Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Let's Talk About- Political Edition
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623
(08-31-2022, 05:09 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]This is why the Space Force was created. 

Opinion | A shadow war in space is heating up fast - The Washington Post

While Washington officials and experts warn of the risks of an arms race in space, the United States’ adversaries are constantly conducting operations against U.S. satellites that skirt the line between intelligence operations and acts of war. The pace of conflict is intensifying, according to a top Space Force general, who told me that China could overtake the United States to become the number one power in space by the end of the decade.

“The threats are really growing and expanding every single day. And it’s really an evolution of activity that’s been happening for a long time,” Gen. David Thompson, the Space Force’s first vice chief of space operations, told me in an interview on the sidelines of the recent Halifax International Security Forum. “We’re really at a point now where there’s a whole host of ways that our space systems can be threatened.”

Right now, Space Force is dealing with what Thompson calls “reversible attacks” on U.S. government satellites (meaning attacks that don’t permanently damage the satellites) “every single day.” Both China and Russia are regularly attacking U.S. satellites with non-kinetic means, including lasers, radio frequency jammers and cyber attacks, he said.

Thompson repeatedly declined to comment on whether China or Russia has attacked a U.S. military satellite in a way that did permanent or significant damage, telling me that would be classified if it had happened. The Chinese military is quickly deploying ground-based systems for doing battle in space, such as lasers that can damage nosy U.S. intelligence community satellites, which could be considered an act of war.

“The Chinese are actually well ahead [of Russia],” Thompson said. “They're fielding operational systems at an incredible rate.”

Both the Russians and the Chinese are working on satellites that can attack other satellites, he said. For some time now there have been reports that China was developing a satellite that could claw another satellite or grab one with a robotic arm or a grappling hook. The Chinese government has several reasons to want to disable U.S. satellites, which have been useful in revealing concentration camps built to intern Uyghur Muslims and new Chinese nuclear missile silo fields...

Conventional thinking about how to deter an enemy from attacking on the ground, by sea or in the air doesn’t really apply to space. New doctrines and norms for space need to be established, mostly by diplomats. That work will take years. Meanwhile, the arms race in space is heating up, and the United States risks losing it if it doesn’t recognize this reality.

You're reading the Washington Post!   

No, seriously, the article makes an excellent point.  Let's hope our government isn't asleep at the switch.  We should be leading the world in this kind of technology.
77 years ago, Japan surrendered to the allied forces effectively ending WWII. #VJDay
(09-02-2022, 01:21 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Holy cow!

Cristina Fernández de Kirchner: Gun jams during bid to kill Argentina vice-president - BBC News

https://twitter.com/LautaroMaislin/statu...a-62762421

I don't know much about Argentine politics, but this guy sounds like a Liberal Socialist. Which I guess is a little better than the Communist (mostly) that Peru elected. Political apathy is so rampant in South America that the guy from the Dos Equis commercials could run in any of the countries and he would probably win in a landslide.
When science writing bows to woke-ism. The point being that radiation thresholds for each sex is different, regardless of the astronaut's gender identity. Rather than qualify the radiation requirements statement with an explanation of intrinsic differences in each sex and radiation exposure, she chose to use the less subjective term of gender. The immutable laws of physics have been nudged aside as a nod to genderism. Gender identities (disclosures) have absolutely nothing to do with radiation exposure limits. This is either lazy writing or a low-grade attempt at activism.  

Astronauts' blood shows signs of DNA mutations due to spaceflight | Space 

Astronaut cancer risk needs careful monitoring, concludes a study that stored spaceflyer blood for 20 years.

All fourteen astronauts in the study, from NASA's space shuttle program, had DNA mutations in blood-forming stem cells, a Nature Communications Biology study(opens in new tab) Aug. 31 concluded. The mutations, though unusually high considering the astronauts' age, was below a key threshold of concern, however.

While the study is unique for keeping astronaut blood around for so long, the results are not show-stopping. Rather, the researchers suggest that astronauts should be subject to periodic blood screening to keep an eye on possible mutations. (And it should be considered in context; another 2019 study, for example, found that astronauts are not dying from cancer due to ionizing space radiation.)...

NASA recently changed its lifetime radiation requirements for astronauts that critics said were discriminating against women, who historically had lower limits than male astronauts. (To date, other genders have not been disclosed in the agency population.)...
This is funny I don't care who you are.........

[Image: tesla.jpg]
(09-07-2022, 10:25 AM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]This is funny I don't care who you are.........

[Image: tesla.jpg]
Unfortunately it would take more than 12 hours and the same or more gas than just driving a car to car it up with the generator.

Should start a business adding a motor to them so you can trick California and still drive places. That is until they ban all gas sells in the state.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
(09-07-2022, 07:56 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-07-2022, 10:25 AM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]This is funny I don't care who you are.........

[Image: tesla.jpg]
Unfortunately it would take more than 12 hours and the same or more gas than just driving a car to car it up with the generator.

Should start a business adding a motor to them so you can trick California and still drive places. That is until they ban all gas sells in the state.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk
Give it time. We may not even have to hold our breath.  Sad but true.
(09-09-2022, 11:52 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]lolololol

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q0qTlBst_8c

Disinformation! 

Sweet.

Of course Newsweek comes out with a scathing critique. I wonder if they did the same for the movies about Trump?

I love that Gina Carano is in the movie. She was canceled by Hollywood for voicing an opinion that didn’t agree with their lockstep view.

https://www.newsweek.com/my-son-hunter-a...ts-1741041
(09-09-2022, 12:15 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-09-2022, 11:52 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]lolololol

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q0qTlBst_8c

Disinformation! 

Sweet.

Of course Newsweek comes out with a scathing critique. I wonder if they did the same for the movies about Trump?

I love that Gina Carano is in the movie. She was canceled by Hollywood for voicing an opinion that didn’t agree with their lockstep view.

https://www.newsweek.com/my-son-hunter-a...ts-1741041

Wait this is a real movie?
(09-09-2022, 12:30 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-09-2022, 12:15 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Disinformation! 

Sweet.

Of course Newsweek comes out with a scathing critique. I wonder if they did the same for the movies about Trump?

I love that Gina Carano is in the movie. She was canceled by Hollywood for voicing an opinion that didn’t agree with their lockstep view.

https://www.newsweek.com/my-son-hunter-a...ts-1741041

Wait this is a real movie?

Yup..
(09-09-2022, 12:30 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-09-2022, 12:15 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Disinformation! 

Sweet.

Of course Newsweek comes out with a scathing critique. I wonder if they did the same for the movies about Trump?

I love that Gina Carano is in the movie. She was canceled by Hollywood for voicing an opinion that didn’t agree with their lockstep view.

https://www.newsweek.com/my-son-hunter-a...ts-1741041

Wait this is a real movie?
Breitbart produced it but I'm not sure what the point or style is. They look to be making it too crazy that people will just laugh it off. It's supposed to be using the info off the laptop and other sources. The previews appears to just take it across the line. It's not far from the truth but the acting will just make it too sensationalized.

I'm hoping it more of a documentary instead of being done mocking it.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
(09-09-2022, 11:52 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]lolololol

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q0qTlBst_8c

What the actual [BLEEP]???
(09-12-2022, 04:55 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-09-2022, 11:52 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]lolololol

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q0qTlBst_8c

What the actual [BLEEP]???

Tell me that doesn't look good though lolol

If it wasn't for Top Gun, Hunter could clean up at the Oscars lolol
(09-12-2022, 04:55 PM)Bchbunnie4 Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-09-2022, 11:52 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]lolololol

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q0qTlBst_8c

What the actual [BLEEP]???

It has the sleezy feel of a porn.
So, inflation is at 8.3% and Biden wants to celebrate. The media ask the press secretary what there is to celebrate about with inflation sticking around and the markets going nuts. She mentions the inflation reduction act and tells people to go to a website that lists how people can save money. 

By learning how to:
-get a tax credit on an EV.
-buy an efficient heat pump and other appliances 
-buy efficient insulation 

And more but I don't remember what all she said. 

Are these people dumb or just plain stupid? Our heat pump works just fine. Not super efficient compared to today's standards but it works. My truck and hubby's car are paid for and work just fine. I would love to have better insulation but not at the expense of buying it and the drywall, tape, mud and paint to replace what we would have to tear out. 

People don't have the money to drop thousands of dollars on EVs, heat pumps, etc., especially when they are struggling to pay their light bill. We won't spend it until we have to. Until then we keep putting money in savings so we can spend it when the time comes. We just bought a new fridge a few months ago only because the old one was literally dying. 

This "act" is pretty worthless.
(09-13-2022, 07:02 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]So, inflation is at 8.3% and Biden wants to celebrate. The media ask the press secretary what there is to celebrate about with inflation sticking around and the markets going nuts. She mentions the inflation reduction act and tells people to go to a website that lists how people can save money. 

By learning how to:
-get a tax credit on an EV.
-buy an efficient heat pump and other appliances 
-buy efficient insulation 

And more but I don't remember what all she said. 

Are these people dumb or just plain stupid? Our heat pump works just fine. Not super efficient compared to today's standards but it works. My truck and hubby's car are paid for and work just fine. I would love to have better insulation but not at the expense of buying it and the drywall, tape, mud and paint to replace what we would have to tear out. 

People don't have the money to drop thousands of dollars on EVs, heat pumps, etc., especially when they are struggling to pay their light bill. We won't spend it until we have to. Until then we keep putting money in savings so we can spend it when the time comes. We just bought a new fridge a few months ago only because the old one was literally dying. 

This "act" is pretty worthless.

If you have an attic, you could upgrade the insulation there without racking up too many other costs. Im pretty sure you own your home.
Rent has been going up fadter than overall inflation, at least here.

Do you see many EVs where you live? I'm seeing more and more.

But yeah. I kind of wish Biden would tell it to us straight and admit that most people's income is not keeping up with inflation. Admit that this is a belt tightening period for a lot of the necessities of life. I feel like Americans can accept that. We accepted it when Carter said so (Carter lost due to Iran hostage crisis, and Reagan's charisma, not inflation. Inflation went even higher after Reagan was elected but voters didn't react) The Japanese have accepted that message for nearly 30 years now. Americans can be tough like that, if our leaders tell us we are that tough. But our leaders (since Carter) treat us like softies. Its probably too late for Biden to change tack.
(09-13-2022, 07:02 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]So, inflation is at 8.3% and Biden wants to celebrate. The media ask the press secretary what there is to celebrate about with inflation sticking around and the markets going nuts. She mentions the inflation reduction act and tells people to go to a website that lists how people can save money. 

By learning how to:
-get a tax credit on an EV.
-buy an efficient heat pump and other appliances 
-buy efficient insulation 

And more but I don't remember what all she said. 

Are these people dumb or just plain stupid? Our heat pump works just fine. Not super efficient compared to today's standards but it works. My truck and hubby's car are paid for and work just fine. I would love to have better insulation but not at the expense of buying it and the drywall, tape, mud and paint to replace what we would have to tear out. 

People don't have the money to drop thousands of dollars on EVs, heat pumps, etc., especially when they are struggling to pay their light bill. We won't spend it until we have to. Until then we keep putting money in savings so we can spend it when the time comes. We just bought a new fridge a few months ago only because the old one was literally dying. 

This "act" is pretty worthless.

Those [BLEEP] morons don't know how to do anything except spend money they don't have, why would their advice say to do anything different?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623