Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Full Version: Let's Talk About- Political Edition
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663
(09-08-2023, 04:32 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Unfortunately voters are like politicians, they become gears in the machine rather than individual voices of reason. This is why a strong third party needs to emerge. At least for a little while. The two party system has become a duopoly.

100%

(09-08-2023, 03:53 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-08-2023, 03:33 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]"The right" and millions upon millions of sensible voters on the left had a pump the brakes attitude. 

As usual, the loudest voices in the room get amplified and the cries of the "defund" cuckoo-birds got the attention. 
That doesn't mean they represent a majority of Dem/Left voters. 

There are years worth of posts from me in the various "death by police" threads saying better vetting of recruits and reformed training in use of lethal force were the way forward. Sure, plenty of police dept's around the country could be budgeted more wisely, but you never heard me calling to defund or dismantle them. Just fix the problems. And many of them work diligently to do so in a variety of ways. 

Most folks are wise enough to value public safety beyond such a ridiculous concept as defunding police.

No such thing really.
Cute.

If you asked 60 million Biden voters (since you don't think there were 81 mil)  if they wanted to defund or dismantle the police dept in their town, how many do you think would actually want that?
(09-08-2023, 04:32 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Unfortunately voters are like politicians, they become gears in the machine rather than individual voices of reason. This is why a strong third party needs to emerge. At least for a little while. The two party system has become a duopoly.

Tried it in the 90s with Perot and Ventura and Buchanan.  There are reasons it won't happen.  

Every race for every seat is a two candidate race, whether it's an R vs D race in FL or a D vs I race in VT. It's possible that we could get a regional third party like a Bernie party in New England or a Cheney party in the mountain west but that's not desirable.  That woild be just more division.   

First we should work on creating space for 3 way races for Congress.  We could use ranked choice voting, or multi member districts.  Then maybe (but only maybe) those people will vote amend the constitution to make 3 way races for President possible and desirable.

But those are both longshots. We're stuck with 2 parties until ranked choice voting or multi member districts come. So what should we do? We have to join our parties and care about them.  And work for them to be better.  Standing detached and saying "they both suck" ... how does that solve anything?
(09-08-2023, 07:10 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-08-2023, 04:32 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: [ -> ]Unfortunately voters are like politicians, they become gears in the machine rather than individual voices of reason. This is why a strong third party needs to emerge. At least for a little while. The two party system has become a duopoly.

100%

(09-08-2023, 03:53 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]No such thing really.
Cute.

If you asked 60 million Biden voters (since you don't think there were 81 mil)  if they wanted to defund or dismantle the police dept in their town, how many do you think would actually want that?

Some do. Definitely. Others accept the lie that defund just means reform. There is no reason to conflate those words unless you're teaching a master class on the Overton Window.
(09-08-2023, 03:33 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-08-2023, 12:36 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ]Sure but it was all fun and games to pound the podium and rail against the police until she needed them.  If memory severs me correct, I believe it was the right saying pump the brakes.  We need the police but let’s get rid of the few bad apples.

"The right" and millions upon millions of sensible voters on the left had a pump the brakes attitude. 

As usual, the loudest voices in the room get amplified and the cries of the "defund" cuckoo-birds got the attention. 
That doesn't mean they represent a majority of Dem/Left voters. 

There are years worth of posts from me in the various "death by police" threads saying better vetting of recruits and reformed training in use of lethal force were the way forward. Sure, plenty of police dept's around the country could be budgeted more wisely, but you never heard me calling to defund or dismantle them. Just fix the problems. And many of them work diligently to do so in a variety of ways. 

Most folks are wise enough to value public safety beyond such a ridiculous concept as defunding police.

Just because you were a voice of reason does not change the fact that the not Fox News agencies went all in on the defund the police rhetoric.  You know this to be true and you know your party embraced the narrative.  Until you and many like minded sensible democrats start challenging your party this is what you get.  Many republicans have left their party and went Libertarian.  We will not see a change until moderate democrats start openly challenging the far left party leader’s currently in charge of your party.
(09-08-2023, 07:58 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-08-2023, 03:33 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]"The right" and millions upon millions of sensible voters on the left had a pump the brakes attitude. 

As usual, the loudest voices in the room get amplified and the cries of the "defund" cuckoo-birds got the attention. 
That doesn't mean they represent a majority of Dem/Left voters. 

There are years worth of posts from me in the various "death by police" threads saying better vetting of recruits and reformed training in use of lethal force were the way forward. Sure, plenty of police dept's around the country could be budgeted more wisely, but you never heard me calling to defund or dismantle them. Just fix the problems. And many of them work diligently to do so in a variety of ways. 

Most folks are wise enough to value public safety beyond such a ridiculous concept as defunding police.

Just because you were a voice of reason does not change the fact that the not Fox News agencies went all in on the defund the police rhetoric.  You know this to be true and you know your party embraced the narrative.  Until you and many like minded sensible democrats start challenging your party this is what you get.  Many republicans have left their party and went Libertarian.  We will not see a change until moderate democrats start openly challenging the far left party leader’s currently in charge of your party.

The media outlets (traditional and social) push narratives that keep viewers watching, more than they push any particular agenda.  They are looking for engagement to sell ads.  Their agenda is to have the same or better market share and viewership next quarter.
Yes, the MSM pushed defund the police as a narrative.  People engaged with that even though they disagreed.  Biden ran against the idea.  He was on the ballot.  The MSM wasn't.
(09-08-2023, 07:58 PM)copycat Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-08-2023, 03:33 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]"The right" and millions upon millions of sensible voters on the left had a pump the brakes attitude. 

As usual, the loudest voices in the room get amplified and the cries of the "defund" cuckoo-birds got the attention. 
That doesn't mean they represent a majority of Dem/Left voters. 

There are years worth of posts from me in the various "death by police" threads saying better vetting of recruits and reformed training in use of lethal force were the way forward. Sure, plenty of police dept's around the country could be budgeted more wisely, but you never heard me calling to defund or dismantle them. Just fix the problems. And many of them work diligently to do so in a variety of ways. 

Most folks are wise enough to value public safety beyond such a ridiculous concept as defunding police.

Just because you were a voice of reason does not change the fact that the not Fox News agencies went all in on the defund the police rhetoric.  You know this to be true and you know your party embraced the narrative.  Until you and many like minded sensible democrats start challenging your party this is what you get.  Many republicans have left their party and went Libertarian.  We will not see a change until moderate democrats start openly challenging the far left party leader’s currently in charge of your party.

I'm independent so it's not my party - but I appreciate the sentiment of the post. Even if I believe many actual voters of the party were not all in on that rhetoric as much as the media would lead you to believe. 

I think sensibly minded folk from both side of the aisle need to capitulate change. 

If we are to rid ourselves of so much ridiculous extreme [BLEEP]-for-tat it will need to be a wave of such folk calling for an end to the silliness.

(09-08-2023, 07:31 PM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-08-2023, 07:10 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]100%

Cute.

If you asked 60 million Biden voters (since you don't think there were 81 mil)  if they wanted to defund or dismantle the police dept in their town, how many do you think would actually want that?

Some do. Definitely. Others accept the lie that defund just means reform. There is no reason to conflate those words unless you're teaching a master class on the Overton Window.

I didn't conflate [BLEEP] - not one bit -  but great job on not offering any semblance of an answer
It's not always about you, dog. You love to hide behind "words in your mouth" when most of us are talking about concepts or movements. You're not part of that movement. Great job. You still support it. Our economy sucks right now because Biden is the lesser of two evils. People are dying at greater rates in inner cities because leftist DAs aren't prosecuting crime and cops are being hamstrung. Sure glad you never said "defund the police!" You support people that did with your vote. I don't give a [BLEEP] about your words.
The economy would be suffering just as much with Trump in charge.
We have a trilemma right now. Higher interest rates are punishing poor and lower middle class people and tamping down consumer spending. We have to either raise taxes, or reduce spending, or lower interest rates and accept some inflation. Biden has been doing his best to delay the decision. Trump would be doing the same.
(09-09-2023, 08:32 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]The economy would be suffering just as much with Trump in charge.
We have a trilemma right now.  Higher interest rates are punishing poor and lower middle class people and tamping down consumer spending.  We have to either raise taxes, or reduce spending, or lower interest rates and accept some inflation.  Biden has been doing his best to delay the decision.  Trump would be doing the same.

You really are a broken record.  For once, forget about Trump and let's have a meaningful discussion about the current President and what he is or is not doing for the economy.
(09-09-2023, 09:15 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-09-2023, 08:32 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]The economy would be suffering just as much with Trump in charge.
We have a trilemma right now.  Higher interest rates are punishing poor and lower middle class people and tamping down consumer spending.  We have to either raise taxes, or reduce spending, or lower interest rates and accept some inflation.  Biden has been doing his best to delay the decision.  Trump would be doing the same.

You really are a broken record.  For once, forget about Trump and let's have a meaningful discussion about the current President and what he is or is not doing for the economy.

The post isn't actually about Trump. I am just disagreeing with L2L when he says, "Our economy sucks right now because Biden is the lesser of two evils." Thats wrong.  The economy sucks because of the trilemma.
(09-09-2023, 08:10 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]It's not always about you, dog. You love to hide behind "words in your mouth" when most of us are talking about concepts or movements. You're not part of that movement. Great job. You still support it. Our economy sucks right now because Biden is the lesser of two evils. People are dying at greater rates in inner cities because leftist DAs aren't prosecuting crime and cops are being hamstrung. Sure glad you never said "defund the police!" You support people that did with your vote. I don't give a [BLEEP] about your words.

Way to miss the point, dog.

Not about me. I'm attempting to point out there there many millions of Dem voters out there that feel the same way I do about it and you're either willfully ignoring that or being stupid. 

Furthering that - those millions vote locally according to the sensibility I've laid out - and most of them now live in cities and towns where the police were never defunded. 

A few posters here love to point out 3 US cities that actually have a problem with this horse [BLEEP] and attempt to pretend it is a pandemic in out nation when it's not. 

Sucks for the ppl in those few places and I hope they got the lesson they needed to learn about voting locally based on some flavor-of-the-day policy tripe. But this crap isn't rampant and it isn't indicative of a typical Democrat voter. 
Just something fun to hate/rant on for the right bent infotainment set.
(09-09-2023, 09:26 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-09-2023, 09:15 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]You really are a broken record.  For once, forget about Trump and let's have a meaningful discussion about the current President and what he is or is not doing for the economy.

The post isn't actually about Trump. I am just disagreeing with L2L when he says, "Our economy sucks right now because Biden is the lesser of two evils." Thats wrong.  The economy sucks because of the trilemma.

You're wrong, as usual. Our economy is where it is because Biden cares more about the profits of the elite than us. It's that simple. For all of Trump's flaws, he was fighting the elite. Sure, not always. Not even for our benefit. He's just a narcissist that wants to be loved. There was still corruption. It wasn't this, though. Biden is for sale and you're a big dummy to ignore it.

(09-09-2023, 10:00 AM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-09-2023, 08:10 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]It's not always about you, dog. You love to hide behind "words in your mouth" when most of us are talking about concepts or movements. You're not part of that movement. Great job. You still support it. Our economy sucks right now because Biden is the lesser of two evils. People are dying at greater rates in inner cities because leftist DAs aren't prosecuting crime and cops are being hamstrung. Sure glad you never said "defund the police!" You support people that did with your vote. I don't give a [BLEEP] about your words.

Way to miss the point, dog.

Not about me. I'm attempting to point out there there many millions of Dem voters out there that feel the same way I do about it and you're either willfully ignoring that or being stupid. 

Furthering that - those millions vote locally according to the sensibility I've laid out - and most of them now live in cities and towns where the police were never defunded. 

A few posters here love to point out 3 US cities that actually have a problem with this horse [BLEEP] and attempt to pretend it is a pandemic in out nation when it's not. 

Sucks for the ppl in those few places and I hope they got the lesson they needed to learn about voting locally based on some flavor-of-the-day policy tripe. But this crap isn't rampant and it isn't indicative of a typical Democrat voter. 
Just something fun to hate/rant on for the right bent infotainment set.

Sigh. Same old [BLEEP]. How many ways do you think you're wrong in that post? I'll start getting into the numbers if I get bored later. Not that it will matter.
(09-09-2023, 10:37 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-09-2023, 09:26 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]The post isn't actually about Trump. I am just disagreeing with L2L when he says, "Our economy sucks right now because Biden is the lesser of two evils." Thats wrong.  The economy sucks because of the trilemma.

You're wrong, as usual. Our economy is where it is because Biden cares more about the profits of the elite than us. It's that simple. For all of Trump's flaws, he was fighting the elite. Sure, not always. Not even for our benefit. He's just a narcissist that wants to be loved. There was still corruption. It wasn't this, though. Biden is for sale and you're a big dummy to ignore it.

Those are some big claims.  What evidence do you have? What policy decision by Trump showed that he cared about the people more than the profits of the elites? When did Biden reverse that policy?
New Mexico governor shocks with comment about Constitution after issuing temporary gun ban: Not 'absolute' | Fox News

...After a reporter questioned whether Grisham was upholding her oath to the Constitution, she argued no Constitutional rights were fixed, including her oath.
"No constitutional right, in my view, including my oath, is intended to be absolute," she retorted. Grisham cited restrictions on free speech as an example of how rights can be curtailed in emergency situations...

Makes you wonder what her next ban would be if not challenged.
What evidence do you have that she will ban anything next? That's a question on behalf of all stupid people.
Don't mind me. Just sharing more misinformation. [Image: b6219c608254d854f63f15c888922f11.jpg]

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1...lmR1A&s=19

"CoNdOnInG vIoLeNcE iS oNlY a TrUmP tHinG"

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk
[Image: e04600b0f4b3abd6f5b433d7e8952996.jpg]
(09-10-2023, 10:13 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/status...AIuAQ&s=19

On a MSM outlet tomorrow will be a carefully cropped photograph implying people holding their phones up for a picture are actually giving a nazi salute.
This is a prime example of a politician attempting to use the force of government for purely political purposes. No surprise it came from Fauxcohontas. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/el...cc7fd&ei=9

...Warren, a member of the Armed Services Committee, said she also wants the Defense Department to look into its contractual relationship with the company...

I'm fairly certain I posted here before that the left is targeting Musk to prevent him from getting government contracts. Fauxcohontas revealed the obvious.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663