(06-07-2024, 10:00 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (06-07-2024, 08:08 AM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]Would it be possible to avoid complications with the vaccine if they lowered the dosage amount per round and spread out the frequency of the boosters or does it have to remain static as the protocol calls for today?
I know it's not going to be 100% guaranteed that nothing can go wrong. Life is a roll of the dice. We all have to make decisions and so forth. However, I am just curious if these pharmaceutical companies are taking these reports seriously and using it to fix or adjust their products.
People trusted them four years ago, these reports are now creating even bigger rifts and concerns with those who did follow the protocol and for those who ignored it from the very beginning. I only bring this up, because, it seems like we're due for another viral outbreak of some nature.
Possibly the Bird Flu again if reports and predictions are accurate. With the Bird Flu, we already have practice and vaccines in place for that today as it stands, correct? So, adequate studies and trials should be available to the public to make better educated decisions, correct?
I don't know much about the dosing schedule, so I have no idea if different volumes or timeframes would matter either way. I know that the manufacturers are constantly working on the vaccines much like they work on the annual flu vaccine. Vaccines are never really a finished product, they keep reworking and revising them to improve efficacy and efficiency. We still get new version of the Polio vaccine pretty regularly even though we've had a vaccine for it for decades. I think you vastly overestimate the general public's feelings about these vaccines, you are victimized by your perspective which is mostly limited to the extremes of the American political landscape. Billions of doses given around the world and still nothing major has come from any of the various brands or versions, regardless of how certain blowhorns fixate on statistically miniscule cases. And you're right, we are always on the verge of an outbreak, Nature is brutal.
I think the general public has an interesting landscape when it comes to the Covid vaccine. Especially now. You're either in the:
A. Never vaxed camp. I told you so all along stance.
B. Been vaxed. Have had no issues with it nor the boosters. Therefore, not my problem.
C. Have been vaxed. Felt complications, lost someone or something to that effect. Now pissed off with the reports coming out.
D. Silent majority that could be in either camp but just don't want to get belittled or beaten into the ground verbally for speaking up.
We had decisions to make four years ago when our son was born. He's up to date and current with Doctor recommendations vax wise. It's not like all of us have a problem with trusting the science. It was, like most things in life, the timing of it all.
It was mostly new to the market, there was widespread panic with widespread money to be had, the odds of the products having issues were there probability wise and now we're seeing some reports in the mainstream media to support it. Fauci's soundbites have done him absolutely no favors and the other side of this whole problem, is that, have we agreed or come to a consensus on the true origin and nature of Covid?
Conspiracy or not. It did come from Wuhan. It did come from China. It came at a very pivotal moment politically and it had and continues to have a lasting effect on society and various economies as a whole. So, that was always the interesting part to it for me.
How to create a vaccine or solution for something that may or may not have been man made? How do you study, practice or prepare for something like that? If they were able to produce it in a lab, add manipulating factors to it, to where it did seem to morph rather consistently, etc.
As you said, Nature is brutal. However, so is power and greed. And that's been in the equation with humanity now forever, but, now more than ever with advancements being made in various fields and tensions heating up, globally, in a literal and geopolitical sense.