(06-13-2023, 01:07 PM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ] (06-13-2023, 12:26 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]The Biden administration returning dignity to the White House.
This country is begging for a return of ultraconservatism. It's the White House Lawn. Not a Niki Minaj, Cardi B, Sam Smith or Lady Gaga concert. I hope they keep that same energy during breast cancer awareness month.
The White House condemned this so I’ll walk it back. Honestly, I fully expected the White House to celebrate it. Especially given the movement has such a hold on the left that college administrators told the women who complained about sharing a locker room with the fully intact tg swimmer to deal with it.
Now, let’s see if the White House sticks to their guns when the leftists complain.
(06-13-2023, 07:23 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]Tucker on Twitter.. Spot on, again!
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status...D1lqQ&s=19
Criticize the war and go to jail!!
That's pure bull [BLEEP].
Obama was on the record saying similar stuff... in 2002. "I am not against all war. I am against dumb wars." 2002! Yet "they" let Obama be President, twice, and have never tried to lock him up.
There are multiple reasons that multiple arms of multiple governments are trying to punish Trump. But speaking out against the war in Iraq, not one of them.
(06-13-2023, 08:28 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (06-13-2023, 07:23 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]Tucker on Twitter.. Spot on, again!
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status...D1lqQ&s=19
Criticize the war and go to jail!!
That's pure bull [BLEEP].
Obama was on the record saying similar stuff... in 2002. "I am not against all war. I am against dumb wars." 2002! Yet "they" let Obama be President, twice, and have never tried to lock him up.
There are multiple reasons that multiple arms of multiple governments are trying to punish Trump. But speaking out against the war in Iraq, not one of them.
I just don't care what you have to say.. What you say is completely irrelevant and unheralded. You're a contrarian, you've even admitted to it. That makes your comment and opinion inconsequential and meaningless..
(06-13-2023, 09:08 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (06-13-2023, 08:28 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]That's pure bull [BLEEP].
Obama was on the record saying similar stuff... in 2002. "I am not against all war. I am against dumb wars." 2002! Yet "they" let Obama be President, twice, and have never tried to lock him up.
There are multiple reasons that multiple arms of multiple governments are trying to punish Trump. But speaking out against the war in Iraq, not one of them.
I just don't care what you have to say.. What you say is completely irrelevant and unheralded. You're a contrarian, you've even admitted to it. That makes your comment and opinion inconsequential and meaningless..
That says it all right there.
(06-13-2023, 08:28 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (06-13-2023, 07:23 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]Tucker on Twitter.. Spot on, again!
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status...D1lqQ&s=19
Criticize the war and go to jail!!
That's pure bull [BLEEP].
Obama was on the record saying similar stuff... in 2002. "I am not against all war. I am against dumb wars." 2002! Yet "they" let Obama be President, twice, and have never tried to lock him up.
There are multiple reasons that multiple arms of multiple governments are trying to punish Trump. But speaking out against the war in Iraq, not one of them.
Obama loved bombing people. He was also a democrat so he has to pretend to not like war.
Trump being the only president since Reagan to not start a war says a lot. The uniparty loves war and all the government makes a ton of money off of it. The uniparty can launder a bunch of money back into the US and the party and members.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
(06-13-2023, 11:18 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ] (06-13-2023, 08:28 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]That's pure bull [BLEEP].
Obama was on the record saying similar stuff... in 2002. "I am not against all war. I am against dumb wars." 2002! Yet "they" let Obama be President, twice, and have never tried to lock him up.
There are multiple reasons that multiple arms of multiple governments are trying to punish Trump. But speaking out against the war in Iraq, not one of them.
Obama loved bombing people. He was also a democrat so he has to pretend to not like war.
Trump being the only president since Reagan to not start a war says a lot. The uniparty loves war and all the government makes a ton of money off of it. The uniparty can launder a bunch of money back into the US and the party and members.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
This. Obama was a war mongering [BLEEP] and he was the Drone Strike King during his two terms. He sold more arms internationally than any other administration and I think he even gave some money on the way out to Palestine just to [BLEEP] on our relationship, whether I like it or not, with Israel. Including the whole nuclear nonsense with Iran. He was another military industrial complex plant once he got inside the white house.
(06-13-2023, 11:18 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ] (06-13-2023, 08:28 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]That's pure bull [BLEEP].
Obama was on the record saying similar stuff... in 2002. "I am not against all war. I am against dumb wars." 2002! Yet "they" let Obama be President, twice, and have never tried to lock him up.
There are multiple reasons that multiple arms of multiple governments are trying to punish Trump. But speaking out against the war in Iraq, not one of them.
Obama loved bombing people. He was also a democrat so he has to pretend to not like war.
Trump being the only president since Reagan to not start a war says a lot. The uniparty loves war and all the government makes a ton of money off of it. The uniparty can launder a bunch of money back into the US and the party and members.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Tucker said that Trump became their enemy when he spoke out against the decision to invade Iraq in 2003.
I said that's false.
You reply that the reason Obama "got away with it" is because Obama ultimately played ball with the MIC.
If that's true, then the Trump also could have "gotten away with it" if he had "started a war" the way Obama did. Right?
And if that's true, then there was nothing fateful or determinative about Trump speaking out against the Iraq war, and you agree with me that Tucker's statements are false.
(06-13-2023, 09:08 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (06-13-2023, 08:28 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]That's pure bull [BLEEP].
Obama was on the record saying similar stuff... in 2002. "I am not against all war. I am against dumb wars." 2002! Yet "they" let Obama be President, twice, and have never tried to lock him up.
There are multiple reasons that multiple arms of multiple governments are trying to punish Trump. But speaking out against the war in Iraq, not one of them.
I just don't care what you have to say.. What you say is completely irrelevant and unheralded. You're a contrarian, you've even admitted to it. That makes your comment and opinion inconsequential and meaningless..
Contrarian just means "inclined to go against popular opinion."
So are you saying popular opinion is always right?
(06-14-2023, 10:27 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (06-13-2023, 11:18 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]Obama loved bombing people. He was also a democrat so he has to pretend to not like war.
Trump being the only president since Reagan to not start a war says a lot. The uniparty loves war and all the government makes a ton of money off of it. The uniparty can launder a bunch of money back into the US and the party and members.
Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Tucker said that Trump became their enemy when he spoke out against the decision to invade Iraq in 2003.
I said that's false.
You reply that the reason Obama "got away with it" is because Obama ultimately played ball with the MIC.
If that's true, then the Trump also could have "gotten away with it" if he had "started a war" the way Obama did. Right?
And if that's true, then there was nothing fateful or determinative about Trump speaking out against the Iraq war, and you agree with me that Tucker's statements are false.
(06-13-2023, 09:08 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]I just don't care what you have to say.. What you say is completely irrelevant and unheralded. You're a contrarian, you've even admitted to it. That makes your comment and opinion inconsequential and meaningless..
Contrarian just means "inclined to go against popular opinion."
So are you saying popular opinion is always right?
And that definition fits you to a Tee..
You can't rely on an opinion from someone who is a self identified contrarian. So if you're a self identified contrarian, your opinions should fall on deaf ears since we all know that your answers and opinions are biased and are meant to disrupt and cause conflict for the hell of it..
You're the boy who cried wolf.. Or in your case, cried Trump. You will take each topic and choose the most unpopular opinion or answer just to buck the system. So when you actually do (if ever) offer sound advice or an opinion, it will always be overlooked because of being a self identified contrarian..
You made your bed.. Now lay in it.
Also, the idea that Trump was more of a peacnik than Obama does not hold up to scrutiny. Trump left troop levels basically unchanged in Syria and Iraq. And Trump assassinated Iran's top military commander. I'm not saying any of this is right or wrong, it's just facts. Trump was just as much a friend of the MIC as Obama.
(06-14-2023, 10:41 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2023, 10:27 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Tucker said that Trump became their enemy when he spoke out against the decision to invade Iraq in 2003.
I said that's false.
You reply that the reason Obama "got away with it" is because Obama ultimately played ball with the MIC.
If that's true, then the Trump also could have "gotten away with it" if he had "started a war" the way Obama did. Right?
And if that's true, then there was nothing fateful or determinative about Trump speaking out against the Iraq war, and you agree with me that Tucker's statements are false.
Contrarian just means "inclined to go against popular opinion."
So are you saying popular opinion is always right?
And that definition fits you to a Tee..
You can't rely on an opinion from someone who is a self identified contrarian. So if you're a self identified contrarian, your opinions should fall on deaf ears since we all know that your answers and opinions are biased and are meant to disrupt and cause conflict for the hell of it..
You're the boy who cried wolf.. Or in your case, cried Trump. You will take each topic and choose the most unpopular opinion or answer just to buck the system. So when you actually do (if ever) offer sound advice or an opinion, it will always be overlooked because of being a self identified contrarian..
You made your bed.. Now lay in it.
I said I'm sometimes a contrarian. Not always. But on the topic of Trump's latest indictment, I agree with nearly every mainstream media outlet and every legal scholar available to read (including Bob Barr and Jon Turley!) So that's not very contrarian of me, is it?
(06-14-2023, 10:52 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2023, 10:41 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]And that definition fits you to a Tee..
You can't rely on an opinion from someone who is a self identified contrarian. So if you're a self identified contrarian, your opinions should fall on deaf ears since we all know that your answers and opinions are biased and are meant to disrupt and cause conflict for the hell of it..
You're the boy who cried wolf.. Or in your case, cried Trump. You will take each topic and choose the most unpopular opinion or answer just to buck the system. So when you actually do (if ever) offer sound advice or an opinion, it will always be overlooked because of being a self identified contrarian..
You made your bed.. Now lay in it.
I said I'm sometimes a contrarian. Not always. But on the topic of Trump's latest indictment, I agree with nearly every mainstream media outlet and every legal scholar available to read (including Bob Barr and Jon Turley!) So that's not very contrarian of me, is it?
I don't care what you agree with or don't. And I'm 100% positive that I'm not alone on that sentiment.
(06-14-2023, 10:55 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2023, 10:52 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]I said I'm sometimes a contrarian. Not always. But on the topic of Trump's latest indictment, I agree with nearly every mainstream media outlet and every legal scholar available to read (including Bob Barr and Jon Turley!) So that's not very contrarian of me, is it?
I don't care what you agree with or don't. And I'm 100% positive that I'm not alone on that sentiment.
Being contrary is one thing.
Being mean is another.
You enjoy being mean. It's a big part of your identity. And you're not alone in that either.
In other contexts we would call it bullying.
(06-14-2023, 11:25 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (06-14-2023, 10:55 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]I don't care what you agree with or don't. And I'm 100% positive that I'm not alone on that sentiment.
Being contrary is one thing.
Being mean is another.
You enjoy being mean. It's a big part of your identity. And you're not alone in that either.
In other contexts we would call it bullying.
So I'm mean for calling you out on your bull [BLEEP]? lololol
If you think I'm being mean, you just don't know me.. You haven't seen mean, brudda. And you never will..
But what you will see, is someone who isn't afraid to speak their mind and call someone or something out that doesn't pass the sniff test.
Bullying lololol
Stop crying and grow thicker skin, snowflake..