Quote:Tha'ts my point. You haven't seen it because you don't want to see it. I agree that lastonealive and StroudCrowd have trolled throughout this thread, but it's trolls trolling trolls. That much is obvious to anyone looking at it objectively, which apparently you aren't.
Ex-Indy stating that comparing Manning's first 3 years to Luck's first 3 years is apples to apples is trolling. He refuses to concede the fact that the league is much more pass happy now, resulting in inflated stats. See here:
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://jungle.jaguars.com/index.php?/topic/5846-who-is-andrew-luck/?p=323848'>http://jungle.jaguars.com/index.php?/topic/5846-who-is-andrew-luck/?p=323848</a>
Ex-Indy hiding behind the veil of "a Super Bowl GM said Luck is the best young QB he's seen in 40 years, who am I to disagree?" is trolling.
Open your eyes.
I posted a link to a report that was 100% in topic of this post. Because you disagree with it does no make it trolling or less relevant to the original premise of the post.
Just because you want to exaggerate the effect of the rules being enforced and I disagree also isn't trolling. You weren't even a teen when Manning was a rookie. The laughable part is when people claim the rules were changed when the rules themselves have not been changed in over 20 years.
Actually your responses were more along the lines of trolling. If you don't like the link try refuting it before when is given.
Quote:When has he trolled? I haven't seen it.
Him stating he doesn't think the Broncos will win a Super Bowl with Peyton at QB is an opinion. SC stating that there won't be anything Colts related in the Hall of Fame for Peyton is a joke and a troll post. Just read some of SC's stuff. It's ridiculous.
"peyton manning wont win another superbowl" is not an opinion. that is a statement made as fact.
an opinion would be...... i dont think peyton manning will win another superbowl.
a lot of people here apparently dont know what an opinion is.
Quote:I posted a link to a report that was 100% in topic of this post. Because you disagree with it does no make it trolling or less relevant to the original premise of the post.
Just because you want to exaggerate the effect of the rules being enforced and I disagree also isn't trolling. You weren't even a teen when Manning was a rookie. The laughable part is when people claim the rules were changed when the rules themselves have not been changed in over 20 years.
Actually your responses were more along the lines of trolling. If you don't like the link try refuting it before when is given.
the rules have been changed. its a fact. i listed some of the more prominent ones somewhere that i dont even remember already and you refuse to acknowledge that.
youre a blue and white glasses wearing, ignoramus.
Quote:"peyton manning wont win another superbowl" is not an opinion. that is a statement made as fact.
an opinion would be...... i dont think peyton manning will win another superbowl.
a lot of people here apparently dont know what an opinion is.
Semantics. Clearly I am speaking what I believe will happen as I have zero effect on the game. I think Indy matches up with Denver well. They have the defensive backfield it requires to play aggressive man coverage which can be successful against Manning led offenses.
So I don't think they make it to the SB. Obviously I believe Indy can and may stop them. I believe that Colts are at least the 2nd team of the AFC. I just don't think much separates 1&2. I like our defense better than Denvers.
Quote:Semantics. Clearly I am speaking what I believe will happen as I have zero effect on the game. I think Indy matches up with Denver well. They have the defensive backfield it requires to play aggressive man coverage which can be successful against Manning led offenses.
So I don't think they make it to the SB. Obviously I believe Indy can and may stop them. I believe that Colts are at least the 2nd team of the AFC. I just don't think much separates 1&2. I like our defense better than Denvers.
i wish the colts played the broncos this year so we would know who would win that match up.......
Quote:i wish the colts played the broncos this year so we would know who would win that match up.......
Yes week 1 is always indicative of how a full season will unravel. Denver will find that the Colts are an extremely better squad than week 1. The defense is playing out of this world now and has done it against good and bad teams. Personally I would guess Colts Fans would feel confident now. Would have to ask CW.
Quote:Yes week 1 is always indicative of how a full season will unravel. Denver will find that the Colts are an extremely better squad than week 1. The defense is playing out of this world now and has done it against good and bad teams. Personally I would guess Colts Fans would feel confident now. Would have to ask CW.
the point remains, the broncos beat the colts this year, the broncos were in the superbowl last year, but hey....... youre entitled to your opinion, even if you dont understand when you state it as fact.
Quote:the point remains, the broncos beat the colts this year, the broncos were in the superbowl last year, but hey....... youre entitled to your opinion, even if you dont understand when you state it as fact.
Most people with simple common sense wouldn't need the person to differentiate their opinion from fact? Duval county schools?
Quote:Most people with simple common sense wouldn't need the person to differentiate their opinion from fact? Duval county schools?
i grew up in NY but valiant effort. i dont see how someone could misconstrude a statement of "he's not winning another ring" with "i don't think he wins another ring."
thats not a common sense misconception.
peyton manning is having pizza for dinner. - that would mean that he is having pizza.
i think peyton manning is having pizza. - that would mean that i believe peyton manning is having pizza for dinner but there is a possibility that he isnt.
marion county schools?
Quote:i grew up in NY but valiant effort. i dont see how someone could misconstrude a statement of "he's not winning another ring" with "i don't think he wins another ring."
thats not a common sense misconception.
peyton manning is having pizza for dinner. - that would mean that he is having pizza.
i think peyton manning is having pizza. - that would mean that i believe peyton manning is having pizza for dinner but there is a possibility that he isnt.
marion county schools?
There is no reason to preface every opinion. Especially with results of sporting events. When the talking heads pick their games how many say I think or I believe? Never they just tell you a result. Quit being obstinate.
Quote:There is no reason to preface every opinion. Especially with results of sporting events. When the talking heads pick their games how many say I think or I believe? Never they just tell you a result. Quit being obstinate.
it took you 17 minutes to find obstinate in a thesauras, didnt it?
Quote:
Tha'ts my point. You haven't seen it because you don't want to see it. I agree that lastonealive and StroudCrowd have trolled throughout this thread, but it's trolls trolling trolls. That much is obvious to anyone looking at it objectively, which apparently you aren't.
Ex-Indy stating that comparing Manning's first 3 years to Luck's first 3 years is apples to apples is trolling. He refuses to concede the fact that the league is much more pass happy now, resulting in inflated stats. See here:
http://jungle.jaguars.com/index.php?/top.../?p=323848
Ex-Indy hiding behind the veil of "a Super Bowl GM said Luck is the best young QB he's seen in 40 years, who am I to disagree?" is trolling.
Open your eyes.
Why does everyone on here think I read through every page, thread, & post? I don't have that kind of time.
It's still no where on the level of SC/lastonealive
Quote:"peyton manning wont win another superbowl" is not an opinion. that is a statement made as fact.
an opinion would be...... i dont think peyton manning will win another superbowl.
a lot of people here apparently dont know what an opinion is.
LOL
Quote:it took you 17 minutes to find obstinate in a thesauras, didnt it?
While clearly not of the liberal education and more into the engineering and maths. I can assure you obstinate wasn't a word I needed help with. It was spelled out time many times as a youth.
But as one who doesn't take grammar as serious on these here interwebs, I amused when someone tries to talk smack then makes an obvious mistake.
Anyways back on topic. Andrew has answered the bell in the articles posted on PG1.
Quote:More than some guy. Way more NFL football knowledge than you or I currently have. Let me know when you build a SB champion.
Are you incapable of having your own opinion?
Quote:Are you incapable of having your own opinion?
yes, he is. charlie casserley must have told him that peyton is done winning superbowls.
Quote:Are you incapable of having your own opinion?
Ah see my opinion in the report was already posted!
Is this still going on? Luck is a top 3 QB right now. Indy purposely tanked and then ran Peyton out of town on a rail to get him, but we just have to deal with it. It is what it is.
He's definitely got better than his mediocre first 2 seasons.
Still happy they have Luck rather than Manning though
Quote:Why does everyone on here think I read through every page, thread, & post? I don't have that kind of time.
It's still no where on the level of SC/lastonealive
LOL
Well, if you read through this thread, you would see me call out lastonealive repeatedly. I call a spade a spade. You make excuses for his trolling, when you could better this thread by calling him out.
What have I done that constitutes trolling?
Are you still upset that I may have mistaken you for someone else in regards to DRob?
Hope you have a thicker skin at work!