Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Let's Talk About- Political Edition
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623
(10-04-2023, 07:32 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 07:22 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Sorry, I should have been more clear.  What I meant was, "QAnon," although it was based on pure fiction, did have a lot of believers.  That's why I say, if "Red Caesarism" rises to the level of QAnon, then it is a real thing that is kind of interesting, the way QAnon was interesting.  And that's why I'd like to know if Red Caesarism has any traction in the public sphere, and if anyone else has ever heard of it.

Okay. However, I don’t think it had a lot of believers but the media built up a narrative that it did because it benefited their candidate. 

If Red Caesarism gains any traction in the public discourse over the next few months is because the MSM is building another narrative to help their party. 

It really is that simple.

There are a lot of polls that show a lot of people believe in the QAnon conspiracy theory.

QAnon Conspiracies Sway Faith Groups, Including 1 in 4 Whi...... | News & Reporting | Christianity Today
(10-04-2023, 07:48 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 07:32 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Okay. However, I don’t think it had a lot of believers but the media built up a narrative that it did because it benefited their candidate. 

If Red Caesarism gains any traction in the public discourse over the next few months is because the MSM is building another narrative to help their party. 

It really is that simple.

There are a lot of polls that show a lot of people believe in the QAnon conspiracy theory.

QAnon Conspiracies Sway Faith Groups, Including 1 in 4 Whi...... | News & Reporting | Christianity Today

“A new survey reports more than a quarter of white evangelical Protestants…”

This couldn’t be more targeted if they claimed it was left handed Peugeot drivers born in months that end in y.

I understand your point but the fact of the matter is the MSM attempted to paint a narrative that QAnon was a guiding force of the right. It was a looney conspiracy theory regarded as just that by a wide majority of Republicans.
(10-04-2023, 08:01 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 07:48 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]There are a lot of polls that show a lot of people believe in the QAnon conspiracy theory.

QAnon Conspiracies Sway Faith Groups, Including 1 in 4 Whi...... | News & Reporting | Christianity Today

“A new survey reports more than a quarter of white evangelical Protestants…”

This couldn’t be more targeted if they claimed it was left handed Peugeot drivers born in months that end in y.

I understand your point but the fact of the matter is the MSM attempted to paint a narrative that QAnon was a guiding force of the right. It was a looney conspiracy theory regarded as just that by a wide majority of Republicans.

Okay, I think we're going down the message board rabbit hole of arguing smaller and smaller points, but I really just want to know if anyone on this message board has heard of "Red Caesarism."
I think Q was more common than you're giving it credit, HB. Unfortunately, it's textbook cognitive dissonance. There are a lot on the right who had extreme faith in the American government, and they just couldn't reconcile how corrupt it has become, so they became perfect rubes for some trolls to convince them the government had a plan. It's not widespread among the right, but it did gain pretty good traction. However, using those people as a symbol of anything resembling the right is disingenuous. It's more sad than malicious, and, once again, it's the result of a government that's failing us, not their "stupidity."

(10-04-2023, 08:27 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 08:01 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]“A new survey reports more than a quarter of white evangelical Protestants…”

This couldn’t be more targeted if they claimed it was left handed Peugeot drivers born in months that end in y.

I understand your point but the fact of the matter is the MSM attempted to paint a narrative that QAnon was a guiding force of the right. It was a looney conspiracy theory regarded as just that by a wide majority of Republicans.

Okay, I think we're going down the message board rabbit hole of arguing smaller and smaller points, but I really just want to know if anyone on this message board has heard of "Red Caesarism."

No. They haven't. Much like every other media driven narrative that's proceeded it. I'm sure we'll be talking about it in 6 months, though. 

I said this years ago, btw. The rise of the extreme left is going to produce the extreme right. Fascism was an answer to communism. The right will have to use the power of the state to defeat the power of the state. That's how it's always happened in history. So, "Red Caesarism" or whatever they want to call it, was always going to happen.
(10-04-2023, 08:29 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]I think Q was more common than you're giving it credit, HB. Unfortunately, it's textbook cognitive dissonance. There are a lot on the right who had extreme faith in the American government, and they just couldn't reconcile how corrupt it has become, so they became perfect rubes for some trolls to convince them the government had a plan. It's not widespread among the right, but it did gain pretty good traction. However, using those people as a symbol of anything resembling the right is disingenuous. It's more sad than malicious, and, once again, it's the result of a government that's failing us, not their "stupidity."

(10-04-2023, 08:27 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]Okay, I think we're going down the message board rabbit hole of arguing smaller and smaller points, but I really just want to know if anyone on this message board has heard of "Red Caesarism."

No. They haven't. Much like every other media driven narrative that's proceeded it. I'm sure we'll be talking about it in 6 months, though. 

I said this years ago, btw. The rise of the extreme left is going to produce the extreme right. Fascism was an answer to communism. The right will have to use the power of the state to defeat the power of the state. That's how it's always happened in history. So, "Red Caesarism" or whatever they want to call it, was always going to happen.

So if the right gets enough control of the power of the state to defeat the power of the state, what do they do with the power of the state after they have defeated it?  Do you think the right will then give up the power of the state willingly?  You say that's how it's always happened in history, but I can't think of an instance where fascism rose in response to communism and then the fascists gave up power.  Spanish Civil War for example, or Germany in the 1930s.  Fascists took the power of the state and expanded it.

And as for the phrase, "how corrupt it has become," the US government is no more corrupt now than it has been in the past.  I'm not saying it's not corrupt, I'm saying it has always been that way.
(10-04-2023, 08:27 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 08:01 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]“A new survey reports more than a quarter of white evangelical Protestants…”

This couldn’t be more targeted if they claimed it was left handed Peugeot drivers born in months that end in y.

I understand your point but the fact of the matter is the MSM attempted to paint a narrative that QAnon was a guiding force of the right. It was a looney conspiracy theory regarded as just that by a wide majority of Republicans.

Okay, I think we're going down the message board rabbit hole of arguing smaller and smaller points, but I really just want to know if anyone on this message board has heard of "Red Caesarism."

Agreed. I’ll get off my Q horse.

Now on to Caesar!

[Image: giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7tl7kn8bafvsbv3wy2i...y.gif&ct=g]
(10-04-2023, 08:39 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 08:29 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]I think Q was more common than you're giving it credit, HB. Unfortunately, it's textbook cognitive dissonance. There are a lot on the right who had extreme faith in the American government, and they just couldn't reconcile how corrupt it has become, so they became perfect rubes for some trolls to convince them the government had a plan. It's not widespread among the right, but it did gain pretty good traction. However, using those people as a symbol of anything resembling the right is disingenuous. It's more sad than malicious, and, once again, it's the result of a government that's failing us, not their "stupidity."


No. They haven't. Much like every other media driven narrative that's proceeded it. I'm sure we'll be talking about it in 6 months, though. 

I said this years ago, btw. The rise of the extreme left is going to produce the extreme right. Fascism was an answer to communism. The right will have to use the power of the state to defeat the power of the state. That's how it's always happened in history. So, "Red Caesarism" or whatever they want to call it, was always going to happen.

So if the right gets enough control of the power of the state to defeat the power of the state, what do they do with the power of the state after they have defeated it?  Do you think the right will then give up the power of the state willingly?  You say that's how it's always happened in history, but I can't think of an instance where fascism rose in response to communism and then the fascists gave up power.  Spanish Civil War for example, or Germany in the 1930s.  Fascists took the power of the state and expanded it.

And as for the phrase, "how corrupt it has become," the US government is no more corrupt now than it has been in the past.  I'm not saying it's not corrupt, I'm saying it has always been that way.

Mr. Smith Goes to Washington was made in 1939 and it is as true today as it was then.
https://twitter.com/FFT1776/status/17095...3HyMw&s=19

lolololololol

Yes please!! lolololol
(10-04-2023, 09:25 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/FFT1776/status/17095...3HyMw&s=19

lolololololol

Yes please!! lolololol

Since that is an actual job with actual duties, he may want to re-think that.
(10-04-2023, 08:39 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 08:29 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]I think Q was more common than you're giving it credit, HB. Unfortunately, it's textbook cognitive dissonance. There are a lot on the right who had extreme faith in the American government, and they just couldn't reconcile how corrupt it has become, so they became perfect rubes for some trolls to convince them the government had a plan. It's not widespread among the right, but it did gain pretty good traction. However, using those people as a symbol of anything resembling the right is disingenuous. It's more sad than malicious, and, once again, it's the result of a government that's failing us, not their "stupidity."


No. They haven't. Much like every other media driven narrative that's proceeded it. I'm sure we'll be talking about it in 6 months, though. 

I said this years ago, btw. The rise of the extreme left is going to produce the extreme right. Fascism was an answer to communism. The right will have to use the power of the state to defeat the power of the state. That's how it's always happened in history. So, "Red Caesarism" or whatever they want to call it, was always going to happen.

So if the right gets enough control of the power of the state to defeat the power of the state, what do they do with the power of the state after they have defeated it?  Do you think the right will then give up the power of the state willingly?  You say that's how it's always happened in history, but I can't think of an instance where fascism rose in response to communism and then the fascists gave up power.  Spanish Civil War for example, or Germany in the 1930s.  Fascists took the power of the state and expanded it.

And as for the phrase, "how corrupt it has become," the US government is no more corrupt now than it has been in the past.  I'm not saying it's not corrupt, I'm saying it has always been that way.

Did I say the fascists gave up power?
(10-04-2023, 09:31 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 08:39 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]So if the right gets enough control of the power of the state to defeat the power of the state, what do they do with the power of the state after they have defeated it?  Do you think the right will then give up the power of the state willingly?  You say that's how it's always happened in history, but I can't think of an instance where fascism rose in response to communism and then the fascists gave up power.  Spanish Civil War for example, or Germany in the 1930s.  Fascists took the power of the state and expanded it.

And as for the phrase, "how corrupt it has become," the US government is no more corrupt now than it has been in the past.  I'm not saying it's not corrupt, I'm saying it has always been that way.

Did I say the fascists gave up power?

No, you didn't.  But you did say, "The right will have to use the power of the state to defeat the power of the state."  

In order to use the power of the state, first they have to take control of the power of the state.  Are you saying they would want to defeat the power that they control?  It's never happened in all of history that the right, or the left for that matter, has taken control of the power of the state and then gotten rid of it.  What they usually do is expand it.  

It's like saying, "We need to blow up that house and in order to do that, first we have to occupy it."  But once you occupy the house, why do you want to blow it up with yourself in it?  
(10-04-2023, 09:27 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 09:25 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/FFT1776/status/17095...3HyMw&s=19

lolololololol

Yes please!! lolololol

Since that is an actual job with actual duties, he may want to re-think that.

Should have told that to McCarthy..
(10-04-2023, 09:41 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 09:31 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]Did I say the fascists gave up power?

No, you didn't.  But you did say, "The right will have to use the power of the state to defeat the power of the state."  

In order to use the power of the state, first they have to take control of the power of the state.  Are you saying they would want to defeat the power that they control?  It's never happened in all of history that the right, or the left for that matter, has taken control of the power of the state and then gotten rid of it.  What they usually do is expand it.  

It's like saying, "We need to blow up that house and in order to do that, first we have to occupy it."  But once you occupy the house, why do you want to blow it up with yourself in it?  

No. You're missing the point. If the power of the state is used by group y against group x, then group x must use the power of the state to defeat group y. It's the last measure before civil war. And, you are correct, once used the group doesn't give up power. 

The moderates have failed their responsibility to push back against the power of the left (and continue to do so), which means you're going to see an uprising on the right making calls to use the power of the state against the left. It's predictable. You shouldn't be alarmed by this. You should have been alarmed about 10 years ago.
(10-04-2023, 10:22 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1...qq3vA&s=19

You're so gullible.  I'll bet they interviewed 50 people, and showed the two who defended shoplifting.
https://twitter.com/RealJamesWoods/statu...fc6bQ&s=19

Boom

(10-04-2023, 10:31 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 10:22 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1...qq3vA&s=19

You're so gullible.  I'll bet they interviewed 50 people, and showed the two who defended shoplifting.

And you're stupid for believing that..
Welp, hats off to republicans.
After decades of trying, they finally ousted a house speaker.

And Matt Gaetz has now officially screwed someone over the age of 18, so, bonus!
(10-04-2023, 02:04 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]Welp, hats off to republicans.
After decades of trying, they finally ousted a house speaker.

And Matt Gaetz has now officially screwed someone over the age of 18, so, bonus!

[Image: giphy.gif?cid=2154d3d7yngsqnuszm7qwb6zwd...y.gif&ct=g]
(10-04-2023, 10:31 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2023, 10:22 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1...qq3vA&s=19

You're so gullible.  I'll bet they interviewed 50 people, and showed the two who defended shoplifting.

I'm sure the reporters interviewed however many people necessary to elicit the desired response.  That's what the media does, both on the left, and on the right.  Credibility (or lack thereof) in the media is a frustration we face every day.  Regardless, wouldn't you agree that any percentage greater than zero of those supporting these actions is too high, and this "woke" tolerance is undermining the social fabric of our country?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623