Quote:People have been calling for accountability and benching people for not executing...now that Gus did that he's stupid...See how that works? People are so hung up on flaming Gus, when he does what people have been criticizing him for he's still stupid...That's the problem with benching people...The next guy is usually not as good as the guy benched and bad [BAD WORD REMOVED] happens...I have been one of the many calling for Gus to start being tougher on the players when they [BAD WORD REMOVED] up to show an example of either produce or you're not gonna see the field...This roster doesn't have deep enough depth to be able to bench people for poor play and yet fans still scream to do it, and when Gus does, he still wrong...This fan base is so anti Gus that no matter what bad happens, it's his fault and anything good has nothing to do with him...I swear if one of our players walked across the street to go to church and got hit by a city bus, it would be Gus's fault
People see the obvious...Gus is a very nice guy but terrible leader/coach. The only recurring fact is that "players like playing for him." I like bosses that don't hold me accountable too. I like bosses that pat me on the back and tell me good job every time I mess up. But those type of bosses rarely, if ever, get the best results possible. If they do, it's because the team is strong enough to overcome their lack of leadership.
Yesterday, the positive plays by the Jags and negative plays by the Bills were just enough to allow the Jags to win. And in light of that, they nearly loss if it wasn't for a bad PI call near the end to give the Jags life.
Big picture, I personally want a HC that I'm confident can lead this team deep in the playoffs. In year 3, Bradley still doesn't have this team prepared for the season, or games and horribly messes up in-game management (i.e. bad timeouts, challenges, play calls, etc.). All indications are that we have some talent on the team and that the HC is not good.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/coaches/
Gus is the only NFL head coach in history to coach 39 games and have 9 wins. The next closest coach with only 9 wins coached 34 games (Bob Waterfield).
So, let's
assume that stars align and Gus goes .500 the rest of the season (which I think everyone here would agree is not realistic). Let's
assume they go 5-4 the rest of the way which puts Gus's record at 14-34 in 48 games. Below is the company he's in.
Coaches with 14 or fewer wins in 48 or more games:
Mike Riley (14-34 in 48 games) *0 games in playoffs
Tom Fears (13-34-2 in 49 games) *0 games in playoffs
Jimmy Phelan (13-35-2 in 50 games) *0 games in playoffs
Steve Magnuolo (10-38 in 48 games) *0 games in playoffs
Rod Marinelli (10-38 in 48 games) *0 games in playoffs
Bert Bell (10-46-2 in 58 games) *0 games in playoffs
Not one of these coaches even took a team to the playoffs.
As others have pointed out, Bradley isn't just bad, he's historically all-time bad.
If you believe in Gus long-term, then you are ignoring all relevant facts, ignoring the eye-test, and believing that he is going to go down in history as a coach that turned a franchise around in a way that no other has ever done (assuming we make the playoffs at some point).