Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Trump Can't Win
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
Quote: 

This is why there some who like the guy..he calls it like it is...One can make up their own mind on the type of person that supports him to represent this country

Some tweets...

 

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/....html?_r=1

 

<div style="font-family:'nyt-franklin';font-size:21px;color:rgb(51,51,51);">New Jersey
STATE

<div>“deeply troubled”
 
Lol...until now I bet....since Ralph Kramden has endorsed him
</div>
 

</div>
 

This just in:

 

A fat kid, after weeks of being beaten, has given his lunch money to the schoolyard bully.
Trump will win the Republican ticket unless the party takes it away from him, because he has the popular votes = Delegates (according to all the polls & predictions) at this point.

John Oliver absolutely killed the guy...
Quote:Trump will win the Republican ticket unless the party takes it away from him, because he has the popular votes = Delegates (according to all the polls & predictions) at this point.


So he's Bernie Sanders then?
Quote:John Oliver absolutely killed the guy...
 

who?
Quote:John Oliver absolutely killed the guy...


Id say you just lost all credibility but youd have to have some to start with.
Quote:Id say you just lost all credibility but youd have to have some to start with.


Look who is talking. John Oliver has his own show on HBO for a reason. Even if you can't agree with his politics, you have to respect him.
Quote:Look who is talking. John Oliver has his own show on HBO for a reason. Even if you can't agree with his politics, you have to respect him.
 

Why should I respect someone because they are on TV?
Quote:Why should I respect someone because they are on TV?


No, because they have been successful on tv shining a spotlight on societal ills with the intention to make the world a better place which is a noble pursuit.
Quote:No, because they have been successful on tv shining a spotlight on societal ills with the intention to make the world a better place which is a noble pursuit.
 

Why does John Oliver condemn the European states for rejecting Muslim migrants but ignore mass wave of crime and rape they brought, such as the Cologne rape gangs? That doesn't seem so noble to me. Seems biased. Is John Oliver biased?
Quote:Why should I respect someone because they are on TV?

Why should I respect someone because they made a lot of money?
Quote:Why does John Oliver condemn the European states for rejecting Muslim migrants but ignore mass wave of crime and rape they brought, such as the Cologne rape gangs? That doesn't seem so noble to me. Seems biased. Is John Oliver biased?
Right, the mass wave of crime that is completely absent in crime statistics and that no scientific research can seem to locate and no-one has first hand experience of. Query; can you ignore something that doesn't exist?

 

As for the Cologne case; how come incidents like that are enough to condemn entire populations, yet numerous mass shootings aren't enough to condemn the gun owning population? Seems like double standard to me. 
Quote:Right, the mass wave of crime that is completely absent in crime statistics and that no scientific research can seem to locate and no-one has first hand experience of. Query; can you ignore something that doesn't exist?

 

As for the Cologne case; how come incidents like that are enough to condemn entire populations, yet numerous mass shootings aren't enough to condemn the gun owning population? Seems like double standard to me. 
 

Sweden is currently drowning in Muslim immigrants and crime and you (and John Oliver) ignore that. Truly a sad time for western civilization.

 

http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/swedish-cops-...rime-wave/

http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/23/sweden...pan-didnt/

 

Because there is a supposed double-standard, John Oliver is exempt from being unbiased?

 

What a terrible journalist he is. He shouldn't be on television, to be honest.
Quote:Sweden is currently drowning in Muslim immigrants and crime and you (and John Oliver) ignore that. Truly a sad time for western civilization.

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/swedish-cops-drowning-in-muslim-migrant-crime-wave/'>http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/swedish-cops-drowning-in-muslim-migrant-crime-wave/</a>
<a class="bbc_url" href='http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/23/sweden-opened-its-doors-to-muslim-immigration-today-its-the-rape-capital-of-the-west-japan-didnt/'>http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/23/sweden-opened-its-doors-to-muslim-immigration-today-its-the-rape-capital-of-the-west-japan-didnt/</a>


Because there is a supposed double-standard, John Oliver is exempt from being unbiased?


What a terrible journalist he is. He shouldn't be on television, to be honest.


Let's be honest, you don't like him because he craps on Trump. And you are a Trump vote. It's that simple.
Quote:Right, the mass wave of crime that is completely absent in crime statistics and that no scientific research can seem to locate and no-one has first hand experience of. Query; can you ignore something that doesn't exist?

 

As for the Cologne case; how come incidents like that are enough to condemn entire populations, yet numerous mass shootings aren't enough to condemn the gun owning population? Seems like double standard to me. 
 

lol you really are delusional
if somebody punches you and steals your wallet, you need to wait for "crime statistics" to tell you if it really happened. haaaaaaa

Quote:Sweden is currently drowning in Muslim immigrants and crime and you (and John Oliver) ignore that. Truly a sad time for western civilization.

 

http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/swedish-cops-...rime-wave/

http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/23/sweden...pan-didnt/

 

Because there is a supposed double-standard, John Oliver is exempt from being unbiased?

 

What a terrible journalist he is. He shouldn't be on television, to be honest.
Let's analyse shall we?

 

First article is from wnd.com, I'm not familiar with the site but it's about describes as such: "For 18 years, WND has been the world’s best-kept secret in Christian content and marketing." Let's all cut to the chase; Christian means conservative, not exactly unbiased there. Then again, the counterpoint here is John Oliver and I'm not going to pretend he's unbiased so let's say that cancels each other out. The about page all spend an awful lot of space talking about all the books and films and "resources" they sell.

 

On the article itself though; direct references to scientific research: zero. There is a reference to a report noting a jump in incidents from 148 in 2018 to 322 in 2015. The article also says there were 163,000 applications in 2015. Even is you assuming there were no applications still waiting to be processed that a rate of 197.5 incidents per application. Violent crime across the US in 2013 was at 242.3 per 100,000 and it's never made clear what an "incident" is, could be as minor as scuffle or a verbal argument.

 

Second article is from the Daily Caller, which is openly conservative so not exactly unbiased here either but for the same reasons mentioned above; I'll ignore that for now. Amazingly, in the article itself I count 1 reference in the first 8 paragraphs. That reference is a report that says "It noted that Muslim immigrants from North Africa were 23 times more likely to commit rape than Swedish men." while I don't doubt the report the 8 paragraphs have numerous unsubstantiated claims. Then it attempts to Sweden to Japan, with this notable sentence ''Thus, the Japanese make no bones about it: they are Islamophobic." basic knowledge of Japanese culture should tell anyone it's an inherently xenophobic culture. They distrust anyone not Japanese, not just Muslims. Just ask the Japanese citizens with Korean or Chinese heritage.

 

As for rape statistics: Sweden is at 63.5/100,000; US is at 27.3/100,000 but the US uses a much stricter definition of rape as indicated by the official term "forcible rape", Sweden's definition of rape is much wider and it also counts each instance separately thus inflating figures. But let's look at little deeper; If we look purely at the numbers we see the highest developed nation outside of Sweden is Australia (28.6) followed by Belgium (27.9) and the US (27.3), if we continue other notables are Norway (19.2), France (16.2), and my own country the Netherlands (7.6). EU average is 10.19.

 

Now let's look at the Muslim populations of those countries: Australia: 2.2%, Belgium 6%, US: 0.9%, Norway: 2.4%, France; ~8%, Netherlands: 5%. Amazingly, the two countries with the lowest percentage of Muslims have the highest percentage of rapes. Of the two countries with the highest percentage of Muslims, one has one of the higher rates and the other has a significantly lower rate. The other two don't appear to have a correlation either; Norway's Muslim population is half that of the Netherlands but it's reported rapes are three times as high. It's almost as if there are zero conclusions we can draw from rape statistics.

 

But here something that has proven true time and time again; crime rate of all sorts drop as socioeconomic status rises. In every country, in every population, in every religion, it's the same story: poverty breeds crime. And immigrants, especially refugees, are poor. 
Quote:if somebody punches you and steals your wallet, you need to wait for "crime statistics" to tell you if it really happened. haaaaaaa
Anecdotal evidence isn't evidence.
Quote:Sweden is currently drowning in Muslim immigrants and crime and you (and John Oliver) ignore that. Truly a sad time for western civilization.

 

http://www.wnd.com/2016/01/swedish-cops-...rime-wave/

http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/23/sweden...pan-didnt/

 

Because there is a supposed double-standard, John Oliver is exempt from being unbiased?

 

What a terrible journalist he is. He shouldn't be on television, to be honest.
 

He's not a journalist, he's a social and political satirist, one who exposes your boy Trump for what he is. That you think he's a journalist goes a long way towards explaining why you've been duped by Trump.
Quote:He's not a journalist, he's a social and political satirist, one who exposes your boy Trump for what he is. That you think he's a journalist goes a long way towards explaining why you've been duped by Trump.
Yeah, that too.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44