Quote:So you dont know, you dont know wjat ur proposing and u link to an article that shows u dont know what capitalism really is. So sad.
Yah, it's a real travesty, let me tell you.
<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/02/04/forests-are-supposed-to-help-stop-climate-change-these-forests-didnt/'>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/02/04/forests-are-supposed-to-help-stop-climate-change-these-forests-didnt/</a>
The science doesn't stop. It keeps going. Always improving. What was once true becomes false if that's what's proven. Scientists are just telling you what they know to the best of their knowledge. It's a shame your politics won't let you be open minded like the scientists are.
Quote:So you dont know, you dont know wjat ur proposing and u link to an article that shows u dont know what capitalism really is. So sad.
Capitalism is about exploiting cheap labor and resources to produce goods for maximum net profits, even at the detriment of society and the environment.
Ignorant childish emotional ranting.
Quote:Capitalism is about exploiting cheap labor and resources to produce goods for maximum net profits, even at the detriment of society and the environment. the worst economic model possible except for all the others.
FTFY.
Quote:Ignorant childish emotional ranting.
...is exactly what you are doing.
It never ceases to amaze me how easy the Right **projects**
It's a extremely common psychological response I'm seeing on this board. Just crazy talk.
So basically only teach one side, the very mention of the opposition should be outlawed zieg hiel and all that. We get it.
Quote:So basically only teach one side, the very mention of the opposition should be outlawed zieg hiel and all that. We get it.
The science is easy if you are interested. There are not two sides to this story.
Yes there are. If there was a direct mathematical correlation to an exponential variable (human CO2) then you would see an exponential increase in temperature not 18 years of relative stasis.
If u really understood that u would know to be embarassed when u rail on and on about 1/10th of 1 degree.
Saddly any time you are challenged on your personal understanding you either copy and paste or u cop out with "the science is so simple"
You stll havent addressed the fact that man isnt responsible for anywhere near the majority of CO2 enissions. If u go do a little research i might be able to have a conversation with u about the fact CO2 isnt responsible for more than 5% of the greenhouse affect.
Quote:Yes there are. If there was a direct mathematical correlation to an exponential variable (human CO2) then you would see an exponential increase in temperature not 18 years of relative stasis.
If u really understood that u would know to be embarassed when u rail on and on about 1/10th of 1 degree.
Saddly any time you are challenged on your personal understanding you either copy and paste or u cop out with "the science is so simple"
You stll havent addressed the fact that man isnt responsible for anywhere near the majority of CO2 enissions. If u go do a little research i might be able to have a conversation with u about the fact CO2 isnt responsible for more than 5% of the greenhouse affect.
You are obviously misguided as your position is not in line with what our best and brightest have proven.
For instance, your position does not agree with NASA's official statement on climate change.
That being said, do you think it is more likely that 1) you know better than NASA, 2) NASA is lying and is on the conspiracy or 3) you are wrong?
Lol. I directly pulled your card that you dont know what ur talking about and ur response is to hide?
There was signifigant decent to the idea of using a 100% oxygen environment on apollo 1. Nasa got that wrong. Earth orbit rendezvous was lying in a trash can. Theyve lost interplanetary probes because of unit conversions. They are really good. Theyre not perfect.
Quote:Lol. I directly pulled your card that you dont know what ur talking about and ur response is to hide?
There was signifigant decent to the idea of using a 100% oxygen environment on apollo 1. Nasa got that wrong. Earth orbit rendezvous was lying in a trash can. Theyve lost interplanetary probes because of unit conversions. They are really good. Theyre not perfect.
Wow! Option 1, huh? Bold move. Hope that works out for ya
Blind faith with little to no personal investment in subject matter...
Lenin had a phrase for that.
I always thought the argument libs are Nazis because they refuse to listen to the other side of evolution, or climate change, or dinosaurs never existed or if they did it was at the same time as humans. Comparable to saying that x group are Nazis because they refuse to listen to the ancient alien arguments.
Quote:I always thought the argument libs are Nazis because they refuse to listen to the other side of evolution, or climate change, or dinosaurs never existed or if they did it was at the same time as humans. Comparable to saying that x group are Nazis because they refuse to listen to the ancient alien arguments.
Dinasoura never existed?! Damn man break every 8 year olds heart why don't ya?
Quote:Blind faith with little to no personal investment in subject matter...
Lenin had a phrase for that.
Says the baby boomer. Honestly you can't make this crap up.
Quote:Says the baby boomer. Honestly you can't make this crap up.
Lol what?
Quote:Lol what?
You old and dum, he yung and smartz.
Quote:The science is easy if you are interested. There are not two sides to this story.
No no I'd love to here these other sides. Please start with the theory of relativity.
"here"
Our resident brainiac at it again...