Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(06-10-2022, 11:44 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-10-2022, 08:37 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]They literally showed, last night, the timestamped sequenced videos of people pushing through barricades and breaking windows.
People weren't "let in" until a lot of violence had already taken place. 
The committee says they've identified the people who pushed through and broke windows.

There are documented timelines that show what happened and when. You need to go read them, they show the feds and antifa leading the efforts to get people inside. The barriers were removed that blocked the perimeter by fed, then he tries to get people to comes inside. Police could have stopped it but didn't. Then people start filling in, Police move backwards some. Goes on like this for a while. Then the cops remove other barriers to get more people to come up close.

The doors didn't even need to be opened. Nothing was going to happen, just look at all the other rallies for Trump. People weren't violent and didn't attack police. Nothing was destroyed in the building, everything was relatively calm. You saw the violence either coming from the cops and some people responding. The instigators also got involved and tried to create he reaction so it would blow up.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

Got links?

(06-11-2022, 09:31 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-10-2022, 11:44 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]There are documented timelines that show what happened and when. You need to go read them, they show the feds and antifa leading the efforts to get people inside. The barriers were removed that blocked the perimeter by fed, then he tries to get people to comes inside. Police could have stopped it but didn't. Then people start filling in, Police move backwards some. Goes on like this for a while. Then the cops remove other barriers to get more people to come up close.

The doors didn't even need to be opened. Nothing was going to happen, just look at all the other rallies for Trump. People weren't violent and didn't attack police. Nothing was destroyed in the building, everything was relatively calm. You saw the violence either coming from the cops and some people responding. The instigators also got involved and tried to create he reaction so it would blow up.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

Got links?

They were posted previously but you didn't look at them. There's a website that was covering all of it but I don't remember what it was. Gateway pundit actually had a few good articles, probably written by the people on the other site, going over all of it. You may be able to find it by searching there.

(06-13-2022, 07:41 PM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/grandoldmemes/status...yNwLA&s=19

They have the best lighting, makeup people, hair dressers, etc at that police station. He also was looking up at the camera. No way that was the real mugshot .... I know that one has Pelosi on but the "real" one has to be fake.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

(06-14-2022, 09:58 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]California pet store bans Second Amendment supporters from adopting animals, faces backlash | Fox News

The millions of weird and wacky people in the world plus the internet equals endless entertainment.

(06-14-2022, 09:58 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]California pet store bans Second Amendment supporters from adopting animals, faces backlash | Fox News

They will sue for fraud? LOL what absolute dumb [BLEEP]. They just told the whole world that they are unarmed. Criminals, come on down!

Edward B. Harmon: Media spread debunked smear about Gov. Ron DeSantis (gainesville.com)

Although her claims have been debunked, do not blame former Florida data scientist Rebekah Jones alone for her actions. That is far too simple an analysis. She merely followed the media’s Rule No. 1, which is that any well-timed smear against a prominent Republican will receive, with no real investigation, vast media approval and publicity.

Jones expected that her smear would receive the same type of publicity and adulation as did earlier applications of Rule #1 by the likes of Christopher Steele, author of the fictitious Steele dossier; Michael Avenatti; Michael Cohen and others to numerous to note. Jones was right. 

Jones’ timing was impeccable. It was July of 2020. The media and the Democrats were enthralled by New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and were searching for a way to destroy Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. DeSantis was, after all, in the midst of keeping Florida schools and businesses open.

When Jones was fired by the Florida Department of Health, she alleged that she was fired in retaliation for refusing to falsify COVID data. That was a damning accusation, designed to smear DeSantis. The Democrats knew that attacking him for his record of job creation, low unemployment, keeping schools open and safe, low crime, low taxes and integrity would be a tough sell. A diversion from substantive issues would do and she provided one.


 A NPR story was headlined, “Florida Dismisses A Scientist For Her Refusal to Manipulate State’s Coronavirus Data.” From May 2020 to December 2020, Jones made at least nine separate appearances on CNN. CNN star Chris Cuomo had her as a guest five times.

Outlets such as MSNBC, the Miami Herald, the Washington Post and NBC News helped build Jones’ image. She received a rapturous profile in Cosmopolitan headlined, "Rebekah Jones Tried to Warn Us About COVID-19. Now Her Freedom Is on the Line." Fortune Magazine recognized her as one of their “40 under 40” notables. Forbes named her “Technology Person of the Year.” ...


DeSantis took the right and ethical action and referred Jones' complaint to the Florida Department of Health's Office of the Inspector General, which conducted an investigation of the facts and circumstances. The office issued a report, dated March 9, which will receive as much coverage in the liberal media as the attempt to murder Justice Brett Kavanaugh or the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop.

As to allegations that she was directed or pressured to falsify COVID positivity rates, the allegations were found to be “unsubstantiated.” Her allegation that the calculation of new case positivity was misrepresented was found to have “not occurred.” As to the allegation that Jones was restricted in access to underling data that supported what appeared on the dashboard, the defendants were “exonerated.”

However, Jones' moment in the sun is not done — far, far from it, and this is hilarious. She has announced that she is running for Congress against Rep. Matt Gaetz...

(06-15-2022, 12:08 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]However, Jones' moment in the sun is not done — far, far from it, and this is hilarious. She has announced that she is running for Congress against Rep. Matt Gaetz...

Haha, must have some funds she needs to launder so she runs for office and will gets lots of money she can spend on the "campaign"

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk

Liberal Thinking in a Nutshell....... It make no sense to me......

Got this shirt in the mail the other day. I really think it sums up the political climate for the last 50 or so years. And todays science climate with the CDC and others spreading fear with this COVID BS......

(06-16-2022, 11:02 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]“Go gatas” running for Congress again. Is anyone really surprised?

I see they're using the Mikesez's Language Twisting for Dummies approach.

(06-16-2022, 11:02 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]“Go gatas” running for Congress again. Is anyone really surprised?

Wasn't she dying and that's why she needed to be let out during covid?

Where did that story go?

(06-16-2022, 12:37 PM)p_rushing Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-16-2022, 11:02 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]“Go gatas” running for Congress again. Is anyone really surprised?

Wasn't she dying and that's why she needed to be let out during covid?

Where did that story go?

Not dying but concerns over her age and the complications she could encounter with COVID.

(06-16-2022, 11:02 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]“Go gatas” running for Congress again. Is anyone really surprised?

What is sad is that she already has the "uninformed voter" bloc.

(06-16-2022, 02:18 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-16-2022, 11:02 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]“Go gatas” running for Congress again. Is anyone really surprised?

What is sad is that she already has the "uninformed voter" bloc.

Not down here she doesn't. Crowded field already has 8 or 10 candidates for the democrat primary.  Some will drop out before the deadline.  Bracy is the likely winner, though Frost has more money at this point.

(06-16-2022, 11:02 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]“Go gatas” running for Congress again. Is anyone really surprised?

She probably just wants to do some fundraising and use the money for personal expenses.

How the heck? Can a convicted felon actually serve in Congress??

(06-16-2022, 04:47 PM)americus 2.0 Wrote: [ -> ]How the heck? Can a convicted felon actually serve in Congress??

it's just tax fraud and per her, it's racist that she was convicted from it. I guess she just couldn't understand the tax laws and they are just made to disadvantage non-whites.