it. Gus is still seen as a player's coach, so when they look at their options, he may actually be the best one available. It will have nothing to do with his past struggles. It'll be about who a high priced free agent wants to play for.
Quote:You can tow the company line as hard as you want but in the end all Free agents care about is money, not if Gus will be my coach next season.
No, that's not all they care about, but I can understand why you'd think so. Thinking beyond the base instinct isn't in your DNA.
Quote:This will fall on deaf ears. People seem to think Jacksonville has the same allure as New York of Philly. In reality we are a town that has huge growth potential but that's it. The only way to really build this franchise is to create stability and build through the draft. FA is good because we have the money to over pay anyone we want but the truth is the draft is gonna be our bread and butter and that takes time.
See teams like the 9ers can suck for the next 8 years and not bat an eye because they know they have a stable fan base, ownership and will acquire a ton of great players in the process to make another run. Unfortunately our franchise is not old enough to have endured such hardships so we have not been exposed to the Tim Ratays and Joey Harringtons of the world (although Blaine was really close).
I just laughed when I heard this because I knew everyone on this board would react just like this. It's still funny. I'm sorry we aren't a once in a generation power house like the Pats but that is just not the norm. Somebody stated that the last 13 out of 15 Super Bowls featured Manning, Brady or Big Ben. If that does tell you that there are tons of team waiting at home every year then I don't know what to say.
This team is improving and the arrow is pointing up wether people want to see it our not. Instead for throwing hissy fits when the team doesn't do something you like why not support them and try to understand the big picture? Look at it from a larger scope. I think most would rather be right than to actually see the team succeed. And guess what if in ample enough time we don't continue to see improvement then will we gut the front office and build it over again.
I'd rather have these guys excel though.
Well put.
Quote:He's afraid to disagree with whatever this organization does. I never see him do it. Maybe he does and just doesn't want to display it on the message board.
Once again, thanks for showing the board that your reading comprehension skills are only rivaled by the steaming heap my dog dropped in the back yard this morning.
I've said in this very thread that I don't really agree with extending Gus at this point, but hey, at least you got to get that drool bib a little wetter, right?
Quote:So then why be upset about it?
This happens all the time. Coaches rarely go into a season with only one year left on their contract. It's all for show.
The deep "thinkers" on this board don't get it and never will. It doesn't fit into their torch and pitchfork mental breakdown.
Extending this contract by 1 year is nothing more than a token move. If they were truly committed to Bradley, the extension would have included multiple years, not 1.
Quote:The deep "thinkers" on this board don't get it and never will. It doesn't fit into their torch and pitchfork mental breakdown.
Extending this contract by 1 year is nothing more than a token move. If they were truly committed to Bradley, the extension would have included multiple years, not 1.
You know I'm hoping for some winning to eliminate the fan vs fan arguments. I'm starting to set my expectations for 2016 and I am using a wait and see approach overall but I'm dissatisfied as a fan. When you think about it 31 of 32 teams are disappointed every year.
Quote:Why are we constantly looking to blame somebody? Has it occurred to you that this team would be bad regardless who can in so this is the same process anyone one else would take? They came in building up a bad 2-14 team. Also I hate constantly talking about this but who were this difference makers David let go of? I was aware of him cutting Charles Woodson and Von Miller caliber players. He let a few guys go who would have no impact on the win total what so ever. Brandon Marshall and Daryl Smith would have not carried this team to the playoffs like Keuchley and Davis Jr. Just stop
Want to know why? because there are coaches that were hired at the same time as Gus that are in the playoffs right now. There are coaches that were on the brink of being fired when Gus was being hired, and guess what, NFC Championship!
Everyone here is so complacent and talks about how its a 5 year plan. It's absolutely freaking garbage. While we continue to accept mediocrity, other teams fans get to enjoy the playoffs and remember what its like to win a few games.
Your last point is ridiculous. We wouldn't have one a Super Bowl with them, but they are important pieces that could have helped us out. Daryl Smith wanted to stay in Jax and is just as good as Poz, and can cover receivers just as well...but Dave thought he was too old and wanted his guy.
I only opened this thread to watch all the whiners implode.
Silly free agents. So glad they are all dumb and can't put two and two together like the rest of the people in this thread.
Quote:Want to know why? because there are coaches that were hired at the same time as Gus that are in the playoffs right now. There are coaches that were on the brink of being fired when Gus was being hired, and guess what, NFC Championship!
Everyone here is so complacent and talks about how its a 5 year plan. It's absolutely freaking garbage. While we continue to accept mediocrity, other teams fans get to enjoy the playoffs and remember what its like to win a few games.
Your last point is ridiculous. We wouldn't have one a Super Bowl with them, but they are important pieces that could have helped us out. Daryl Smith wanted to stay in Jax and is just as good as Poz, and can cover receivers just as well...but Dave thought he was too old and wanted his guy.
Smith wanted too much money coming off a major injury. Not resigning him was perfectly reasonable.
Keeping Gus after last season's fiasco is not reasonable.
Quote:Silly free agents. So glad they are all dumb and can't put two and two together like the rest of the people in this thread.
Silly message boarders. So glad they are so dumb that they actually think a free agent is concerned who the coach is instead of the amount and length of their individual contract.
Quote:Silly message boarders. So glad they are so dumb that they actually think a free agent is concerned who the coach is instead of the amount and length of their individual contract.
So why the need to show confidence in your coach?
Quote:Smith wanted too much money coming off a major injury. Not resigning him was perfectly reasonable.
Keeping Gus after last season's fiasco is not reasonable.
Actually at the time there were quite a few rumors that he was more than willing to give a home town discount. It's not like Baltimore broke the bank to get him. His contract was cheaper than Pozlusny....by about half.
Edit: I have no problem keeping Gus, but up to this point I have an issue with how the process has been managed. I look more at Dave than Gus.
Quote:Almost anybody available is most likely better. Gus is amongst the worst coaches of all time in terms of wins and losses.
He went 5-11 with a rather ho hum roster. We have 75 mil and a GM determined to fix the defense. Things are on the up and up.
Doesn't this bring Bradley and Caldwell's contract length to match?
Seems pretty hollow. Nothing's changed in my mind.
The defense has to take a leap forward or he's out.
Quote:So why the need to show confidence in your coach?
They have confidence in their plan. Mr Khan, Caldwell, have stated this publicly many times. I don't understand how anyone could not know this.
Not to mention that every player that has come into contact with Bradley have said that they believe in him and would run through walls for him. Their effort through a tough couple of years have certainly shown that they do not quit on him.
Quote:Actually at the time there were quite a few rumors that he was more than willing to give a home town discount. It's not like Baltimore broke the bank to get him. His contract was cheaper than Pozlusny....by about half.
Edit: I have no problem keeping Gus, but up to this point I have an issue with how the process has been managed. I look more at Dave than Gus.
He wouldn't stay for the vet minimum and I don't think much more than that was in the offering. I wish he'd stayed too, but I understand Caldwell's position on a 31 year old linebacker coming off a season ending injury.
Pathetic, why do it before the failure that will be the 2016 season?