I just heard on the radio that Hunter Biden is dropping his lawsuit over the laptop because he doesn’t have the money to pay for lawyers. Meaning the daddy access revenue stream has dried up.
(03-06-2025, 01:04 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]I just heard on the radio that Hunter Biden is dropping his lawsuit over the laptop because he doesn’t have the money to pay for lawyers. Meaning the daddy access revenue stream has dried up.
Here's the story to it Homebiscuit...... I say..... BOO HOO! His Ukrainian Kickback money has dried up.......... LOL
Hunter Biden ‘Finding It Difficult To Earn A Living’ Now That His Dad Is No Longer POTUS
Hunter Biden’s counsel argued that he is currently “finding it difficult to make a living” in a Wednesday legal filing seeking to dismiss a lawsuit the former president’s son brought against Garrett Ziegler, an ex-Trump White House aide who published the contents of Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop to the internet.
The details about Hunter Biden’s financial difficulties are included in a 19-page filing submitted by his attorneys in court explaining their client’s rationale for wanting to drop his suit against Ziegler, one of several lawsuits filed against critics who have published or aggressively covered the laptop’s contents and alleged Biden family influence peddling. Hunter Biden, as well as his family members and business associates, raked in millions of dollars from dealings with overseas oligarchs during the years Joe Biden served as vice president and in the lead up to his 2020 presidential run, but the flow of cash seems to have dried up for the former president’s son.
Hunter Biden ‘Finding It Difficult To Earn A Living’ Now That His Dad Is No Longer POTUS
(03-06-2025, 01:09 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ] (03-06-2025, 01:04 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]I just heard on the radio that Hunter Biden is dropping his lawsuit over the laptop because he doesn’t have the money to pay for lawyers. Meaning the daddy access revenue stream has dried up.
Here's the story to it Homebiscuit...... I say..... BOO HOO! His Ukrainian Kickback money has dried up.......... LOL
Hunter Biden ‘Finding It Difficult To Earn A Living’ Now That His Dad Is No Longer POTUS
Hunter Biden’s counsel argued that he is currently “finding it difficult to make a living” in a Wednesday legal filing seeking to dismiss a lawsuit the former president’s son brought against Garrett Ziegler, an ex-Trump White House aide who published the contents of Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop to the internet.
The details about Hunter Biden’s financial difficulties are included in a 19-page filing submitted by his attorneys in court explaining their client’s rationale for wanting to drop his suit against Ziegler, one of several lawsuits filed against critics who have published or aggressively covered the laptop’s contents and alleged Biden family influence peddling. Hunter Biden, as well as his family members and business associates, raked in millions of dollars from dealings with overseas oligarchs during the years Joe Biden served as vice president and in the lead up to his 2020 presidential run, but the flow of cash seems to have dried up for the former president’s son.
Hunter Biden ‘Finding It Difficult To Earn A Living’ Now That His Dad Is No Longer POTUS
What?? His “art” isn’t making him wealthy and famous?
.gif "Laughing")
I'm unsure why Doofy isn't in here telling us how this is all Trump's fault and he's a traitor and persecuting little Hunter is making us the laughing stock of the world.
(03-06-2025, 11:27 AM)TDOSS Wrote: [ -> ] (03-06-2025, 11:02 AM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]Democrats marched for violent criminals like George Floyd but stayed seated for the black cancer survivor.
Says a lot about who they are.
Of course you want Mr Floyd criminal released just like a goood MAGA would.
MAGA members tend to be KKK members or affiliated with other hate groups.
People like you would vote for a ham sandwich if it promised segregated schools.
Oh Doof, you know that Floyd died because he overdosed on illegal fentanyl. You'd support people like Kammie Harris and Al Green if it meant you could pay more in taxes, give more of your rights to the government, and continue to chickenhawk the war you so adamantly demand of other people.
(03-06-2025, 12:59 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-06-2025, 12:53 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]How many members does the Whig party have?
PS, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:D...ted_States
Minor parties come and go.
Once a party is entrenched as a major party, meaning a party that fields one of the top two candidates for President, it stays in power. The Whigs are the one and only example of a major party that died. They died in 1856 when a new party, the Republican party, suddenly became the 2nd place party in the Presidential election and shoved the Whigs to third place.
Two things should be noted about this.
One, the Republican party was made up of people who defected from either of the two previous major parties - mostly from the Whig party. Abe Lincoln had been a Whig. So in a sense the Whig party destroyed itself, it wasn't defeated by its opponent, the Democrats.
Two, these forces that caused enough people to defect from the Whig Party and join the Republican Party so that the Whig party became minor and the Republican party became major, were the same forces that started the Civil War just 4 years later.
So the lessons are, the Republican party can't destroy the Democratic party, and even if other factors can cause the Democratic party to destroy itself, we should very much not wish for that, because a lot of social turmoil would go along with that.
The same lesson applies to Democrats who dream of destroying the Republican party.
The fact is, the Democrats under Obama watched the Republican party destroy itself as it became a party that had no unifying beliefs of its own other than opposition to Obama. That party had low turnout and low enthusiasm and was then vulnerable to takeover by Trump, a takeover that reversed many of its core values and made it much stronger than it had been.
(03-06-2025, 01:09 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ] (03-06-2025, 01:04 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]I just heard on the radio that Hunter Biden is dropping his lawsuit over the laptop because he doesn’t have the money to pay for lawyers. Meaning the daddy access revenue stream has dried up.
Here's the story to it Homebiscuit...... I say..... BOO HOO! His Ukrainian Kickback money has dried up.......... LOL
Hunter Biden ‘Finding It Difficult To Earn A Living’ Now That His Dad Is No Longer POTUS
Hunter Biden’s counsel argued that he is currently “finding it difficult to make a living” in a Wednesday legal filing seeking to dismiss a lawsuit the former president’s son brought against Garrett Ziegler, an ex-Trump White House aide who published the contents of Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop to the internet.
The details about Hunter Biden’s financial difficulties are included in a 19-page filing submitted by his attorneys in court explaining their client’s rationale for wanting to drop his suit against Ziegler, one of several lawsuits filed against critics who have published or aggressively covered the laptop’s contents and alleged Biden family influence peddling. Hunter Biden, as well as his family members and business associates, raked in millions of dollars from dealings with overseas oligarchs during the years Joe Biden served as vice president and in the lead up to his 2020 presidential run, but the flow of cash seems to have dried up for the former president’s son.
Hunter Biden ‘Finding It Difficult To Earn A Living’ Now That His Dad Is No Longer POTUS
How long before he starts to crush and snort up Daddy's dementia pills?
(03-06-2025, 01:50 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-06-2025, 12:59 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]PS, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:D...ted_States
Minor parties come and go.
Once a party is entrenched as a major party, meaning a party that fields one of the top two candidates for President, it stays in power. The Whigs are the one and only example of a major party that died. They died in 1856 when a new party, the Republican party, suddenly became the 2nd place party in the Presidential election and shoved the Whigs to third place.
Two things should be noted about this.
One, the Republican party was made up of people who defected from either of the two previous major parties - mostly from the Whig party. Abe Lincoln had been a Whig. So in a sense the Whig party destroyed itself, it wasn't defeated by its opponent, the Democrats.
Two, these forces that caused enough people to defect from the Whig Party and join the Republican Party so that the Whig party became minor and the Republican party became major, were the same forces that started the Civil War just 4 years later.
So the lessons are, the Republican party can't destroy the Democratic party, and even if other factors can cause the Democratic party to destroy itself, we should very much not wish for that, because a lot of social turmoil would go along with that.
The same lesson applies to Democrats who dream of destroying the Republican party.
The fact is, the Democrats under Obama watched the Republican party destroy itself as it became a party that had no unifying beliefs of its own other than opposition to Obama. That party had low turnout and low enthusiasm and was then vulnerable to takeover by Trump, a takeover that reversed many of its core values and made it much stronger than it had been.
ok, so your post that said "
In America parties never die but they do switch sides." was incorrect? That is an absolute statement.
I know you have an opinion on the whig party's evolution, that is nice. However it does not exist today and is defunct as members left it. Just like all these others.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:D...ted_States
The bold statement sounds pretty relevant today, just not the Republicans.
Liberals in a nutshell.......
![[Image: 481258517-1129994929174724-4842351814781495011-n.jpg]](https://i.ibb.co/pj6r5SW0/481258517-1129994929174724-4842351814781495011-n.jpg)
(03-06-2025, 02:24 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-06-2025, 01:50 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Minor parties come and go.
Once a party is entrenched as a major party, meaning a party that fields one of the top two candidates for President, it stays in power. The Whigs are the one and only example of a major party that died. They died in 1856 when a new party, the Republican party, suddenly became the 2nd place party in the Presidential election and shoved the Whigs to third place.
Two things should be noted about this.
One, the Republican party was made up of people who defected from either of the two previous major parties - mostly from the Whig party. Abe Lincoln had been a Whig. So in a sense the Whig party destroyed itself, it wasn't defeated by its opponent, the Democrats.
Two, these forces that caused enough people to defect from the Whig Party and join the Republican Party so that the Whig party became minor and the Republican party became major, were the same forces that started the Civil War just 4 years later.
So the lessons are, the Republican party can't destroy the Democratic party, and even if other factors can cause the Democratic party to destroy itself, we should very much not wish for that, because a lot of social turmoil would go along with that.
The same lesson applies to Democrats who dream of destroying the Republican party.
The fact is, the Democrats under Obama watched the Republican party destroy itself as it became a party that had no unifying beliefs of its own other than opposition to Obama. That party had low turnout and low enthusiasm and was then vulnerable to takeover by Trump, a takeover that reversed many of its core values and made it much stronger than it had been.
ok, so your post that said "In America parties never die but they do switch sides." was incorrect? That is an absolute statement.
I know you have an opinion on the whig party's evolution, that is nice. However it does not exist today and is defunct as members left it. Just like all these others.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:D...ted_States
The bold statement sounds pretty relevant today, just not the Republicans.
The bolded statement is relevant for both parties. More relevant for Democrats than Republicans, but still relevant for both. The Reagan Republicans lost their connection with their voters and the party basically got a soft reset under Trump. It didn't die the same way the Whig party died, but it did get whacked hard. It lost the popular vote for President 4 times in a row and 7 out of 8 times going back to 1992. Though they won the electoral college 3 times, they only got more popular votes than the Democrats once from 1992 to 2020. Today's Democrats aren't that bad off yet, but it might not be long.
I still think the DeWayne "The Rock" Johnson is going to swoop in and take the Democrats over. You're welcome!
(03-06-2025, 08:35 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-06-2025, 02:24 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]ok, so your post that said "In America parties never die but they do switch sides." was incorrect? That is an absolute statement.
I know you have an opinion on the whig party's evolution, that is nice. However it does not exist today and is defunct as members left it. Just like all these others.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:D...ted_States
The bold statement sounds pretty relevant today, just not the Republicans.
The bolded statement is relevant for both parties. More relevant for Democrats than Republicans, but still relevant for both. The Reagan Republicans lost their connection with their voters and the party basically got a soft reset under Trump. It didn't die the same way the Whig party died, but it did get whacked hard. It lost the popular vote for President 4 times in a row and 7 out of 8 times going back to 1992. Though they won the electoral college 3 times, they only got more popular votes than the Democrats once from 1992 to 2020. Today's Democrats aren't that bad off yet, but it might not be long.
I still think the DeWayne "The Rock" Johnson is going to swoop in and take the Democrats over. You're welcome!
LOL ... He will have to arm wrestle both Newsome of the double tongue and AOC, best bartender on Capitol Hill for it. He should take em both as long as he wears a cup during the AOC match. At least it will be entertaining.
(03-06-2025, 01:09 PM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ] (03-06-2025, 01:04 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]I just heard on the radio that Hunter Biden is dropping his lawsuit over the laptop because he doesn’t have the money to pay for lawyers. Meaning the daddy access revenue stream has dried up.
Here's the story to it Homebiscuit...... I say..... BOO HOO! His Ukrainian Kickback money has dried up.......... LOL
Hunter Biden ‘Finding It Difficult To Earn A Living’ Now That His Dad Is No Longer POTUS
Hunter Biden’s counsel argued that he is currently “finding it difficult to make a living” in a Wednesday legal filing seeking to dismiss a lawsuit the former president’s son brought against Garrett Ziegler, an ex-Trump White House aide who published the contents of Hunter Biden’s infamous laptop to the internet.
The details about Hunter Biden’s financial difficulties are included in a 19-page filing submitted by his attorneys in court explaining their client’s rationale for wanting to drop his suit against Ziegler, one of several lawsuits filed against critics who have published or aggressively covered the laptop’s contents and alleged Biden family influence peddling. Hunter Biden, as well as his family members and business associates, raked in millions of dollars from dealings with overseas oligarchs during the years Joe Biden served as vice president and in the lead up to his 2020 presidential run, but the flow of cash seems to have dried up for the former president’s son.
Hunter Biden ‘Finding It Difficult To Earn A Living’ Now That His Dad Is No Longer POTUS
They made the molecules woke! Quick, Drifter, we need you to get the word out on Truth Social. The leftist filth have created woke molecules. Please do whatever you deem necessary to get the word out to Donald and Stephen Miller ASAP.
As someone said in the comments, this guy is equally afraid of Islamists and his own government. We just have bat [BLEEP] crazy lefties to deal with here. Britain has created its own brand of hell.
https://youtu.be/lYrw9C79M1c?si=rgnH76knTScZWY0h
The wins keep rolling.. Now deport those [BLEEP]!!
FAFO
https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1898055...zMHYQ&s=19
JUST IN: Trump Admin cuts $400M in federal funding to Columbia University, citing failure to address antisemitism on campus, per The Free Press. Major blow to the Ivy League school.
Interesting development here.... which has a good chance of being proven correct........
State AG Sets Stage to Have All Biden Pardons, Exec Orders, Other Actions Legally Voided
Missouri’s attorney general wants to know what former President Joe Biden didn’t know and for how long he didn’t know it.
In a post on X, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey said he wants the Department of Justice to open up a can of worms by investigating whether Biden’s deluge of executive orders and pardons that marked the final weeks of his presidency came at a time when Biden had no idea what he was signing.
“I am demanding the DOJ [investigate] whether President Biden’s cognitive decline allowed unelected staff to push through radical policy without his knowing approval,” Baily posted. wrote. “If true, these executive orders, pardons, and all other actions are unconstitutional and legally void.”
https://www.westernjournal.com/state-ag-...ent=square
(03-07-2025, 08:17 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Two leakers about ICE raids face prosecution.
https://nypost.com/2025/03/07/us-news/tw...noem-says/
Important to note it is not illegal for an ordinary citizen or reporter to report true stories about raids or planned raids.
It is illegal for government employees to do so. Part of their terms of employment.
(03-09-2025, 10:54 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2025, 08:17 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Two leakers about ICE raids face prosecution.
https://nypost.com/2025/03/07/us-news/tw...noem-says/
Important to note it is not illegal for an ordinary citizen or reporter to report true stories about raids or planned raids.
It is illegal for government employees to do so. Part of their terms of employment.
It's also important to note that both leakers, as clearly stated in the article, are suspected of being within the ranks of the FBI.
(03-09-2025, 11:02 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ] (03-09-2025, 10:54 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Important to note it is not illegal for an ordinary citizen or reporter to report true stories about raids or planned raids.
It is illegal for government employees to do so. Part of their terms of employment.
It's also important to note that both leakers, as clearly stated in the article, are suspected of being within the ranks of the FBI.
If they did the time they will pay the time. Watch and see how it plays out. I would suggest EVERY department is currently identifying leakers that may be on staff.