Quote:https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=ch...definition
Note the word SECRET.
My INTENT was to show that Global Warming Climate Change is a political topic. But you are right in saying that SCOTUS would twist someone's actual intent to get the result they wanted.
Admit you were wrong. There's no shame. 
Wow, so it's a political topic and not a conspiracy, because it's out in the open that NASA and other agencies want to take over the world using climate change? Oh wow, Malabar. Just wow!
What exactly about their evil plot is out in the open? What should I be seeing that I'm missing here?
So it is a conspiracy? Or it isn't a conspiracy? I'm getting really confused.
I mean, can conspiracies be hidden in plain sight? That's your implication isn't it?
Seriously, how can you deny that you are refuting the vast majority of scientific research, then talk about conspiracy, and then hide behind the fact that the conspiracy is out in the open so therefore it's not a conspiracy?
It's hurting my brain trying to follow your defense of something you should just admit you said, and were wrong about.
“NASA sponsors research into many areas of cutting-edge scientific inquiry, including the relationship between carbon dioxide and climate," the agency's chief scientist, Dr. Waleed Abdalati, told The Huffington Post in an email. "As an agency, NASA does not draw conclusions and issue 'claims' about research findings. We support open scientific inquiry and discussion...If the authors of this letter disagree with specific scientific conclusions made public by NASA scientists, we encourage them to join the debate in the scientific literature or public forums rather than restrict any discourse.”
When did liberals stop believing in the new world order? It's been talked about in open for decades?
Quote:When did liberals stop believing in the new world order? It's been talked about in open for decades?
You mean... the
Conspiracy Theory?
Don't tell me you also believe Jet fuel doesn't met steel, and that We never landed on the moon.
Quote:Say what now?
Just about every president since FDR has referenced a new world order. For the longest time it was liberals that rallied against a new world order as numerous republican presidents referenced a new world order.
To pretend the momentum towards a global currency and government doesn't exist is to deny reality post ww2. It's not a conspiracy if their talking about it in the public arena.
Quote:You mean... the Conspiracy Theory?
Don't tell me you also believe Jet fuel doesn't met steel, and that We never landed on the moon.
We landed on the moon the real question is why we stopped going to the moon. Or out of earths orbit for 40 years.
And jet fuel doesn't melt steel.
Quote:When did liberals stop believing in the new world order? It's been talked about in open for decades?
You've lost your mind if you think hw Bush was a liberal.
Quote:You've lost your mind if you think hw Bush was a liberal.
No I said it was liberals that openly opposed the New world order talk when Bush Sr was president. And Bush Sr wasn't liberal but he was a big government republican just a different shade of authoritarian to me.
Quote:No I said it was liberals that openly opposed the New world order talk when Bush Sr was president. And Bush Sr wasn't liberal but he was a big government republican just a different shade of authoritarian to me.
Only things I remember about Bush Sr. were:
"Read My Lips: Go To Texas"
He didn't like Broccoli (3rd best Vegetable after Potatoes and Corn tbh)
Gulf War
Norman Schwarzkopf
His son was President, and his other son plans on running for President (Or at least he plans on planning on running)
Quote:Only things I remember about Bush Sr. were:
"Read My Lips: Go To Texas"
He didn't like Broccoli (3rd best Vegetable after Potatoes and Corn tbh)
Gulf War
Norman Schwarzkopf
His son was President, and his other son plans on running for President (Or at least he plans on planning on running)
I'll find the video there's a video of all the times our presidents have referred to a new world order. Point is it's not a conspiracy there has been an open push by the political class to establish a new world order for a long time.
Quote:Only things I remember about Bush Sr. were:
"Read My Lips: Go To Texas"
He didn't like Broccoli (3rd best Vegetable after Potatoes and Corn tbh)
Gulf War
Norman Schwarzkopf
His son was President, and his other son plans on running for President (Or at least he plans on planning on running)
Jeb Bush announced his candidacy two weeks ago.
Quote:Jeb Bush announced his candidacy two weeks ago.
Well excuse me for not keeping up with the 200 republican nominees
Quote:Well excuse me for not keeping up with the 200 republican nominees
Well it was broadcast on the "evil" FOX News network as well as CNN. Not sure if MSNBC or The Daily Show covered it, so perhaps that's why you didn't know. :thumbsup:
Quote:Well it was broadcast on the "evil" FOX News network as well as CNN. Not sure if MSNBC or The Daily Show covered it, so perhaps that's why you didn't know. :thumbsup:
Did you know studies have shown that people who exclusively watch FoxNews actually know less about the world than if they didn't watch any news at all? That's means you get more straight talk standing around the water cooler at work than you do from everybody's favorite 24 hr infotainment broadcasting. Also, did you know that the Daily Show is actually one of the best sources of actual news around?
Anyways, more shenanigans from the corporate right:
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://wtop.com/dc/2015/06/smithsonian-to-improve-ethics-policies-on-research-funding/'>http://wtop.com/dc/2015/06/smithsonian-to-improve-ethics-policies-on-research-funding/</a>
Quote:Well it was broadcast on the "evil" FOX News network as well as CNN. Not sure if MSNBC or The Daily Show covered it, so perhaps that's why you didn't know. :thumbsup:
The Daily Show isn't bad for news actually. Just like FOX isn't bad for comedy. But I digress. Some of us don't follow the presidential primaries when nothing is going on. Especially when the first primary isn't for another 6 months. We're going to be oversaturated with these candidates to the point where the debates will be pointless.